Almost a quarter of Republicans think Obama 'may be the Antichrist'

[Straw Man]

that doesnt make the situation any less hypocritical you numb nut fuck LMFAO

define hypocrisy straw...this is truly going to be one for the getbig politics board hall of fame...

if you in turn go suicide bomb ppl then yes youre a hypocrite....

now please define hypocrisy and tell us why you being ok with them ridiculing makes you not a hypocrite...this is going to be good

I've already defined what would be hypocritical about me criticizing the AntiChristers - I can criticize them and I have no problem if they criticize me therefore I am not a hypocrite

pretty simple isn't it?

No need for 10 pages of ridiculous theory that finds you painted into a corner having to admit that your theory means that no one can criticize suicide bombers without also being a hypocrite

[tonymctones]

I've already defined what would be hypocritical about me criticizing the AntiChristers - I can criticize them and I have no problem if they criticize me therefore I am not a hypocrite

pretty simple isn't it?

No need for 10 pages of ridiculous theory that finds you painted into a corner having to admit that your theory means that no one can criticize suicide bombers without also being a hypocrite

LMFAOROTLC

except thats not using the definition of hypocrite you brainiac..LMFAO when did we start being able to to define words how we wanted?

use your favorite database wiki and look up hypocrite you know what nvm ill do it for you

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrite

"Hypocrisy is the act of persistently pretending to hold beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually hold. Hypocrisy is thus a kind of lie.

For example, a man who complains of cars speeding down his street, but speeds himself would be considered a hypocrite
"

where in there does it say that if your ok with being a hypocrite it makes you not a hypocrite....tell me how being ok with them ridiculing you makes a difference in terms of the definition of the term 

LOL this is classic shit man I once thought your account was controlled by a high school kid, I began to doubt myself but seeing the idiocy youve displayed here makes me think my first assertion was correct...if im wrong then its all the more pathetic

[Deicide]

cant get audio...but if you seem to think im wrong please do tell...

you think being ok with being called a hypocrite makes him less of a hypocrite?

do tell

give us your definition of hypocrisy and tell us why straw is not being hypocritical...please do

Well, I do not agree with you but that was already known. Seeing on how everything in human life functions on probablities and Christian mythology being extremely unlikely, basing any serious decision on such things would be silly. By the same token, these selfsame Christians would equally ridicule Muslims on the fatuousness of their beliefs. It cuts both ways; to be honest I think you are secretly sympathetic to the Christian cause.

[tonymctones]

Well, I do not agree with you but that was already known. Seeing on how everything in human life functions on probablities and Christian mythology being extremely unlikely, basing any serious decision on such things would be silly. By the same token, these selfsame Christians would equally ridicule Muslims on the fatuousness of their beliefs. It cuts both ways; to be honest I think you are secretly sympathetic to the Christian cause.

what is the probability of God existing? if its quantifiable then you should be able to quantify it and please give the reasoning...however unlikely you feel if may be its still not positive one way or the other and until it is you and others should refrain from stating it as a certainty...

I agree it certainly does cut both ways this is why I try not to criticize others for their beliefs...and I consider myself a Christian so of course I would be sympathetic to the Christian cause just like many atheist/agnostics are callous towards it...even though we should all fall into agreement that we are not sure who is right...

[tonymctones]

Well, I do not agree with you but that was already known. Seeing on how everything in human life functions on probablities and Christian mythology being extremely unlikely, basing any serious decision on such things would be silly. By the same token, these selfsame Christians would equally ridicule Muslims on the fatuousness of their beliefs. It cuts both ways; to be honest I think you are secretly sympathetic to the Christian cause.

and also my post was not geared towards my argument for my faith simply straws argument that he is not being hypocritical...

[Deicide]

what is the probability of God existing? if its quantifiable then you should be able to quantify it and please give the reasoning...however unlikely you feel if may be its still not positive one way or the other and until it is you and others should refrain from stating it as a certainty...

I agree it certainly does cut both ways this is why I try not to criticize others for their beliefs...and I consider myself a Christian so of course I would be sympathetic to the Christian cause just like many atheist/agnostics are callous towards it...even though we should all fall into agreement that we are not sure who is right...

You speak of God...I speak of gods. Your god is as likely as any other of the many dead gods humans formerly worshipped. It cannot be precisely quantified of course but that is not necessary. There is much scientific and archaeoglical evidence that shows the Bible to be bunk so it can follow that Christianity is bunk.

[tonymctones]

You speak of God...I speak of gods. Your god is as likely as any other of the many dead gods humans formerly worshipped. It cannot be precisely quantified of course but that is not necessary. There is much scientific and archaeoglical evidence that shows the Bible to be bunk so it can follow that Christianity is bunk.

I apologize I meant god even though I typed God force of habit but youre correct. Well if it cant be quantified than it could well be 50/50 and it depends on how you interpret the Bible my friend...

[Dos Equis]

How did this thread get to be 9 pages long?  What in the world?  lol   

[Deicide]

I apologize I meant god even though I typed God force of habit but youre correct. Well if it cant be quantified than it could well be 50/50 and it depends on how you interpret the Bible my friend...

50/50 is NOT the default probability as you well know...

[Hugo Chavez]

I live in the Bronx and there are a few Churches in my area but not many.

hahahaha....

http://www.churches-in.com/new+york/Bronx/

[Soul Crusher]

hahahaha....

http://www.churches-in.com/new+york/Bronx/

Ha Ha!   

