That's pretty speculative 240. Even then, no reason to blow it. they had legit reason to seal it and no way to predict if anything would hit it from the WTC's.
sealing it is one thing. destroying it is another. If you just committed the crime of the century, would you prefer to 'seal' it, or delete it? Besides, there was $450 mil insurance $ on that building, and an asbestos bill double that.
That's pretty speculative 240. Even then, no reason to blow it. they had legit reason to seal it and no way to predict if anything would hit it from the WTC's.
IF 1/2 was a controlled demo, then yes, there was VERY good way to predict what would hit if from the towers, 350 yards away. simple demolition, man. come on... they run computer models, they know where the shit will land.
