I think it's unfair to assume that those people may not also giving to charity leaps and bounds above what they spend on themselves.
That's possible, but where does someone draw the line?
Again, I have to refer back to the Readers Digest article on that line worker from Ford. Probably the most touching story I've read about someone.
Remember Rickey Henderson? He was always referring to god when talking about one thing or another and the guy actually held out and would not play baseball because he thought 3 MILLION dollars per year was not fair to him.
Is he being reasonable because he should get fair market value (I'm not against someone earning a fair wage)?
But his fair market value was that at that time, he felt he should be the highest paid player in the game and when someone signed a bigger contract, he failed to honor his contract and demanded more money. How would his creator look at this. Just a misguided person, but he's saved and is welcome in the kingdom of heaven, or a self absorbed, gluttonous pig who would make Satan smile?
I'm just trying to establish some lines in the sand.
What makes your charity different than Bill Gates? SHOULD he, in the eyes of God live a different lifestyle than you, because he earns more? SHOULD he place himself in a different category. IS IT UNREASONABLE to expect him to live in a normal suburb around normal people and not be isolated in a 50 million dollar compound?
A conversation I had with 2 very religious (christian) women I had 2 days ago. We were talking about New Years and working the holidays etc..... They both agreed, worship and count the money, worship and count the money. I know that one of them admits to being addicted to online shopping (and I'm not talking about buying for others). I believe she said she has over 100 pairs of shoes.
Again, these are not just normal everyday people, they tell me how deep their faith is and how close their relationship with God. They always tell me that I need saved and they pray for me...so I find their behavior conflicting.