Author Topic: Dorian Yates' first Olympia win (Read 10505 times)

Earl1972 · « **Reply #100 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:34:18 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:32:10 PM

LMFAO that goes to show you how far and ahead Yates was against Kevin he could beat him ( and everyone else ) despite having a torn bicep

and his ' arm ' wasn't missing ONE bicep was shorter and not by much either top is 1993 bottom 1994 NOT much of a difference , there goes your theory of " one arm "

again that is why bodybuilding is fucked up

not bu much haha that "arm" is an eyesore

yates ruined bodybuilding

E

Earl1972 · « **Reply #101 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:35:29 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:33:42 PM

There were plenty of physiques to ' admire ' just because he didn't win the Olympia doesn't mean you can't ' admire ' his physique

yeah that doesn't matter if the physiques that people admired won, all that would've happened is more fans and more money

E

figgs · « **Reply #102 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:38:32 PM »

Nasser and Yates were CLOSE competition!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #103 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:39:38 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on January 21, 2007, 05:35:29 PM

yeah that doesn't matter if the physiques that people admired won, all that would've happened is more fans and more money

E

Oh so your concerned about the sport

give me a break , none of that happened when more aesthetic phsyiques were winning so its all the sudden supposed to change?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #104 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM »

Quote from: figgs on January 21, 2007, 05:38:32 PM

Nasser and Yates were CLOSE competition!

Good choice posting only front pics

they were close alright lol

Necrosis · « **Reply #105 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:44:53 PM »

ND you must be joking with that last pic, hahah. nasser owns dorian from the front. and in that back shot his arms and delts are superior. not to mention the bigger and more ripped hams and glutes and it even appears based on the photo that his calfs are better. his back isnt even that much off.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #106 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:45:50 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on January 21, 2007, 05:44:53 PM

ND you must be joking with that last pic, hahah. nasser owns dorian from the front. and in that back shot his arms and delts are superior. not to mention the bigger and more ripped hams and glutes and it even appears based on the photo that his calfs are better. his back isnt even that much off.

Oh please NO one owned Dorian from the back , especially NOT Nasser

figgs · « **Reply #107 on:** January 21, 2007, 06:48:40 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:45:50 PM

Oh please NO one owned Dorian from the back , especially NOT Nasser

Nasser certainly comes pretty close. He's not as dry and tight, but he's measuring up in width and thickness for sure!!

Earl1972 · « **Reply #108 on:** January 21, 2007, 09:48:17 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:39:38 PM

Oh so your concerned about the sport give me a break , none of that happened when more aesthetic phsyiques were winning so its all the sudden supposed to change?

bodybuilding popularity has declined over the years are you denying that?

E

delta9mda · « **Reply #109 on:** January 21, 2007, 10:36:21 PM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on January 21, 2007, 05:27:22 PM

haha somebody got their feelings hurt

you have no proof that kev used escilene and you have no proof that dorian didn't either

dorian's physique matched his british looking face, UGLY

E

you are taking the piss

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #110 on:** January 22, 2007, 01:03:41 AM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on January 21, 2007, 09:48:17 PM

bodybuilding popularity has declined over the years are you denying that?

E

Bodybuilding popularity has become stagnant over the years , I don't think theres been a growth or a decline , Lee Haney in his Olympia showings used to pose to around 6K people Ronnie 7K not much of a difference

Bear · « **Reply #111 on:** January 22, 2007, 02:41:59 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM

Good choice posting only front pics they were close alright lol

Lol, the front is half of the body, do you know about this? Have you heard about this? This is where your arguments achieve self-ownage. Of course it wasn't close from the back, but Nasser dominated from the front, ergo it wasn't as far off as all that, although I agree that with that back Nasser was never gonna actually win the thing. But to an unbiased observer unaware of the history and politics of these two competitors in these photos, Dorian is about the 5th best onstage from the front. You know it.

kyomu · « **Reply #112 on:** January 22, 2007, 02:55:58 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:41:04 PM

Good choice posting only front pics they were close alright lol

No they were NOT close. Dorian was owned completely from the front.
I still believe Nasser and Dorian was a tie.

