Author Topic: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge  (Read 3285 times)

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #25 on: January 24, 2012, 06:09:58 PM »

Uploaded by BirtherReportDotCom on Jan 23, 2012
Fox News: Judge Orders Obama To Appear At Georgia Eligibility Hearing - 1/23/2012 - http://www.BirtherReport.com


Unfortunately, what Orly is not telling these people who she convinced to file charges is that when they are dismissed, they will have to pay court cost and attorney fees.  That's what happenned in Alabama to Harold Sorensen and many others.  Lt Col Terry Lakin had to serve 6 months in prison and was dismissed from the Army (Same as a dishonorable discharge to Military Officers). 


However Orly doesn't have to pay shit because she's the lawyer and gets these stooges to file suit.  Once they lose...off that bitch disappears to find more gullible idiots.

That's why this shit needs to stop....its ridiculous and its hurting a lot of people
A

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #26 on: January 24, 2012, 06:10:05 PM »
This issue needs to die, die, die.

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #27 on: January 24, 2012, 06:11:52 PM »
Amazingly enough, it was published here what happenned to Harold Sorensen

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/alabama-judge-orders-military-veteran.html
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #28 on: January 24, 2012, 08:42:44 PM »
An attorney for a Georgia voter questioning President Barack Obama's eligibility for the March 6 primary said the president probably won't attend a hearing on the issue Thursday, even though a subpoena compelling his appearance stands.

Van R. Irion, who represents plaintiff David Welden, acknowledged Monday that Obama likely will avoid the trial-like proceeding before Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings Deputy Chief Judge Michael M. Malihi.

At issue are claims that Obama either wasn't born in the United States or that he's ineligible for re-election because his father wasn't a U.S. citizen—even though he released copies of Hawaii birth documents and other presidents had foreign-born parents
.
Malihi on Friday rejected Obama's motion to quash a subpoena for the president to appear, saying the president and his attorney Michael K. Jablonski failed to outline the legal authority for their argument. Jablonski's motion to quash said a subpoena requiring Obama's appearance for an administrative hearing was unreasonable given the president's other duties.
"I fully expect Mr. Jablonski to refile on behalf of the president a renewed motion to quash with some citations, and I expect that would probably be granted," said Irion.
Obama hadn't sought reconsideration in filings with the court by Monday. Jablonski, who has served as an attorney for the Democratic Party of Georgia, and the Obama re-election campaign declined to comment.
The president's other options include ignoring the subpoena or appealing to Superior Court. If he refuses to appear, the administrative hearings judge may refer the case to Superior Court for a finding of contempt of court, according to the rules of the Office of State Administrative Hearings.
"I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a contempt order come out if in fact Mr. Obama doesn't show up and if he doesn't renew his motion to quash and get it granted," Irion said.
Malihi's order said Obama didn't explain why the subpoena was unreasonable, oppressive, irrelevant or immaterial, which are grounds for quashing a subpoena.
"Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing," Malihi wrote. "This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority."
Plaintiffs seeking Obama's appearance don't say what they would gain from having him attend the hearing on his status. Orly Taitz, a California attorney who represents one of the plaintiffs and is a leader of the so-called "birther" movement questioning the president's eligibility, said she issued the subpoena.
Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961, according to birth documents released by his campaign and newspaper birth notices published at the time. His mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, was a U.S. citizen who was born in Kansas, and his father, Barack Obama Sr., was born in Kenya, which plaintiffs say made him a British citizen.

The plaintiffs apparently believe that the U.S. Constitution's requirement that only a "natural born citizen" may be president prevents candidates with only one U.S. citizen parent.
Some of the plaintiffs also doubt the veracity of Obama's birth documents and say he hasn't proven his U.S. citizenship.

"We need a stronger check against foreign influence, so the natural born citizen issue came up," said plaintiff David Farrar, a retired Miami court reporter who now lives in Cedartown and is represented by Taitz. "If you claim executive power, you have to prove it, not presume it."

Staff Reporter Mark Niesse

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #29 on: January 24, 2012, 08:44:07 PM »
I would definitely pay for Obama and the gang to go back to Kenya

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #30 on: January 25, 2012, 06:01:55 PM »
Obama's Attorney Jablonski Slapped Down By Georgia SOS Over Obama's Ballot Access Hearing
obamareleaseyourrecords. blogspot.com ^ | 1/25/12 | breitbart
Posted on January 25, 2012 8:57:22 PM EST by Mr. K

Michael Jablonski260 Brighton Road, NEAtlanta, Georgia 30309michael.jablonski@comcast.com

