The irony of YOU and Hulkster claiming ANYONE photoshopped pics both of you did it in fact Hulkster did it dozen and dozens of time and I did post a photoshop pic I didn't photoshop it that's the difference , Kevin Horton busted Hulkster and his worked screencaps and people busted YOU so to claim I'm the hypocrite is only point the finger at yourself
and Nasser is NO WHERE near Yates from the back or the sides which is exactly why he lost and you post pics from 1998 as proof of how much better Nasser is lol great logic
I gotta agree with ND. he's spot on. Plus, you really do have to beat the champ clearly to take a crown..thats just sport.
all in all , for me anyway, Dorian was the better BB overall. Sure nasser had him beat in certain poses but for a long time the back has been heavily weighted in pro comps. This was because for the 80s, most guys had very comparable front development, so the delineator became rear development.
nowadays its over rated especially when guys are being awarded shows who clearly look like crap in almost all poses from the front, yet have the best backs.
I'd also have to argue that nasser was the most aesthetic of the mass monsters. Nasser never was aesthetic. His front double bi shot was well balanced when he was in his prime, but the rest was ugly. Relaxed he looked like poo and other poses like front lat spread, abs and thigh etc he was an also ran.
people with more legit gripes exist around the place..like lee labrada, kevin levrone (THE most aesthetic big guy) and even schlierkamp.
Even as an amateur, nasser didnt flow and didnt have the right symmetry. So, if you're comparing size, Fux should be mr.o. or maybe dillett at least once?
thats why BB looks at all angles and tallys the score. arguably the contest was close, but for the above reasons and more, he lost.
same thing happened with jay and ronnie, haney and labrada...and this year it has changed thank god..its about time.