Author Topic: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats  (Read 15854 times)

ngm21084

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
  • D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #50 on: January 20, 2008, 09:02:40 AM »
i thought the win record was like 20 games or 21 games already held by the pats...?

gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #51 on: January 20, 2008, 10:45:57 AM »
i thought the win record was like 20 games or 21 games already held by the pats...?

  That's not possible.

ngm21084

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
  • D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #52 on: January 20, 2008, 10:54:16 AM »
not in a single season...just most consecutive wins in a row...

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #53 on: January 20, 2008, 10:58:09 AM »
not in a single season...just most consecutive wins in a row...

From:      http://www.profootballhof.com/history/release.jsp?release_id=1306


21 Games
New England
Patriots
2003-2004
Win    Date    Opponent, Score
1    Oct. 5    Tennessee Titans, 38-30
2    Oct. 12    New York Giants, 17-6
3    Oct. 19    at Miami Dolphins, 19-13 (OT)
4    Oct. 26    Cleveland Browns, 9-3
5    Nov. 3    at Denver Broncos, 30-26
6    Nov. 16    Dallas Cowboys, 12-0
7    Nov. 23    at Houston Texans, 23-20 (OT)
8    Nov. 30    at Indianapolis Colts, 38-34
9    Dec. 7    Miami Dolphins, 12-0
10    Dec. 14    Jacksonville Jaguars, 27-13
11    Dec. 20    at New York Jets, 21-16
12    Dec. 27    Buffalo Bills, 31-0
13    Jan. 10 *    Tennessee Titans, 17-14
14    Jan. 18 *    Indianapolis Colts, 24-14
15    Feb. 1 **    Carolina Panthers, 32-29
16    Sept. 9    Indianapolis Colts, 27-24
17    Sept. 19    at Arizona Cardinals, 23-12
18    Oct. 3    at Buffalo, 31-17
19    Oct. 10    Miami Dolphins, 24-10
20    Oct. 17    Seattle Seahawks, 30-20
21    Oct. 24    New York Jets, 13-7
Streak Ended    Oct. 31    at Pittsburgh Steelers, 20-34
E

ngm21084

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
  • D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #54 on: January 20, 2008, 10:59:16 AM »
yea thats what i was talking about again danielson with the undoubtable stats thanks bro

MB_722

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11173
  • RIP Keith
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #55 on: January 20, 2008, 11:56:25 AM »
it's good both games are outdoors


tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #56 on: January 20, 2008, 06:38:03 PM »
My point was there have been three regular season team that went undefeated in NFL history. Two of those team during a period where the NFL was totally different then it is today. Those season where also not 16 games. Your right what the pats have done this year is nothing special at all.As it stands the pats are the only undefeated 16 game winner in NFL history. when the dolphins did it over 14 games they played one team with a winning record I believe.

If the pats win today they will be the only team in NFL history to win 18 straight games in a season. They are the greatest offensive team in NFL history which imo is a great achievment.

If the pats dont win the superbowl it will be a huge letdown , but they will be far from nothing special because of that.

I'm not disagreeing with your points...

Except, if they do not win the superbowl... They will go down in the record books just like the Bears did... In 20 years, no one will care.

If they win the superbowl, then they will be ELITE and without a doubt the greatest single season team in the history of football.

I don't want to hear about the "modern" era of football blah blah... The modern era technically makes it easier... More penalties... No hitting the QB... You can't do things that you could do in the league even 10 years ago.

The modern era makes it EASIER as far as play style is concerned... Where it makes it harder is salary caps and free agency... It's much harder to "stack the deck" so to speak, even though I will admit, Bill  B, did a great job of doing that this year.

Congratulations to the Pats for the AFC championship... Good luck in a couple of weeks.

ngm21084

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
  • D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #57 on: January 21, 2008, 03:26:22 AM »
i was off about the score but was on for the 100+ yards for maroney....

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #58 on: January 21, 2008, 07:49:12 AM »
The Chargers wont be able to handle to cold New England weather.Brady and co are going to walk all over the Chargers by 26.


NE was lucky that the Chargers didn't change QBs. If they had and had been able to score any TDs they could have won.

OzmO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22808
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #59 on: January 21, 2008, 09:42:36 AM »
NE was lucky that the Chargers didn't change QBs. If they had and had been able to score any TDs they could have won.

That's a stretch and a major assumption all becuase the back up had a good drive versus the colts.

ngm21084

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
  • D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #60 on: January 21, 2008, 09:50:53 AM »
the chargers are lucky they scored anything at all....and the defense is going to stop the giants and the offense is going to nickel dime across the middle because the giants secondary suck and they will be playing a cover 3 trying to prevent the long ball from happening..also remember that the weather in arizona is going to be perfect passing weather  ;D

body88

  • Guest
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #61 on: January 21, 2008, 10:08:20 AM »
NE was lucky that the Chargers didn't change QBs. If they had and had been able to score any TDs they could have won.

Volek is a carrer backup who has played 4 games over his career. The chargers could not score in the red zone because the pats d would not let them. Rivers is far better then Volek , and thats why rivers starts and Volek sits. Just because Volek had one good series vs the colts you think he is a good pro? The guy has played four games in 12 years.

The chargers are lucky brady had a bad game. If Stallworth had not tipped a ball into a chargers db's hands the pats would have scored. If it was not 10 degrees out the score would have been higher. If Many pats recievers did not drop balls thing's would be different. If Maroney was not tripped up several times when he broke into the secondary the pats would have scores more. If, if , if............

None of that happened so none of it matters. You can apply the if card to every game in history. Most fan with sour grapes do that.