RE: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Mr. Jablonski:I received your letter expressing your concerns with the manner in which the Office of StateAdministrative Hearings ("OSAH") has handled the candidate challenges involving your client andadvising me that you and your client will "suspend" participation in the administrative proceeding. WhileI regret that you do not feel that the proceedings are appropriate, my referral of this matter to anadministrative law judge at OSAH was in keeping with Georgia law, and specifically O.C.G.A. § 21-2-5.As you are aware, OSAH Rule 616-1-2-.17 cited in your letter only applies to parties to a hearing. As thereferring agency, the Secretary of State's Office is not a party to the candidate challenge hearingsscheduled for tomorrow. To the extent a request to withdraw the case referral is procedurally available, Ido not believe such a request would be judicious given the hearing is set for tomorrow morning.In following the procedures set forth in the Georgia Election Code, I expect the administrative law judgeto report his findings to me after his full consideration of the evidence and law. Upon receipt of thereport, I will fully and fairly review the entire record and initial decision of the administrative law judge.Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to myreview of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in theOSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.I certainly appreciate you contacting me about your concerns, and thank you for your attention to thismatter.Sincerely,Brian P. Kemp

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #31 on: January 25, 2012, 06:16:36 PM »
Breaking News: Obama's Attorney In Georgia Ballot Challenge Refuses To Appear At Hearing

Posted on January 25, 2012 5:39:58 PM EST by Obama Exposer

President Obama's private attorney Michael Jablonski has issued a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp confirming that he will not attend the Georgia Access Ballot Challenge hearing set by the Honorable Judge Michael Malihi for January 26, 2012 at 9am.

Here is the letter from Jablonski stating the reasons why he as well as the president will not show:

Hon. Brian P. Kemp

Georgia Secretary of State

214 State Capitol Atlanta, Georgia 30334

via email to Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq.

Re: Georgia Presidential Preference Primary Hearings

Dear Secretary Kemp:

This is to advise you of serious problems that have developed in the conduct of the hearings pending before the Office of State Administrative Hearings. At issue in these hearings are challenges that allege that President Obama is not eligible to hold or run for re-election to his office, on the now wholly discredited theory that he does not meet the citizenship requirements. As you know, such allegations have been the subject of numerous judicial proceedings around the country, all of which have concluded that they were baseless and, in some instances – including in the State of Georgia - that those bringing the challenges have engaged in sanctionable abuse of our legal process.

Nonetheless, the Administrative Law Judge has exercised no control whatsoever over this proceeding, and it threatens to degenerate into a pure forum for political posturing to the detriment of the reputation of the State and your Office. Rather than bring this matter to a rapid conclusion, the ALJ has insisted on agreeing to a day of hearings, and on the full participation of the President in his capacity as a candidate. Only last week, he denied a Motion to Quash a subpoena he approved on the request of plaintiff’s counsel for the personal appearance of the President at the hearing, now scheduled for January 26.

For these reasons, and as discussed briefly below, you should bring an end to this baseless, costly and unproductive hearing by withdrawing the original hearing request as improvidently issued.

It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here—a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country. The State of Hawaii produced official records documenting birth there; the President made documents available to the general public by placing them on his website. “Under the United States Constitution, a public record of a state is required to be given ‘full faith and credit’ by all other states in the country. Even if a state were to require its election officials for the first time ever to receive a ‘birth certificate’ as a requirement for a federal candidate’s ballot placement, a document certified by another state, such as a ‘short form’ birth certificate, or the certified long form, would be required to be accepted by all states under the ‘full faith and credit’ clause of the United States Constitution.” Maskell, “Qualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirement,” Congressional Research Service (November 14, 2011), p.41.

Nonetheless, the ALJ has decided, for whatever reason, to lend assistance through his office—and by extension, yours—to the political and legally groundless tactics of the plaintiffs. One of the attorneys for the plaintiffs has downloaded form subpoenas which she tried to serve around the country. Plaintiff’s attorney sent subpoenas seeking to force attendance by an office machine salesman in Seattle; seeking to force the United States Attorney to bring an unnamed “Custodian of Records Department of Homeland Security” to attend the hearing with immunization records; and asking the same U.S. Attorney to bring the same records allegedly possessed by “Custodian of Records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.” She served subpoenas attempting to compel the production of documents and the attendance of Susan Daniels and John Daniels, both apparently out of state witnesses, regarding Social Security records. She is seeking to compel the Director of Health for the State of Hawaii to bring to Atlanta the “original typewritten 1961 birth certificate #10641 for Barack Obama, II, issued 08.08.1961 by Dr. David Sinclair…,” even though Hawaii courts had dismissed with prejudice the last attempt to force release of confidential records on November 9, 2011. Taitz v. Fuddy, CA No. 11-1-1731-08 RAN.

