In all honesty, that wasn't as bad as I thought it was going to be. The guy actually made some good points. For starters, the obvious, exercise is the main key to being healthy along with eating properly...HGH is not the magical fix all solution. OK, that part is obvious.
Next, the side effects he talked about in older individuals, he didn't mention how much HGH was given to these subjects...depending on the amount, and I would imagine that they varied the amounts in several groups since that's how most medical studies are done...that in certain amounts some subjects would experience the sever joint pain he talked about. Think about it, if you've ever used HGH before, then you know it can cause your hands/wrist, ankles, etc to swell and ache a little. If you're older, if you already have arthritis, then perhaps this could make that pain even worse...yes, no? Not sure, but it's possible.
Further, as we age, hormones in the body dwindle, no scientific breakthrough there...he didn't mention the age of the individuals, how long they took the HGH, etc. Is it possible that the introduction of HGH in later years at such a drastic abrupt change that it could cause problems? Not sure, but seems possible. The diabetes claim...I'm not sure about that on, that one did seem a bit far fetched.
Is the guy anti-HGH? In seniors no doubt...in everyone else? Probably...I'd say it's safe to say he is. Did he bash it as hard as he could have? No, he presented a decent arguement, but it had a lot of holes...he did leave a lot of info out from his study.
