Author Topic: CNBC does not accept coordinated effort from candidate supporters  (Read 265 times)

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
If this was anyone else do you think they would pull this shit? I have never in my life heard of anyone calling a poll non legit because the people voting are more co ordinated and passionate about the subject at hand then the others are. Totally ridiculous. Why arent the other candidates supporters just as organized and excited about their candidate? That should be the issue that's discussed.



 Dear folks,
 
You guys are good. Real good. You are truly a force on World Wide Web and I tip my hat to you.
 
That's based on my first hand experience of your work regarding our CNBC Republican candidate debate. After the debate, we put up a poll on our Web site asking who readers thought won the debate. You guys flooded it.
 
Now these Internet polls are admittedly unscientific and subject to hacking. In the end, they are really just a way to engage the reader and take a quick temperature reading of your audience. Nothing more and nothing less. The cyber equivalent of asking the room for a show of hands on a certain question.
 
So there was our after-debate poll. The numbers grew ... 7,000-plus votes after a couple of hours ... and Ron Paul was at 75%.
 
Now Paul is a fine gentleman with some substantial backing and, by the way, was a dynamic presence throughout the debate , but I haven't seen him pull those kind of numbers in any "legit" poll. Our poll was either hacked or the target of a campaign. So we took the poll down.
 
The next day, our email basket was flooded with Ron Paul support messages. And the computer logs showed the poll had been hit with traffic from Ron Paul chat sites. I learned other Internet polls that night had been hit in similar fashion. Congratulations. You folks are obviously well-organized and feel strongly about your candidate and I can't help but admire that.
 
But you also ruined the purpose of the poll. It was no longer an honest "show of hands" -- it suddenly was a platform for beating the Ron Paul drum. That certainly wasn't our intention and certainly doesn't serve our readers ... at least those who aren't already in the Ron Paul camp.
 
Some of you Ron Paul fans take issue with my decision to take the poll down. Fine. When a well-organized and committed "few" can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of "the many," I get a little worried. I'd take it down again.
 
Sincerely,
 
Allen Wastler
 Managing Editor, CNBC.com



240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: CNBC does not accept coordinated effort from candidate supporters
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2011, 08:45:39 AM »
what these eggheads do not realize is that ron paul's teams of internet warriors will ALSO help greatly in defeating an obama.

You'd think repubs would WANT a guy who owns the internet and the entire generation of young voters.  Instead, they want to shit on him because he didn't work for the fed/koch like Cain or he's not a globalist like Perry. 

You wankers deserve another 4 years of obama if you ignore ron paul.

Freeborn126

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 694
Re: CNBC does not accept coordinated effort from candidate supporters
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2011, 09:20:20 AM »
They can't stop the wave of truth now.  This is the beginning of the end for these MSM types. 
Live free or die