If you are so sure of what you wrote, why did you need to clarify it to ShootFighter ?
Because based on his post he thought i was saying the WSJ article was a CT.
Not trying to sound condecending here, or meaning to. But that's how conversation works sometimes.
You got 2 issues here, from what i can see:
1. I never directly said the WSJ article was a CT
2. When asked about it, i attempted to clarify it.
Com on, James. The WSJ is a credible news source. It's not prison planet. But i think the article is designed somewhat to freak people out a bit and you got Samson over here fanning the fires. That's why i've taken the attitude about it I have. I even posted a current article tempering the supposed "threat".
Also i did come off as a smart ass initially with your post. I apologize. I was just getting testy with your eye roll because i thought i had clarified myself.