nowadays, even when Jay is ripped to shreds and depleted, he still has love handles. despite what people say about ronnie's distention, Jay's waist is much wider
Jay's waist always has been wider than Ronnie's and always will be. But his taper wasn't too bad in that clip at all. He just has limb proportions which make him look blocky. If his arms were longer and his lats originated closer to his waist I don't think he would look blocky. Also, if he was a little taller he would have more of a lanky look and not a stocky look.
Your standards are not consistent. By all means, you can see he has packed far more mass on his frame than is comfortable on him. Ronnie may be bigger but he holds his mass better, e.g., his frame is one more designed to spit muscle mass off it.Just the other day you made comments that Rich Gaspari wasn't as good as Haney in 1987, yet Gaspari had similar flaws to Cutler.Something you aren't willing to admit is that you consider guts to be a travesty of bodybuilding beyond all forgiveness. So rather than just coming out and saying this you feel the need to come up with weak arguments that Ronnie " lacks balance . " or " has poor calves . ", and so on.Why not just say Ronnie's gut makes him look worse than Jay in your mind? That still wouldn't explain your stance on Yates though.
lol!Jay is much like Eduardo Kawak. "Blocky" might not be the correct term since he has a dramatic taper. But he is probably TOO thick (yes that is possible) and Jay is also shorter which doesn't create as pleasing look as when someone is 5'11-6'0. Think Bob Paris.
Jay looks good in the video why the he decide to get a baby?
No offence to Jay, but everybody looks good posing on their own.
