not to start a flame war, but why are you so flippant about the casual way Rudy looked at evidence from 9/11?
You have a MS in teaching CJ, right? Aside from your spelling and grammar, which is beyond me, why aren't you a watchdog when it comes to the rule of law?
The 911 investigation got a paltry 13 mil. They never reconstructed planes. They classified nearly everything and released a narrative. People lied on the stand and were never asked to explain it, nor charged with perjury, even after contradicting each other, under oath, in the same morning.
If you have your MS, you must be very well trained in the investigative procedure. Why would you vehemently defend an incomplete investigation of the deaths of 2,971 people?
I'm not flaming, kh300 - I am being honest here. I would think you'd be more upset than anyone about the narrative they delivered to us, including a notable ansence of any mention of WTC7 - which Silverstein specifically blamed on fire damage and told his insurance companies it was NOT a demolition - before collecting 480 mil in insurance money.
congress only had so much money they could use. you know all about all of the other investigations that were done, which completely covered everything. you want another investigation, well what would you like them to do? at this point its a cold case. it wont be reopened until new evidence comes out, or should i say evidence.
congress and the dems all hate bush with a passion. there have been talks of trying to get him impeached. you would think that a 911 cover up would be a perfect way to do it. so why havent they?
i would say 90% of the cases im involved in are solved by confessions. ive had people give evidence when they know there lives are at stake. hundreds of thousands of people are in the witness protection program. even the criminals themselves usually confess. attempted murder cases happen all the time. someone will call us to say someone they knew was planning something, or someone asked me to do a hit for them. even guys involved in organized crime talk. just the planning of 911 would have required thousands of people. one guy has to go up to another guy and ask if they want in on it.
i know secret service guys. they have lives and familys just like the rest of us, same with the fbi. im on an old man baseball team with a bunch of fbi guys, some of them at the very top. they're regular beer drinking football watching guys, with wives and kids at home. they're not keeping secrets about the biggest news story in history. its human nature, people dont keep secrets. and no you cant go around killing people and threatening them. this isnt 1950 anymore, we know about everything. are politicians scumbags -yes. they do scummy shit all the time. but nothing that even compares to a fraction of 911.
heres just one scenario. the terrorists had to go threw the security at the airport. what if one, or several of them got stopped? what if they couldnt take over the planes? so did someone tell all of the tsa and airport police to let those guys on the planes? i could give 100 scenarios like that,,i think your smart enough to understand that too many people would have been involved. you wont admit it so guess what you do.. you just start creating stupid theories. "well they didnt actually use planes",, "there wernt even terrorists",, "they used bombs instead",, "they used holograms".. you can make up whatever story you want, but nobody that can do anything about it is gonna care. you can go ahead and continue to waste away your life trying to convice people but what does it matter? you can have 99% of the population believing in your storys, but nothing will ever happen.
