Author Topic: Arnold  (Read 3099 times)

Platz

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Getbig!
Arnold
« on: May 05, 2007, 12:52:13 PM »


Discuss

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: Arnold
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2007, 12:53:06 PM »
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: Arnold
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2007, 12:53:17 PM »
I believe he is doing "The Tea-pot."
P

Platz

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 562
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2007, 12:54:22 PM »
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.
Why?

Rami

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8120
  • One Hundred Percent
Re: Arnold
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2007, 01:16:24 PM »
because he wasn't good enough

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Arnold
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2007, 01:20:10 PM »
Arnold? Definitely overlooked in bodybuilding history.  They should have made a bigger deal about this guy.

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: Arnold
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2007, 01:24:22 PM »
Finally a thread about Arnold.  We need one on Coleman too ::)

CARTEL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
  • Have a good time, all the time.
Re: Arnold
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2007, 01:26:59 PM »
Finally a thread about Arnold.  We need one on Coleman too ::)

What about Yates? Oh it's on now!

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Arnold
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2007, 02:20:06 PM »
Finally a thread about Arnold.  We need one on Coleman too ::)

LOL.. Not to forget Jay Cutler, Franco Columbu, Zane, etc
I am a mini beast

Nuge

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 447
Re: Arnold
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2007, 04:21:05 PM »
I believe he is doing "The Tea-pot."

LMAO!  ;D
Repent, or join me!

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2007, 08:22:56 PM »


Discuss

That physique is better than the current Mr. O's. If he stepped on stage like that today, he should still win. Zero progress in 33 years.

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2007, 08:28:52 PM »
Here they are compared.

dragonheart

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 513
Re: Arnold
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2007, 09:35:26 PM »
arnolds arms > cutler

Eric2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Arnold
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2007, 11:58:36 PM »
That physique is better than the current Mr. O's. If he stepped on stage like that today, he should still win. Zero progress in 33 years.

  While I agree with you that Arnold could and should win with this pictured physique in todays line-up. I do not agree with the zero progress in 33 years. First of all, the human body is only cabable of so much improvement in muscular mass and quality. There really are limitations to everything in life. Bodybuilding is not really a sport, more of a pagent. I do not care what anyone says or thinks about this. Therefor at a pagent natural genetics is what generally comes first then overall presentation 2nd, then talent and charisma.
    Bodybuilding has stepped up in some areas such as the leg dept. It has scaled down in the presentation dept. Too many guys look like pharmacutical blimps. No guy like this can live very long nor have a quality lifestyle. Most pro-bodybuilders are so out of shape that fucking would leave them in near cardiac arrest. Yes most current pros are out of shape. Listen to the way they talk when they are just walking around, they sound as though they just ran a 5 mile run.
   Bodybuilding has most definetly regressed.
h

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: Arnold
« Reply #14 on: May 06, 2007, 01:10:13 AM »
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.

You've obviously been smoking some bad crack!

Pollux

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7441
  • I'm kind of a big deal!
Re: Arnold
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2007, 06:36:53 AM »
Summary: Way hyped, way overrated.

Way hatin'.



Dballn247

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6081
  • That's how I roll.
Re: Arnold
« Reply #16 on: May 06, 2007, 06:56:06 AM »


Since it hasn't been posted yet,

All Drugs!!!
\

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Arnold
« Reply #17 on: May 06, 2007, 07:20:58 AM »
because he wasn't good enough

One of getbig's idiots right here folks ::)

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Arnold
« Reply #18 on: May 06, 2007, 07:28:00 AM »
  While I agree with you that Arnold could and should win with this pictured physique in todays line-up. I do not agree with the zero progress in 33 years. First of all, the human body is only cabable of so much improvement in muscular mass and quality. There really are limitations to everything in life. Bodybuilding is not really a sport, more of a pagent. I do not care what anyone says or thinks about this. Therefor at a pagent natural genetics is what generally comes first then overall presentation 2nd, then talent and charisma.
    Bodybuilding has stepped up in some areas such as the leg dept. It has scaled down in the presentation dept. Too many guys look like pharmacutical blimps. No guy like this can live very long nor have a quality lifestyle. Most pro-bodybuilders are so out of shape that fucking would leave them in near cardiac arrest. Yes most current pros are out of shape. Listen to the way they talk when they are just walking around, they sound as though they just ran a 5 mile run.
   Bodybuilding has most definetly regressed.

Wait, if it's regressed, then that's ZERO progress.  ::) So you DO agree with me.

rjp

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: Arnold
« Reply #19 on: May 06, 2007, 08:06:10 AM »
Still the best Olympia champ to combine size w/o the bloat. Shame he's hardly brought up in these "who's the best" debates. 80's bodybuilders in general were the peak of the "sport" IMO.


Eric2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Arnold
« Reply #20 on: May 06, 2007, 10:41:01 AM »
Wait, if it's regressed, then that's ZERO progress.  ::) So you DO agree with me.

   no, like I said. the human body can only go so far drugs or not. So to expect a constant state of progress is really foolish. My point with not agreeing with you was based on this as well as the fact that it has regressed. A point that which you did not make. Kinda' like that whole positive negative thing in math. Zero progress means that it is equall to what was. Regression is a negative to what was.
    Savvy?
h

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: Arnold
« Reply #21 on: May 06, 2007, 10:41:25 AM »
Still the best Olympia champ to combine size w/o the bloat. Shame he's hardly brought up in these "who's the best" debates. 80's bodybuilders in general were the peak of the "sport" IMO.


i know massive16 inch arms and 20 inch quads i cant beleive nobody smashed on him .
i

Stark

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22988
Re: Arnold
« Reply #22 on: May 06, 2007, 11:32:07 AM »
i know massive16 inch arms and 20 inch quads i cant beleive nobody smashed on him .

He looks phantastic in that picture, I wish all bodybuilders would strive a physique like that.

dragonheart

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 513
Re: Arnold
« Reply #23 on: May 06, 2007, 07:42:43 PM »
Haney is great, I think his torso is possibly the best in bodybuilding history.  If his arms were a little bigger he would look totally unreal and have the best physique of all time imo.  Hes not mentioned very much because hes a nice guy and not very controversial