Author Topic: The Benghazi Testamonies  (Read 11556 times)

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13095
  • I stop for turtles
The Benghazi Testamonies
« on: May 08, 2013, 09:49:25 AM »
Listening to first testimony (Gregory Hicks), how can anyone side with Hilary on "what difference does it make"?  I'm tempted to use the 'C' word  >:(
:

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2013, 09:51:27 AM »
Listening to first testimony, how can anyone side with Hilary on "what difference does it make"?  I'm tempted to use the 'C' word  >:(

She tried to make it go away by blustering and bullying her way through her "testimony," now the chickens are coming home to roost.

She may be looking 20 years older by the time this is all over.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2013, 09:51:36 AM »
4 people died and hillary and obama lied their fucking asses off to cover up the incompetence

Princess L

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13095
  • I stop for turtles
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2013, 09:55:41 AM »
4 people died and hillary and obama lied their fucking asses off to cover up the incompetence

From the VERY BEGINNING!

 A YouTube video  ::)  F'g "C"
:

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 60010
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2013, 10:17:58 AM »
"It happend along time ago" - Jay "Carnival" Carney

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #5 on: May 08, 2013, 10:37:35 AM »
http://redflagnews.com/headlines/dem-congressman-at-benghazi-hearing-death-is-a-part-of-life


Just fucking wow

This is the typical defintion of a worthless piece of trash.  Elijah Cummings is another worthless shitstain who should be deported somewhere

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2013, 10:42:39 AM »



Unreal - this is the typical Obama slave piece of garbage who defends literally anything this communist shit bag does

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2013, 11:46:09 AM »
"the youtube video was a non issue in libya", Mr Hicks. - [slam duck]



Hillary and Obama are two disgusting traitors and belong in jail. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2013, 11:47:55 AM »
"I was stunned, my jaw dropped," Gregory Hicks Foreign Service Officer and former Deputy Chief of Mission/Chargé d’Affairs in Libya told the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday. Hicks was referring to his reaction of Susan Rice saying that the attack was spontaneous and evolved out of a protest. Representative Gowdy read and email from Beth Jones of the State Department identifying the attackers of the Benghazi consulate as being "affiliated with Islamic terrorists."




Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2013, 11:51:43 AM »
[ Invalid YouTube link ]

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2013, 11:53:43 AM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2013, 12:06:47 PM »
wow 

Fucking wow

FU Obama   FU HITLERY


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2013, 12:09:13 PM »


Package it up with the testimony and all that we now know and the RNC will have quite the ad campaign to fire off if this piece of shit decides to run for President.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #14 on: May 08, 2013, 12:14:22 PM »
They're bring the MSM into this kicking and screaming but I think if this gets any bigger...Obama will sacrifice Hil to the wolves with gleeful pleasure. There is no love lost by all accounts between the Obama and Clinton camps. If thats the case...Hil will hit back. Bill will say some carefully placed comments here and there about god knows what and turn this against Obama. Right now everybody is rowing in the same direction. If the anybody in the MSM wants to make a name for themselves, then maybe they can fracture the story. As it stands now it looks like the whitehouse is full of shit. I want to think better of Hil but they failed and folks died. This could be a case study in how the MSM has and does protect Dems in general and Obama in particular. Ailes and the folks at Fox are giddy right now.

I know for an absolute undisputable fact that a MARSOC unit was told to stand down from going in. I don;'t know when they would have arrived based on the timeline but it would appear that they would have saved some lives. A very good friend was with the unit.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #15 on: May 08, 2013, 12:16:22 PM »
by Joel B. Pollak8 May 2013, 11:32 AM PDT

1. Two "stand-down" orders were given while the Benghazi attacks were in progress.
 
2. The "protest" about a YouTube video was a complete fabrication by the Obama administration.
 
3. Cheryl Mills, Clinton's lawyer at the State Department, told witnesses not to speak to House investigators.
 
4. The diplomatic personnel on the ground acted with incredible, unheralded heroism.
 
5. Democrats came to rebut the eyewitnesses with talking points.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #16 on: May 08, 2013, 12:17:40 PM »
If DOS folks are turining on the Clinton and the admin its serious. I've worked with these people. They tend to be the most touchy feely of the gov agencies...very Lib if anything.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #17 on: May 08, 2013, 12:38:57 PM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #18 on: May 08, 2013, 01:07:15 PM »

syntaxmachine

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2687
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #19 on: May 08, 2013, 02:04:54 PM »
This could be a case study in how the MSM has and does protect Dems in general and Obama in particular.

