911 Conspiracy question.

[OzmO]

I didn't see who I was replying to or I wouldn't have.  anyway, you did reply affirming that something stinks like shit with the moon landing via quote of another.  After everything that's been covered and posted here on the moon landing, I don't know how you can use it as an example.  Not one single person here was able to excuse the evidence I presented on the moon landing.  A thread that you were aware of too.  Almost everything else around the moon landing hoax ct has been absolutely debunked.  

I was using that as an example because its in my mind, its a pretty far fetch CT yet there seems to be many people who still believe it even in the face of overwhelming evidence, for example from this board, SamJag.  So to me, it was a perfect example to highlight the point i was making with the post.  Perhaps it wasn't.   

Your research was excellent on it and in no way was i trying to question it.

None of that can be said about 9/11 as positively as it can be said for the moon landing.

I agree with that.  Part of my point was that 9/11 CT's/questions can be broken down into 3 categories (actually 4 as i think about it more):

-  Inside job (buildings wired for explosives, missile into the pentagon etc.)

This is highly unlikely and far fetched, IMO

These are plausible but i don't think we will ever really know:

-  Fore hand knowledge

-  Ultimate funding and collusion by the Military industrial complex and who ever (saudis, Taliban etc.) to start a war

This is what i think is likely and more plausible

-  9/11 showed just how incompetent our intelligence and defensive responses were that day and many high ranking people are to blame and the embarrassment, backlash and consequences would be severe.

I think  that's what a second investigation would uncover and i think that's why its been blocked.

And I am in favor of a second investigation for other reasons too.  

[chaos]

I'm going to have Mythbusters look intp 9/11 like they did the moon landing.

[Hugo Chavez]

I'm going to have Mythbusters look intp 9/11 like they did the moon landing.

mythbusters didn't even come close to doing the best debunking of the moonlanding ct.  On other issues, they've actually had to reverse some of their previous claims after debunking them.  I wouldn't have much faith in mythbusters tackling such a large CT in a portion of a 1 hour show.

[Hugo Chavez]

I was using that as an example because its in my mind, its a pretty far fetch CT yet there seems to be many people who still believe it even in the face of overwhelming evidence, for example from this board, SamJag.  So to me, it was a perfect example to highlight the point i was making with the post.  Perhaps it wasn't.   

Your research was excellent on it and in no way was i trying to question it.

I agree with that.  Part of my point was that 9/11 CT's/questions can be broken down into 3 categories (actually 4 as i think about it more):

-  Inside job (buildings wired for explosives, missile into the pentagon etc.)

This is highly unlikely and far fetched, IMO

These are plausible but i don't think we will ever really know:

-  Fore hand knowledge

-  Ultimate funding and collusion by the Military industrial complex and who ever (saudis, Taliban etc.) to start a war

This is what i think is likely and more plausible

-  9/11 showed just how incompetent our intelligence and defensive responses were that day and many high ranking people are to blame and the embarrassment, backlash and consequences would be severe.

I think  that's what a second investigation would uncover and i think that's why its been blocked.

And I am in favor of a second investigation for other reasons too.  

so basically you USED the moonlanding CT to make a point.  Not cool imo but ok.  You don't really think there are things that stink like shit around the moon landing.  got it.  You just wanted to use it to make a point. I think that's terrible but I got it.

[OzmO]

so basically you USED the moonlanding CT to make a point.  Not cool imo but ok.  You don't really think there are things that stink like shit around the moon landing.  got it.  You just wanted to use it to make a point. I think that's terrible but I got it.

Just curious, why is that not cool or why is it terrible?  The moon landing CT is alive and well.  Maybe the Queen being a reptile would have been better. 

Thanks anyways. 

[Hugo Chavez]

Just curious, why is that not cool or why is it terrible?  The moon landing CT is alive and well.  Maybe the Queen being a reptile would have been better.  

Thanks anyways.  

Not cool because it was coming from you.  That's it's alive and well with others isn't the point.  You used the moon landing ct to fit your needs even though you don't in the slightest believe anything smells like shit there.  If you were thinking of others only, you might as well have used the queen being a reptile for example.  But you affirmed in agreement via your reply that the moon landing also "smells like shit"

and you know right where you can put your thanks anyways.

[OzmO]

Not cool because it was coming from you.  That's it's alive and well with others isn't the point.  You used the moon landing ct to fit your needs even though you don't in the slightest believe anything smells like shit there.  If you were thinking of others only, you might as well have used the queen being a reptile for example.  But you affirmed in agreement via your reply that the moon landing also "smells like shit"

and you know right where you can put your thanks anyways.

That makes no sense.  And shows you take things way too seriously.   But what ever coming from you.  As if you didn't know you were replying to my post in the first place.   

Thanks anyways  

[Hugo Chavez]

  whatever

[OzmO]

whatever

Yeah, I'm not sure if I'm quoting your post here, but yeah sure, "whatever"  

Have a good night Hugo. 

[Hugo Chavez]

go fuck yourself.

[OzmO]

go fuck yourself.

Go to bed Hugo.