[SAMSON123]

Let it be known that SAMSON posts threads that are the crux of debate, discussion, fighting, name calling, infighting and a back hand or two...I will accept my award now for contributing to a discussion that has raged on for 9 million pages and still has not allowed one or the other to make firm the statement that Obama is or even maybe is the AntiChrist. Interesting discussion though...

[Deicide]

hahahaha....

http://www.churches-in.com/new+york/Bronx/

Well, why are they never up in your face like in Wyoming...?

[Soul Crusher]

Well, why are they never up in your face like in Wyoming...?

Dont know.  But , I'm telling you, the next you walk around the boroughs, just look at how many store fronts are churchs. 

[tonymctones]

50/50 is NOT the default probability as you well know...

well if there are 2 outcomes then the probability is 50/50 unless you can prove otherwise the default is 50/50 with 2 options

[Hugo Chavez]

Well, why are they never up in your face like in Wyoming...?

From what I can see, looks like you guys have it worse than we do


In the Bronx:

[Soul Crusher]

Boggie Down Bronx Bro!

[Straw Man]

LMFAOROTLC

except thats not using the definition of hypocrite you brainiac..LMFAO when did we start being able to to define words how we wanted?

use your favorite database wiki and look up hypocrite you know what nvm ill do it for you

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrite

"Hypocrisy is the act of persistently pretending to hold beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually hold. Hypocrisy is thus a kind of lie.

For example, a man who complains of cars speeding down his street, but speeds himself would be considered a hypocrite
"

where in there does it say that if your ok with being a hypocrite it makes you not a hypocrite....tell me how being ok with them ridiculing you makes a difference in terms of the definition of the term 

LOL this is classic shit man I once thought your account was controlled by a high school kid, I began to doubt myself but seeing the idiocy youve displayed here makes me think my first assertion was correct...if im wrong then its all the more pathetic

how exactly does that definition make me a hypocrite

I think people who believe in that Obama is the antichrist are nutty

I actually hold that belief and my words and deeds are consistent so where is the hypocrisy

btw - why haven't you reposted your own tortured, convoluted and borderline retarded defintion again

[tonymctones]

how exactly does that definition make me a hypocrite

I think people who believe in that Obama is the antichrist are nutty

I actually hold that belief and my words and deeds are consistent so where is the hypocrisy

btw - why haven't you reposted your own tortured, convoluted and borderline retarded defintion again

LOL my definition is consistent with that one 

you ridicule ppl for believing in the anti christ without proof then turn around and say he doesnt exist without proof...do the math there hoss

a man who complains of cars speeding down his street, but speeds himself would be considered a hypocrite

a man who condemns ppl for believing something without proof, but believes in something without proof would be considered a...

[Straw Man]

LOL my definition is consistent with that one 

you ridicule ppl for believing in the anti christ without proof then turn around and say he doesnt exist without proof...do the math there hoss

a man who complains of cars speeding down his street, but speeds himself would be considered a hypocrite

a man who condemns ppl for believing something without proof, but believes in something without proof would be considered a...

I've done the math dipshit

I've done it repeatedly and showed it to you in terms that even a retarded 3rd grader could probably understand but some how you're still confused

let's try one last  time

1.  I'm  sure we can agree that no one can prove true or false any core beliefs of  any religion or as you so clumsily wrote "disprove religion"

Yes or No?

If Yes then by your standard no one can ever ridicule anyone elses religious belief without being a hypocrite

Correct?

[tonymctones]

I've done the math dipshit

I've done it repeatedly and showed it to you in terms that even a retarded 3rd grader could probably understand but some how you're still confused

let's try one last  time

1.  I'm  sure we can agree that no one can prove true or false any core beliefs of  any religion or as you so clumsily wrote "disprove religion"

Yes or No?

If Yes then by your standard no one can ever ridicule anyone elses religious belief without being a hypocrite

Correct?

sigh you can still criticize religion the hypocritical part comes from criticizing someone for believing in something without proof and then turning around an believing in something without proof...if you dont criticize them for beliving in that religion than...do the math...

[Deicide]

well if there are 2 outcomes then the probability is 50/50 unless you can prove otherwise the default is 50/50 with 2 options

What 2 outcomes are there? Either the Christian god is real or not? What if Zeus is real or not? 50/50 is bogus. You are declaring, by fiat that it is 50/50 without evidence yourself.

[Straw Man]

sigh you can still criticize religion the hypocritical part comes from criticizing someone for believing in something without proof and then turning around an believing in something without proof...if you dont criticize them for beliving in that religion than...do the math...

LOL - dude this is the funniest thing you're ever written

you just wrote that I can criticize religion and that it's only hypocrtical if I criticize them for believing something without proof and while believing something without proof

correct?

can you give me an example of something I can criticize (with proof of course) without being a hypocrite

[tonymctones]

LOL - dude this is the funniest thing you're ever written

you just wrote that I can criticize religion and that it's only hypocrtical if I criticize them for believing something without proof and while believing something without proof

correct?

can you give me an example of something I can criticize (with proof of course) without being a hypocrite

oh my goodness dude, following the definition of hypocrisy you can criticize anybody but its hypocritical if you do what your ridiculing them of...ok that was simply an example...

[Straw Man]

oh my goodness dude, following the definition of hypocrisy you can criticize anybody but its hypocritical if you do what your ridiculing them of...ok that was simply an example...

where's the example of non-hypocrital criticism of a religious belief

come on man, this is your nutty theory, surely you must be able to scratch up at least one example