Author Topic: Chris Cormier (chest/traps complex) (Read 25843 times)

QuakerOats · « **Reply #25 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:34:13 AM »

Quote from: mon_of_steele on May 13, 2009, 07:24:45 AM

Chris was like Paul Dillet. FUcking amazing genetics and drug response but lazy as shit and no dedication.

yes inclining 405 for reps and flat pressing the 200's for reps requires zero dedication, lots of "lazy" dudes do it.

Deicide · « **Reply #26 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:36:17 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 07:34:13 AM

yes inclining 405 for reps and flat pressing the 200's for reps requires zero dedication, lots of "lazy" dudes do it.

It doesn't if it comes naturally to you. It is relative.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #27 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:37:16 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on May 13, 2009, 07:36:17 AM

It doesn't if it comes naturally to you. It is relative.

hahahahahahaaaa, ok deicide.

wild willie · « **Reply #28 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:42:51 AM »

Quote from: Big_Tymer on May 12, 2009, 10:20:05 PM

hahaha, arent you the guy who couldnt break 170lb while on the sauce? epic hating on guys with a good genetic response to the stuff

X2!!!!!!!!!!

wild willie · « **Reply #29 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:44:10 AM »

Quote from: Croatch on May 12, 2009, 10:53:45 PM

No. You must have me confused with someone else.
I gained 35-40lbs in 2 months in 94'.

If someone has good genetics, great. When someone accomplishes a lot on their own, I give credit to those. If they are heavy drug abusers, sorry, I don't really respect it....neither do most people, outside of getbig that is. $:-\$

quit crying.......the type of bull shit you spew is nauseating! I get so tired of jealous haters.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #30 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:44:36 AM »

Quote from: wild willie on May 13, 2009, 07:42:51 AM

X2!!!!!!!!!!

hahahah, exactly, or the other classic, "he weighs 270 pounds so inclining 455 and flat pressing a pair of 200's is "easy" for him.

Hypo · « **Reply #31 on:** May 13, 2009, 07:49:38 AM »

CC had the best classic structure of all of his peers. He had no weak parts and most of the time came in great shape.

Was a funny guy at expos to meet as well.

jpm101 · « **Reply #32 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:02:19 AM »

The secret is out, being lazy gives superior muscle mass and strength. And if that might be true than maybe training too hard, too often gives less results in return. Not so much being lazy but understanding what is enough and fits your body's needs. Think Cormier and a lot of other Pro's find that out right away. And BB'ing chemical engineering, added to the mix, doesn't hurt either.Too bad Cormier got caught up in clubbing and all the stuff that goes with it.

A lot of extra sized lifters, I have seen and heard of, could be put in that "lazy" class.

spinnis · « **Reply #33 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:06:20 AM »

Dude has used more party drugs over the years then Pete Doherty and made more girls mudsharks then shawn ray and jimi hendrix put togheter

Deicide · « **Reply #34 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:09:53 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 07:37:16 AM

hahahahahahaaaa, ok deicide.

You really don't get that? If you start off running a 5 minute mile it is immeasureably easier to run a 4 minute mile than someone who starts running a 10 minute mile. You don't get that?

jaejonna · « **Reply #35 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:10:13 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on May 13, 2009, 08:06:20 AM

Dude has used more party drugs over the years then Pete Doherty and made more girls mudsharks then shawn ray and jimi hendrix put togheter

and thats a bad thing ? (for him)

spinnis · « **Reply #36 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:13:12 AM »

Quote from: jaejonna on May 13, 2009, 08:10:13 AM

and thats a bad thing ? (for him)

he ruined his body so Yes..

Deicide · « **Reply #37 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:13:59 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on May 13, 2009, 08:13:12 AM

he ruined his body so Yes..

You're the fucking man!

QuakerOats · « **Reply #38 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:17:12 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on May 13, 2009, 08:09:53 AM

You really don't get that? If you start off running a 5 minute mile it is immeasureably easier to run a 4 minute mile than someone who starts running a 10 minute mile. You don't get that?

you've obviously never held anything heavier than 205 in your hands on any pressing movement if you think 405 or 200's db's "come naturally" for anyone.

Deicide · « **Reply #39 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:19:31 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 08:17:12 AM

you've obviously never held anything heavier than 205 in your hands on any pressing movement if you think 405 or 200's db's "come naturally" for anyone.

That is irrelevant. My point was only that where you start from makes a great difference. The analogy with the mile illustrates this. When I first started benching I could barely get 40lbs up for one rep, in relative terms I have made good progress but that wouldn't be good progress for someone who starts at 200lbs.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #40 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:21:08 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on May 13, 2009, 08:19:31 AM

That is irrelevant. My point was only that where you start from makes a great difference. The analogy with the mile illustrates this. When I first started benching I could barely get 40lbs up for one rep, in relative terms I have made good progress but that wouldn't be good progress for someone who starts at 200lbs.

like i said, get up to 315 for even a single on the bench and then we'll talk about how "easy" 405 is for ANYONE.

Deicide · « **Reply #41 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:22:54 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 08:21:08 AM

like i said, get up to 315 for even a single on the bench and then we'll talk about how "easy" 405 is for ANYONE.

I don't think that is within my genetic limits naturally. Maybe one day but unlikely.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #42 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:24:09 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on May 13, 2009, 08:22:54 AM

I don't think that is within my genetic limits naturally. Maybe one day but unlikely.

that's seriously pitiful, no offense, i maybe fat but 315 is a rep weight for me now, even while i'm losing weight.

Deicide · « **Reply #43 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:26:13 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 08:24:09 AM

that's seriously pitiful, no offense, i maybe fat but 315 is a rep weight for me now, even while i'm losing weight.

No one ever denied you were a strong guy Squad.

spinnis · « **Reply #44 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:26:28 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 08:24:09 AM

that's seriously pitiful, no offense, i maybe fat but 315 is a rep weight for me now, even while i'm losing weight.

photos or I'm calling BS.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #45 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:27:36 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on May 13, 2009, 08:26:28 AM

photos or I'm calling BS.

believe it or not i'm down to 237 as of yesterday from 252 a month and a half ago.

spinnis · « **Reply #46 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:28:46 AM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on May 13, 2009, 08:27:36 AM

believe it or not i'm down to 237 as of yesterday from 252 a month and a half ago.

Thats great, whats your goal?

Im sure u gonna post photos when you're done?

QuakerOats · « **Reply #47 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:31:12 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on May 13, 2009, 08:28:46 AM

Thats great, whats your goal?

Im sure u gonna post photos when you're done?

i might, i'm gonna try to get to around 220-225 and keep it there.

Deicide · « **Reply #48 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:31:43 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on May 13, 2009, 08:28:46 AM

Thats great, whats your goal?

Im sure u gonna post photos when you're done?

Du er manen!

spinnis · « **Reply #49 on:** May 13, 2009, 08:31:58 AM »

Quote from: Deicide on May 13, 2009, 08:31:43 AM

Du er manen!

u da maaan

Author Topic: Chris Cormier (chest/traps complex) (Read 25843 times)

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis

spinnis