What do you mean by "the MSM"? Fox News is far and above the king of the hill in the realm of cable news -- so much so that it is fair to say that most (in the logical sense of 'at least 50+1%', i.e., a majority) viewers of cable news receive a rather anti-Democrat, anti-Obama, pro-Republican message (all things considered). Plainly, then, if by "the MSM" you mean all or even most of the media (defined in terms of viewership), you are sorely mistaken. If you simply mean something like 'a majority of news organizations,' you're right but in a trivial way since viewership is what's really relevant here.



http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/cable-cnn-ends-its-ratings-slide-fox-falls-again/cable-by-the-numbers/http://stateofthemedia.org/2012/cable-cnn-ends-its-ratings-slide-fox-falls-again/cable-by-the-numbers/

HLN -- 385,500 viewers
CNN -- 654,500
MSNBC -- 773,000
Fox News Channel -- 1.9 million

I've worked with these people. They tend to be the most touchy feely of the gov agencies...very Lib if anything.

We can't ignore the possibility of individuals protecting their own asses, grandstanding for their own gain, and/or continuing an intra-department rivalry/hatefest of some sort or other. Still, all of this is still consistent with a fuck up at the upper levels, I suppose.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #20 on: May 08, 2013, 02:08:41 PM »

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #21 on: May 08, 2013, 02:16:44 PM »
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/05/08/HICKS-Operators-Furious-When-Given-Order-To-Stand-Down


Unreal - if anyone still supports obama - go jump off a fucking bridge

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #22 on: May 08, 2013, 02:26:32 PM »
W Files Three New Lawsuits Against Obama Administration for Concealing Benghazi


 
More than six months have passed since the 9/11/2012 attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, which killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, and we are no closer to the truth about what happened.  And this is for one reason and one reason only – Obama secrecy.
 
The American people have watched the Obama administration trot out witnesses before congressional committees investigating the attacks.  Americans have watched Obama officials make the rounds on the Sunday morning talk shows.  In the end is more lies and more stonewalling and more broken promises to “get to the bottom of it.”
 


If you would like to receive weekly emails updating you about all of our efforts to fight corruption, please sign up here.
 


* Email 
 




* State:
 
AL AK AS AZ AR CA CO CT DE DC FL GA GU HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MH MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NM NH NJ NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY




Judicial Watch Weekly Update
 


There seems to be a systematic effort by the Obama administration to shield key documentary evidence from the American people.  This is where Judicial Watch is focusing its attention.  JW has filed multiple Freedom of Information Act requests and recently filed three lawsuits against the Obama State Department to try to gain access to records that could shed light on what happened that day, who responded, and how.
 
Benghazi Lawsuit No. 1: JW Seeks U.S. Consulate Videos at Time of Attack
 
Judicial Watch sued the State Department seeking “all videos and photographs” depicting the Benghazi, Libya Consulate between September 10 and September 13, 2012, the period leading up to, during, and immediately following the deadly attack.
 
Specifically, Judicial Watch seeks the following records pursuant to its December 19, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request:
 
“Any and all videos and photographs depicting U.S. Consulate facilities in Benghazi, Libya (including the Special Mission Compound and the Annex) between September 10, 2012, and September 13, 2012, that were provided to the Accountability Review Board (ARB) for Benghazi and/or to any individual member of the ARB.”
 
The State Department acknowledged receiving the Judicial Watch FOIA request on January 4, 2013, and was required by law to respond by February 4, 2013.  So far, no documents have been produced.
 