Necrosis · « **Reply #113 on:** January 22, 2007, 11:16:18 AM »

dorians, side chest, front double bi, and most muscular lose to nasser. ab and thigh goes to nasser in my opinon with better quad detail and seperation. front lat to dorian and the back poses. but from the bottom half in back poses, and delts and arms dorian loses to alot of guys. his back alone is good but ND keeps harping on proportion and balance and from the pic it is clear that nasser should have won.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #114 on:** January 22, 2007, 11:54:16 AM »

Quote from: Earl1972 on January 20, 2007, 06:08:06 PM

why is it when dorian wins you agree with the judges but when ronnie or anybody else wins you don't agree

E

Great question, but don't expect an honest answer.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #115 on:** January 22, 2007, 11:57:24 AM »

Quote from: IceCold on January 20, 2007, 06:31:49 PM

looks like earl is a racist - like ronnie.

You and pubes are quick to call people racist when they don't agree with you. Maybe you're the one that is racist. Ever think of that?

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #116 on:** January 22, 2007, 12:04:04 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 21, 2007, 05:32:10 PM

LMFAO that goes to show you how far and ahead Yates was against Kevin he could beat him ( and everyone else ) despite having a torn bicep

and his ' arm ' wasn't missing ONE bicep was shorter and not by much either top is 1993 bottom 1994 NOT much of a difference , there goes your theory of " one arm "

94, 95, 96, 97
One Word: MISSING

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #117 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:51:37 PM »

Quote from: Bear on January 22, 2007, 02:41:59 AM

Lol, the front is half of the body, do you know about this? Have you heard about this? This is where your arguments achieve self-ownage. Of course it wasn't close from the back, but Nasser dominated from the front, ergo it wasn't as far off as all that, although I agree that with that back Nasser was never gonna actually win the thing. But to an unbiased observer unaware of the history and politics of these two competitors in these photos, Dorian is about the 5th best onstage from the front. You know it.

He never dominated from the front , side , or back , he never came close to Dorian on the score cards , front double biceps you could give to Nasser post tear , ab-thigh Yates , front latspread close but Yates has the edge , side chest & triceps Dorian , every back shot Dorian , so lets give Nasser 2 poses he's still down all the others this isn't close like reality it wasn't close.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #118 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:54:11 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on January 22, 2007, 12:04:04 PM

94, 95, 96, 97
One Word: MISSING

Yawn . 1994/1993 ONE bicep is shorter than the other not missing , his biceps were never outstanding to begin with , its not like he tore his best part A'la Coleman lat

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #119 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:59:19 PM »

93 top , 94 bottom , one bicep is shorter than the other and not by much

donrhummy · « **Reply #120 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:00:42 PM »

I really don't get this whole Dorian vs Ronnie thing. They're both Mr. O's sure, but neither one should ever rank among the best Mr. O's. Sergio, Arnold ('74), Haney ('85-88, '91) - THOSE guys were amazing.

Look at Arnold's size with such a small stomach/tight waist (and calves). And in '74 he actually had legs!

pobrecito · « **Reply #121 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:03:13 PM »

Quote from: donrhummy on January 22, 2007, 04:00:42 PM

I really don't get this whole Dorian vs Ronnie thing. They're both Mr. O's sure, but neither one should ever rank among the best Mr. O's. Sergio, Arnold ('74), Haney ('85-88, '91) - THOSE guys were amazing.

Quit living in the past. Haney was a soft 250lbs in 91. Dorian defeated him in muscularity despite being 12lbs lighter. Not to mention, in Dorian's book, he says its a good thing Haney retired in 91, becuase he would have defeated him in 92

Haney was overrated.

donrhummy · « **Reply #122 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:05:06 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 22, 2007, 04:03:13 PM

Quit living in the past. Haney was a soft 250lbs in 91. Dorian defeated him in muscularity despite being 12lbs lighter. Not to mention, in Dorian's book, he says its a good thing Haney retired in 91, becuase he would have defeated him in 92 Haney was overrated.

Yeah, Dorian also said that Haney was born with a great back and had it easy whereas he (Dorian) had to work for his back. Please. i've seen the pics of him as a kid and maybe one in a million has a back like that after 1 year of weightlifting. his claims mean nothing.

pobrecito · « **Reply #123 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:07:40 PM »

Quote from: donrhummy on January 22, 2007, 04:05:06 PM

Yeah, Dorian also said that Haney was born with a great back and had it easy whereas he (Dorian) had to work for his back. Please. i've seen the pics of him as a kid and maybe one in a million has a back like that after 1 year of weightlifting. his claims mean nothing.

Haney's back was no where near Yates, not in width, detail, condition, separation, nothing.