nope, those are stereotypical metros . . .
real cavemen = mike ditka, mike singletary
it's all moot anyway . . . civilization has almost completely ruined sex by saddling it w all this "cultural value" baggage. If I ever get married, I'm going to go to Borneo for my honeymoon, and i won't shave for a month and i'll knife pigs for dinner (one of the advantages of being a texas boy is actually knowing how to do that).
You can not seperate sex or any other social phenomenon from the culture it's practised in, people define culture, culture defines people.
That doesn't mean sex is constantly an explicitly culturally laden activity, thank god it's not. There are some scenarios where it's smart to be weary of the consequences of our cultural values and how they suppress or empower certain people.
Btw you don't need to get married to get a tribal sabbatical, I've seen some travel agencies exploring this back to basics idea.
What do you guys feel is the difference between a dandy and a metrosexual?
I consider myself a bit of a dandy, I like clothes with a sleek tailored fit, nice classy italian shoes with a bit of a twist.
I look after myself, but I don't have manicures or pedicures, I do pluck the odd eyebrow hair but no more. I steer clear of make up or ascessoiries and tats. I like myself 'au natural'. I think a metro is more victimised by the L'Orealists of today's society, the idea that we should invest ample amounts of time and money on easthethic enhancers just to come by.