In Rhodes v. McDonald, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363, 1365 (USDC MD GA, 2009), Judge Clay Land wrote this of plaintiff’s attorney:

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law….

As a national leader in the so-called ‘birther movement,’ Plaintiff’s counsel has attempted to use litigation to provide the ‘legal foundation’ for her political agenda. She seeks to use the Court’s power to compel discovery in her efforts force the President to produce a ‘birth certificate’ that is satisfactory to herself and her followers.” 670 F. Supp. 2d at 1366.

All issues were presented to your hearing officer—the clear-cut decision to be on the merits, and the flagrantly unethical and unprofessional conduct of counsel—and he has allowed the plaintiffs’ counsel to run amok. He has not even addressed these issues—choosing to ignore them. Perhaps he is aware that there is no credible response; perhaps he appreciates that the very demand made of his office—that it address constitutional issues—is by law not within its authority. See, for example, Flint River Mills v. Henry, 234 Ga. 385, 216 S.E.2d 895 (1975); Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.22(3).

The Secretary of State should withdraw the hearing request as being improvidently issued. A referring agency may withdraw the request at any time. Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.17(1). Indeed, regardless of the collapse of proceedings before the ALJ, the original hearing request was defective as a matter of law. Terry v. Handel, 08cv158774S (Superior Court Fulton County, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Supreme Court), reconsideration denied, No. S09A1373. (“The Secretary of State of Georgia is not given any authority that is discretionary nor any that is mandatory to refuse to allow someone to be listed as a candidate for President by a political party because she believes that the candidate might not be qualified.”) Similarly, no law gives the Secretary of State authority to determine the qualifications of someone named by a political party to be on the Presidential Preference Primary ballot. Your duty is determined by the statutory requirement that the Executive Committee of a political party name presidential preference primary candidates. O.C.G.A. § 21-2-193. Consequently, the attempt to hold hearings on qualifications which you may not enforce is ultra vires.

We await your taking the requested action, and as we do so, we will, of course, suspend further participation in these proceedings, including the hearing scheduled for January 26.

Very truly yours,

MICHAEL JABLONSKI Georgia State Bar Number 385850 Attorney for President Barack Obama

cc: Hon. Michael Malihi Van Irion, Esq. Orly Taitz, Esq. Mark Hatfield, Esq. Vincent R. Russo Jr., Esq. Stefan Ritter, Esq. Ann Brumbaugh, Esq. Darcy Coty, Esq. Andrew B. Flake, Esq.

FarRightLooney

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 213
SOS to Obama - Pound Sand
« Reply #32 on: January 25, 2012, 06:21:11 PM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #33 on: January 25, 2012, 06:43:41 PM »
I'm glad Obama might be off the ballot in GA.   That would be great.   Let him explain to the voters why he refuses to release his records. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #34 on: January 26, 2012, 10:16:11 AM »



12:15 p.m. Thursday, January 26, 2012

After hearing evidence with neither President Barack Obama nor his lawyers in attendance, a state administrative law judge on Thursday did not issue a ruling as to whether Obama can be allowed on the state ballot in November.

Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing.

"It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi.

"I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied.

Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing. "It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here -- a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country," Jablonski wrote.

Jablonski also served notice he would boycott the hearing.

In response, Kemp said the hearing to consider the challenges is required by Georgia law. "If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the [Office of State Administrative Hearings] proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril," Kemp wrote.

Thursday's hearing was held before a packed courtroom with almost every seat taken -- except for those at the defendant's table facing the judge.


Find this article at:
http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/no-ruling-in-birther-1318374.html




 Print this page  Close .

FarRightLooney

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 213
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #35 on: January 26, 2012, 10:44:52 AM »
pending further confirmation, but...
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...

OBAMA JUST GOT PUNKED!

I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.

How does the mainstream media spin this?

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #36 on: January 26, 2012, 10:47:07 AM »
 :)

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #37 on: January 26, 2012, 10:57:31 AM »
pending further confirmation, but...
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/

EXCLUSIVE! BREAKING NEWS!...JUDGE WILL ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST OBAMA...

OBAMA JUST GOT PUNKED!

I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama's name not be on the Georgia ballot! All of the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.

How does the mainstream media spin this?

The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge's recommendation. That means that Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia!
Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!


Chuckle....you're going to be very disappointed in what happens next week. 
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #38 on: January 26, 2012, 10:59:52 AM »

Chuckle....you're going to be very disappointed in what happens next week. 

Yeah - the employment report comes out.   All the part time shelf stockers who got laid off will show up in the report.   

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #39 on: January 26, 2012, 11:12:32 AM »
Yeah - the employment report comes out.   All the part time shelf stockers who got laid off will show up in the report.   


