Author Topic: By 2002, Kamali was declining  (Read 8596 times)

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17037
  • "From the pucha to the culo..."
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #25 on: July 04, 2017, 02:10:19 PM »
 
And still "growing like a weed"?

 :D  how did you guess?!   ;D
T

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17037
  • "From the pucha to the culo..."
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #26 on: July 04, 2017, 02:12:19 PM »
What's with the forearms? Is it that his upper arms have atrophied due to nerve damage and look smaller in comparison, or what?

His arms in that pic are stuck in the telltale site injected bicep-angle. They get stuck like that for about a week following a few "heavy" injections. Its weird. I know from first hand experience lol.. Luckly its not permament.
T

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #27 on: July 04, 2017, 06:49:30 PM »
I think it's genetic.

He has always had thick upper Brachioradialis development in his forearm and literally zero Brachialis development on the side of his upper arm.

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #28 on: July 04, 2017, 06:52:39 PM »
.

ESFitness

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10314
  • Illuminati has fetal alcohol syndrome
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #29 on: July 04, 2017, 06:57:50 PM »
I think it's genetic.

He has always had thick upper Brachioradialis development in his forearm and literally zero Brachialis development on the side of his upper arm.

Could be.. Injust remember my arms being stuck out like that after a few days of 2cc water based in each bicep and walking around like i was. Wearing an Under bench shirt lol.

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #30 on: July 04, 2017, 07:00:42 PM »
2005 and he managed to hold it together 'til around here...


Titus was better though.

Nether Animal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13813
  • Team Mower Forever
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #31 on: July 04, 2017, 07:01:44 PM »
Most fucked up arms in Milos' gym


Running Wild

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • Running Blood
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #32 on: July 04, 2017, 07:21:22 PM »
Both biceps and triceps look torn... wtf  :-X

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17037
  • "From the pucha to the culo..."
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #33 on: July 04, 2017, 09:57:35 PM »
I think it's genetic.

He has always had thick upper Brachioradialis development in his forearm and literally zero Brachialis development on the side of his upper arm.

I love this pic of him (nh).  I was looking to post it if I could find a decent version, thanks  :)

It reminds us that - even pretty much off-season (as I believe he is here) - he didn't always have the chipmunk face, double chin and Derek Anthony style facial fluid.  I wonder if it just crept up on him?
T

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #34 on: July 05, 2017, 12:14:36 AM »
I love this pic of him (nh).  I was looking to post it if I could find a decent version, thanks  :)

It reminds us that - even pretty much off-season (as I believe he is here) - he didn't always have the chipmunk face, double chin and Derek Anthony style facial fluid.  I wonder if it just crept up on him?
he has sunken thyroid cheeks that is about a week after a show I bet

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17037
  • "From the pucha to the culo..."
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #35 on: July 07, 2017, 04:58:14 PM »

From a few hours ago - I didn't mess with the aspect ratio, just (again) brightened the picture up (King - learn how to adjust your camera settings, dude!)

I left the comment box in as he's clearly happy with progress - dropped 3lbs since last week so really getting that ripped and grainy look now...
T

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17037
  • "From the pucha to the culo..."
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #36 on: July 07, 2017, 05:01:37 PM »

Just after I posted that I realised what it reminded me of....  ;D
T

Running Wild

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • Running Blood
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #37 on: July 07, 2017, 05:14:05 PM »
From a few hours ago - I didn't mess with the aspect ratio, just (again) brightened the picture up (King - learn how to adjust your camera settings, dude!)

I left the comment box in as he's clearly happy with progress - dropped 3lbs since last week so really getting that ripped and grainy look now...

Looks to be downsizing.... oil abuse will become more obvious now.

FREAKgeek

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5722
  • Fan of the Golden Era
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #38 on: July 07, 2017, 05:18:14 PM »
Adding nothing to the debate except pathetically stupid pics (what's new)





either staring at a big mac or 1st grade flashcards

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17037
  • "From the pucha to the culo..."
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #39 on: July 07, 2017, 06:02:31 PM »
either staring at a big mac or 1st grade flashcards

 ;D
T

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: By 2002, Kamali was declining
« Reply #40 on: July 08, 2017, 08:54:38 AM »
What's with the forearms? Is it that his upper arms have atrophied due to nerve damage and look smaller in comparison, or what?

oil