vince criticises hst because the creator is not currently making gains, even though he has obviously achieved success and so have others. he has, in fact, experimented.
vince has not even attempted to perform his program. no one has. he hasn't even committed it to text 15 pages later.
now he is starting to whinge about his detractors, implying their negativity and if THEY CRITICISE he (who has not even so much as committed a theory to text, never mind actually testing it) they are simply not constructive.
is that not the very height of arrogance.
he has played on people's desire for results to achieve his own agenda, that being attention. now he wants to grab his bat and go home in a huff.
my issue is not his ideology, but his hypocrisy and arrogance. remember WHY he commenced this thread (to critique hst and hit, etc), but then comes up with some cock and bull theory THAT HASN'T EVEN BEEN APPLIED YET.
vince says doms is the most important aspect when science and field tests on athletes proves that it isn't.
vince says that one must eat more during the program but then says that nutrition isn't important.
vince says that overtraining doesn't exist, but then says that one must not train more than once every 3 days, especially if their natural
vince says that one must progress every single workout no matter what sex, age, health, size, level of fitness, hormonal levels, recovery ability, genetics, strength/muscle mass level, drugs/natural, etc, etc, etc.
vince looks like shit. sorry pumpster but this is a factor when he has only himself to offer as a subject that has PARTIALLY performed the program. the difference between your example and vince's is that the football coach can actually offer countless successful athletes that have practised his ideology. vince can only partially offer himself (he hasn't even fully applied it and god knows what ACTUAL results he got).
there are too many contradictions with vince's logic, aside from the fact that he seems to make it up as he goes along.
if vince had come on here and said, "guys, i want to discuss this theory i have. what do you think?" i would have been more receptive, but he has not done this. he has come on here and said everyone else is wrong and he is right (and perhaps vince gironda and larry scott are worthy also
).
vince basile = attention whore.