WATERBOARDING HISTORY LESSON and the United States. Packed with Facts.

[The True Adonis]

[240 is Back]

haha wow... the info about the liberty building attack was delivered 6 months before we began waterboarding.

And, abu zubadia gave all his actional intel - BEFORE he was waterboarded.  Once he was soaked, there was no more info.

Finally - in the mother of all ironies -
The japanese waterboarded our GIs in WW2 to find out info about... WMD.  Ironic that we nuked them a few months later.  And, when we won the war, we imprisoned or executed the japanese bastards who were doing the waterboarding. 

[The Coach]

Nancy Palosi supported waterbording.

[The True Adonis]

Nancy Palosi supported waterbording.

Try again.

[Bindare_Dundat]

Uh, we support the waterboarding of Nancy Pelosi?

[Rami]

I'm surprised they used waterboarding. As with any method of "torture", information extracted is often fabricated just to avoid further interrogation.

And when Obama says they will not use torture it probably means completely classified from here on.

[drkaje]

You're really that worried about waterboarding the people who gleefully behead captured soldiers?

[headhuntersix]

Yep....shitbag terrorists first..America second.

[BigNBloated]

Yep....shitbag terrorists first..America second.

Yes why not defend those who had plans of attacking the very places our wives, girlfriends, and children visit everyday? 240 chimes in with his bullshit about how wrong it is yet hes armed to the gills when he hits the street ready to plug the next homeless person who walks in an aggressive mannner towards his wife. Get fucking real.

[headhuntersix]

Much like our current idiot president, some of these guys want it both ways, while crying that "America doesn't do that". yet in another thread we'll hear about how we pushed around Latin America, supported dictators, overthrew governments etc. Yet "America doesn't torture...yeah I guess the School of the America's doesn't exist? We do what we have to...they're just ignorant to it until its convient to the arguement.

[a_joker10]

Nancy Pelosi was for water boarding in 2002.
Now she's against it.
No big deal except she wants to prosecute the people that she enabled.

Hypocrite.

http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95773/Nancy_Pelosi_and_waterboarding
If Pelosi's so interested in the truth, said Allahpundit in Hot Air, she should start by being clear about her own involvement. Pelosi admits she was told, in 2002, "that waterboarding could be used but insists she was never told it would be used." That jibes with a 2007 Washington Post story saying Pelosi received a "virtual tour" of secret CIA interrogation centers -- so clearly she was "sufficiently comfortable" with waterboarding to look the other way.

[BigNBloated]

Nancy Pelosi was for water boarding in 2002.
Now she's against it.
No big deal except she wants to prosecute the people that she enabled.

Hypocrite.

http://www.theweek.com/article/index/95773/Nancy_Pelosi_and_waterboarding
If Pelosi's so interested in the truth, said Allahpundit in Hot Air, she should start by being clear about her own involvement. Pelosi admits she was told, in 2002, "that waterboarding could be used but insists she was never told it would be used." That jibes with a 2007 Washington Post story saying Pelosi received a "virtual tour" of secret CIA interrogation centers -- so clearly she was "sufficiently comfortable" with waterboarding to look the other way.

What a weakminded child.

[BM OUT]

What a weakminded child.

I bet she doesnt know the meaning of the word "is" as well.Democrats certainly like to parse words.