Not saying you have sour grapes, I know you dont care either way , just saying. Give the pats defense the credit they deserve. The chargers could not score because the pats d would not allow them to.






pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #62 on: January 21, 2008, 10:14:17 PM »
That's a stretch and a major assumption all becuase the back up had a good drive versus the colts.

Not a stretch at all based on evidence of only a week ago, actually. Most of the half time guys including Cower agree with me.

The only sure thing, which you've overlooked is that keeping an injured QB in there resulted in zero TDs. A backup couldn't have done much worse.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #63 on: January 21, 2008, 10:15:32 PM »
Volek is a carrer backup who has played 4 games over his career. The chargers could not score in the red zone because the pats d would not let them. Rivers is far better then Volek , and thats why rivers starts and Volek sits. Just because Volek had one good series vs the colts you think he is a good pro? The guy has played four games in 12 years.

The chargers are lucky brady had a bad game. If Stallworth had not tipped a ball into a chargers db's hands the pats would have scored. If it was not 10 degrees out the score would have been higher. If Many pats recievers did not drop balls thing's would be different. If Maroney was not tripped up several times when he broke into the secondary the pats would have scores more. If, if , if............

None of that happened so none of it matters. You can apply the if card to every game in history. Most fan with sour grapes do that.

Not saying you have sour grapes, I know you dont care either way , just saying. Give the pats defense the credit they deserve. The chargers could not score because the pats d would not allow them to.



You have absolutely no objectivity, and continue to do nothing but pander to NE. Extremely boring and predictable, made worse by your propensity for the equivalent of internet diahhrea in your posts-no one's reading after the first coupla paragraphs.

In addition, because you think within the box at all times, you make silly assumptions such as the one about Volek. After your very mistaken assumptions last year about Moss' inability to fit in to NE's team, one would think that you would learn from this debacle instead you keep repeating the same mindset.

Geo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3782
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #64 on: January 21, 2008, 10:21:14 PM »
If I was Turner I would have put Volek in just to change a chemistry that was'nt working in the first half.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #65 on: January 21, 2008, 10:22:23 PM »
If I was Turner I would have put Volek in just to change a chemistry that was'nt working in the first half.

Absolutely. Common sense that there wasn't much downside and potentially strong upside given that the starter wasn't doing much.

Common sense is in short supply here, the NE maniacs think they know football and don't grasp what you just said. ::)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #66 on: January 21, 2008, 10:25:39 PM »
Brady limping..

NEW YORK (AP) -- Patriots quarterback Tom Brady was photographed Monday with what appears to be walking cast on his right foot.

Video
http://www.tmz.com/tmz_main_video?titleid=1386375873

Spoony Luv

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1385
  • FROM UP ABOVE!!!
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #67 on: January 21, 2008, 11:45:31 PM »
Brady limping..

NEW YORK (AP) -- Patriots quarterback Tom Brady was photographed Monday with what appears to be walking cast on his right foot.

Video
http://www.tmz.com/tmz_main_video?titleid=1386375873

Just a ploy by the NFL and odds makers to bring down the line...

body88

  • Guest
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #68 on: January 22, 2008, 06:11:05 AM »

You have absolutely no objectivity, and continue to do nothing but pander to NE. Extremely boring and predictable, made worse by your propensity for the equivalent of internet diahhrea in your posts-no one's reading after the first coupla paragraphs.

In addition, because you think within the box at all times, you make silly assumptions such as the one about Volek. After your very mistaken assumptions last year about Moss' inability to fit in to NE's team, one would think that you would learn from this debacle instead you keep repeating the same mindset.

Pumpster Volek sucks. He has started 4 games in 12 years. The chargers had a far better chance to win with Rivers playing. Rivers was not more effective because the pats d shut him down. I mean you are the guy who claimed woods was erratic and unpredictable. So I mean Im not shocked here.

OzmO

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22808
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #69 on: January 22, 2008, 08:27:57 AM »
Not a stretch at all based on evidence of only a week ago, actually. Most of the half time guys including Cower agree with me.

The only sure thing, which you've overlooked is that keeping an injured QB in there resulted in zero TDs. A backup couldn't have done much worse.

That i don't disagree with in that keeping Rivers in was a mistake, But Cower wasn't firm about his view on it and left the issue open, and even then, we are assuming Voltek could have driven them down the field with passes and scored which i don;t think would have happened.  In this case you really have to give it up for the Pats D.

RUDE BUOY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6227
  • The Franchise
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #70 on: January 22, 2008, 08:31:07 AM »
gentlemen, gentlemen, the better team won. the team who was better prepared, better practiced, and had more class thats who won. and if feels so good that they beat rivers  and the bad boys  ::) the charges were not running a fucken thing but their mouths

Beefjake

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1159
  • Oh fuck it.
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #71 on: January 22, 2008, 12:00:56 PM »
Sprained MCL on LT - doesn't require surgery.

Sprained... Didn't know that was even a injury in the NFL ?


tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #72 on: January 22, 2008, 12:17:37 PM »
Sprained MCL on LT - doesn't require surgery.

Sprained... Didn't know that was even a injury in the NFL ?



I wonder if the fix was in... He looked like he wanted to play and they wouldn't let him.

How odd is that.

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22117
  • #EarlToo
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #73 on: January 22, 2008, 12:24:59 PM »
Not a stretch at all based on evidence of only a week ago, actually. Most of the half time guys including Cower agree with me.

The only sure thing, which you've overlooked is that keeping an injured QB in there resulted in zero TDs. A backup couldn't have done much worse.

i watched cowher for 15 years, he never would've changed qb's

E
E

Gym dude

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 719
Re: AFC championship game Chargers VS Pats
« Reply #74 on: January 22, 2008, 12:27:55 PM »
I  saw and read that article about Brady limping on the The Sports network web site. When I saw the photo of Brady in cast. I was thinking shit. I hope it isn't anying thing major.