Discuss that in another post.  The sad fact is that Obama was not going to win Georgia in the election anyway but once the story is dragged back into the media, its going to allow Obama to use the situation as a trumpet call to arms in the election. 
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #40 on: January 26, 2012, 11:15:01 AM »

Discuss that in another post.  The sad fact is that Obama was not going to win Georgia in the election anyway but once the story is dragged back into the media, its going to allow Obama to use the situation as a trumpet call to arms in the election. 

LOL.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #41 on: January 26, 2012, 01:58:33 PM »
Results Of Obama’s Eligibility Hearing In Georgia
January 26, 2012

By Breaking News 7 Comments






Update: Dean Haskins at Obama Release Your Records is saying that the Judge is entering a default judgement against Obama because he did not appear. This could mean that Obama might not appear on Georgia’s ballot, although the Obama administration will certainly appeal.

Today was an important day in the fight for truth. Despite Obama’s no-show, today’s court proceedings could have a great affect on the eligibility movement as a whole.

A blow by blow of the entire court proceeding was made by Craig Andersen of the The National Patriot. His article is found below. We will be updating this page with a synopsis of what today’s proceedings mean for the entire Obama eligibility movement and what results we might see. In the meantime, read the following blow by blow account:

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.


Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #42 on: January 26, 2012, 06:41:51 PM »
In Hugo's thread I'm saying I hope Google doesn't police conspiracy theories, then I read this non-sensical shit and I start thinking.....well, maybe....

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #43 on: January 26, 2012, 06:44:47 PM »
In Hugo's thread I'm saying I hope Google doesn't police conspiracy theories, then I read this non-sensical shit and I start thinking.....well, maybe....


If Obama continues to default, je will be forced off the ballot in GA. 

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #44 on: January 26, 2012, 07:16:50 PM »
In Hugo's thread I'm saying I hope Google doesn't police conspiracy theories, then I read this non-sensical shit and I start thinking.....well, maybe....


Yea....shame on the judge who thinks that President of the United States doesn't have more important things to do than to deal with obviously frivolous bullshit like this.  Makes Georgia look like the asscrack of the U.S.   ::)


Its already been proven beyond the shadow of a doubt that Obama is a natural born citizen and the fact is that no matter how much paperwork and records are disclosed, some people are just going to argue the latter..... ::)

A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #45 on: January 26, 2012, 07:26:16 PM »
Then why not show up in court and settle it?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #46 on: January 26, 2012, 09:27:06 PM »
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com


She has real perseverance.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #47 on: January 26, 2012, 09:29:17 PM »
This was from the earlier thread just mentioned:

Read more at: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138. By Craig Andresen.

Court is called to order.

Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.

Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.

Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.

Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.

June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.

Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.

It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.

The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.

Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.

Carl Swinson takes the stand.

Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.

2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.

Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.

Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.

RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.

DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.

Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.

Dreams From My Father entered.

Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.

Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.

This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.

At this point, the judge takes a recess.

The judge returns.

David Farrar takes the stand.

Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.

Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.

Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.

State Licensed PI takes the stand.

She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.

Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.

Next witness takes the stand.

This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.

Linda Jordan takes the stand.

Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.

Next witness.

Mr. Gogt.

Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.

Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.

States this is a product of layering.

Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.

Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.

Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.

Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.

Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.

Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigration records.

Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.

Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.

Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.

Taitz takes the stand herself.

Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.

Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.

Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.

And with that, the judge closes the hearing.


Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #48 on: January 27, 2012, 05:10:03 AM »
Then why not show up in court and settle it?

Orly has filed these lawsuits in all 50 states multiple times.  If a sitting president, senator, congressman, etc had to answer every frivolous lawsuit thrown at them then they would never get anything done.  You should know that.    


Its a misuse of the judicial system and a serious waste of tax dollars.  One day, Orly is going to have to pay court costs for all of them but she seems to keep suckering these people to do with without telling them the consequences of doing so.  She's left a bunch of people in serious debt because of this
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Judge Denies Obama's Motion To Quash Subpoenas In Georgia Ballot Challenge
« Reply #49 on: January 27, 2012, 05:20:20 AM »
Orly has filed these lawsuits in all 50 states multiple times.  If a sitting president, senator, congressman, etc had to answer every frivolous lawsuit thrown at them then they would never get anything done.  You should know that.    


Its a misuse of the judicial system and a serious waste of tax dollars.  One day, Orly is going to have to pay court costs for all of them but she seems to keep suckering these people to do with without telling them the consequences of doing so.  She's left a bunch of people in serious debt because of this

Oh please obama has time to party, vacation, and campaign all day he has time for this. 

Once served the summons and complaint, all his lawyer needed to do is file responsive documents attached to the Answer and filed for a motion for Summ Judgment if it was that clear. 

But its not since we all know obama is a liar, a fraud, and the sham wow potus.