Author Topic: Arnold vs.Ronnie (Read 27038 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #50 on:** January 20, 2007, 06:22:26 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2007, 06:21:03 PM

Thats Ronnie 2004 and try and convince yourself Ronnie's calves are the same size as Arnolds because you're not convincing me

no one ever said you were smart.

you have demonstrated this time and time again...

by the way, hows the climb going?:

LOL

Hulkster · « **Reply #51 on:** January 20, 2007, 06:23:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2007, 06:21:03 PM

Thats Ronnie 2004 and try and convince yourself Ronnie's calves are the same size as Arnolds because you're not convincing me

LOL so, was Ronnie 2004 a different height than Ronnie 99?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #52 on:** January 20, 2007, 06:23:31 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 20, 2007, 06:22:26 PM

no one ever said you were smart.

you have demonstrated this time and time again...

by the way, hows the climb going?:

LOL

LMFAO

Dorian is the most overrated bodybuilder of all time

Don't ever question anyones intelligence

Sir Bigness · « **Reply #53 on:** January 20, 2007, 07:32:43 PM »

Lifetime achievement=Arnold. Bodybuilding achievement (thusfar) = Ronnie

GroinkTropin · « **Reply #54 on:** January 20, 2007, 08:58:35 PM »

Someone shop that pic of arnie and give us an idea of what he'd look like on todays shit, ship it.

realkarateblackbelt · « **Reply #55 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:12:46 PM »

ah, most of Ronnie's greater weight was obviously in his thighs and back. Those parts weren't considered as important as they are now, so Arnold never developed them to their full potential, and he didn't use nearly as much drugs I suspect.

They both have ideal structures for bodybuilding - average/tall height, medium build/skeleton, and full muscle bellies.

ali23 · « **Reply #56 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:17:11 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 20, 2007, 05:14:46 PM

LMFAO I was waiting for the countdown to the excuses and thanks for meeting the deadline , Arnold is the King of Bodybuilding

NOT photoshopped

the picture is photoshopped friend... it is.. arnolds quads were not that big.. same goes for the arms..

pobrecito · « **Reply #57 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:26:03 PM »

Ronnie looks like shit in the front double bi...period.

evolutnbatista · « **Reply #58 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:31:24 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 20, 2007, 06:15:23 PM

yeah except ronnies aren't implants!

evolutnbatista · « **Reply #59 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:34:11 PM »

Quote from: Methyl Mike on January 20, 2007, 08:58:35 PM

Someone shop that pic of arnie and give us an idea of what he'd look like on todays shit, ship it.

why don't you photoshop a pic of ronnie on the shit arnold was on.... the shit back then was PURE!!!! now a days its not as potent

realkarateblackbelt · « **Reply #60 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:34:42 PM »

ribonucleic · « **Reply #61 on:** January 20, 2007, 09:35:42 PM »

Give Arnold Ronnie's drugs and Photoshop him and he's still getting owned on quads. Just deal with it.

Hulkster · « **Reply #62 on:** January 20, 2007, 10:13:47 PM »

true.

Ronnie's quads destroy Arnolds in every way, shape and form.

realkarateblackbelt · « **Reply #63 on:** January 20, 2007, 10:44:20 PM »

YEah duh.

Arnold didn't focus on quads. Nobody really did until Platz came around.

ribonucleic · « **Reply #64 on:** January 20, 2007, 10:47:42 PM »

Quote from: realkarateblackbelt on January 20, 2007, 10:44:20 PM

Arnold didn't focus on quads. Nobody really did until Platz came around.

By this reasoning, you could say the reason Kamali sucks is because he "hasn't focused" on not sucking.

realkarateblackbelt · « **Reply #65 on:** January 20, 2007, 11:22:59 PM »

That's a poor comparison. Arnold has to be taken in the context of his contemporaries. Practicly nobody had huge quads or legs in his prime. Or a back for that matter. Arnold said in pumping iron he would always work out so that everything was balanced. There was still somewhat of a statuesque look they were trying to achieve even in the 70s. Big legs were considered ugly and clumsy looking.

Today it's just about big! big! big! Proportion isn't as important.

the shadow · « **Reply #66 on:** January 21, 2007, 12:07:31 AM »

arnold forever..discussing this is just pure retard.like tom platz said this on 1980 comeback video..

'we don't consider arnold as a bodybuilder,we consider him bodybuilding.arnold is bodybuilding'

MRMD2003 · « **Reply #67 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:45:46 AM »

ronnie in his 98 condition !!!! his 98 physique is probably the best ever with the exception of wheeler 98 arnold. even jay cutler stated that flex's physique was one of the best ever.

ether · « **Reply #68 on:** January 21, 2007, 06:10:38 AM »

Ronnie can't touch the king!

ether · « **Reply #69 on:** January 21, 2007, 06:19:16 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 20, 2007, 10:13:47 PM

true.

Ronnie's quads destroy Arnolds in every way, shape and form.

No GH, No Slin.... Just superior Genetics and Work Ethic, making that overfed ape look inferior in every way.

ether · « **Reply #70 on:** January 21, 2007, 06:20:48 AM »

Post a Ronnie side chest that can even come close to this.

GoneAway · « **Reply #71 on:** January 21, 2007, 08:06:18 AM »

Quote from: ether on January 21, 2007, 06:19:16 AM

No GH, No Slin.... Just superior Genetics and Work Ethic, making that overfed ape look inferior in every way.

Sick quads!

I think Ronnie's been more muscular and ripped/conditioned than Arnold, but it's amazing how close they come, when they're 25 years apart.

Hulkster · « **Reply #72 on:** January 21, 2007, 08:07:14 AM »

Arnold's calves are much better than Ronnie's.

kyomu · « **Reply #73 on:** January 21, 2007, 08:14:13 AM »

Quote from: ether on January 21, 2007, 06:20:48 AM

Post a Ronnie side chest that can even come close to this.

I want to know how arnold would have shrinked when he went down same level of bodyfat as ronnies bodyfat.

Royalty · « **Reply #74 on:** January 21, 2007, 08:15:18 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 20, 2007, 06:19:10 PM

think about it:

4 inches smaller in height but still more massive by almost 20 pounds.

thats an insane mass difference we are talking about here:

Compare Arnold at 28 with Ronnie at 28. That would be a much closer representation of realilty.