The Obama administration cannot claim it came up empty in trying to locate the records.  The records exist for certain because they are referenced by the ARB, which was convened by then – Secretary of State Clinton last December, in its final report.
 
In fact, according to ARB Chairman Ambassador Tom Pickering, the Board “reviewed thousands of documents and watched hours of video” during the course of its investigation.  The Obama administration also reportedly shared Benghazi video with certain members of Congress. The State Department, however, has refused to comply with JW’s FOIA seeking access to these materials on behalf of the American people.
 
“It’s an easy guess as to why the Obama administration is refusing to turn these records over. Any video or photos will tell us more about Benghazi – in contrast to the lies and spin coming out of Obama administration officials,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
 
Benghazi Lawsuit Number 2:  JW Seeks Details Regarding Contract with Foreign Security Company
 
In another FOIA lawsuit against the Obama State Department, Judicial Watch seeks access to records concerning a contract totaling nearly $400,000 that was awarded to a foreign firm for “Security Guards and Patrol Services” at the Benghazi Consulate prior to the Benghazi attacks. This contract was signed on February 17, 2012, and May 3, 2012, and at the time was identified only as “Award ID SAQMMA12COO92.”  Judicial Watch filed its lawsuit on February 25, 2013.
 
Specifically, Judicial Watch seeks the following pursuant to a November 7, 2012, FOIA request:
 
Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to the $387,413.68 contract awarded by the Department of State to an unidentified foreign awardee for “Security Guards and Patrol Services.”  According to the record of this expenditure on USASpending.gov, the contract was signed on February 17, 2012, and May 3, 2012, and is identified by Award ID SAQMMA12COO92.
 
The State Department acknowledged receiving the November 7, 2012, Judicial Watch FOIA request on November 12, 2012, and was required by law to respond by December 20, 2012, at the latest.  Yet again, as of the date of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit, JW has not received a meaningful response.
 
And what is suspicious about this contract?
 
According to Breitbart.com, when first questioned about foreign Benghazi security guards on Friday, September 14, 2012, State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland emphatically denied that State had hired any private firm to provide security at the American mission in Benghazi:
 
QUESTION: (Inaudible) the claim was made yesterday that a company that is a spinoff of Blackwater, in fact, proposed or contracted the United States Government for this particular kind of eventuality, and it was caught up in some sort of bureaucratic –
 
MS. NULAND: Completely untrue with regard to Libya.  I checked that this morning.  At no time did we plan to hire a private security company for Libya.
 
QUESTION: Toria [stet], I just want to make sure I understood that, because I didn’t understand your first question.  You said – your first answer.  You said that at no time did you have contracts with private security companies in Libya?
 
MS. NULAND: Correct.
 
However, on September 17, 2012, WIRED magazine broke the story that Nuland had provided false information in her September 14 press conference, saying:  “Contrary to Friday’s claim by State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland that ‘at no time did we contract with a private security firm in Libya,’ the department inked a contract for ‘security guards and patrol services’ on May 3, 2012, for $387,413.68.  An extension option brought the tab for protecting the consulate to $783,000.  The contract lists only ‘foreign security awardees’ as its recipient.”
 
In her daily press briefing on Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Nuland admitted that she had made an “error” concerning the State Department’s hiring of foreign security firms in Benghazi. “There was a group called Blue Mountain Group, which is a private security company with permits to operate in Libya,” Nuland said.  “They were hired to provide local Libyan guards who operated inside the gate doing things like operating the security access equipment, screening cars, that kind of thing.”
 
According to Breitbart.com, Blue Mountain was chosen for the Benghazi security operation because it was willing to sign the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya prohibiting guards from carrying weapons with live ammunition.
 
Benghazi Lawsuit Number 3:  JW Seeks “Doctored” Talking Points Memo
 
Judicial Watch filed a FOIA lawsuit on February 14, 2013, against the Obama Administration’s Office of the Director of National Intelligence seeking access to a controversial “speaking points” memo that seems to suggest that intelligence officials believed from the outset that al Qaeda was behind the attack despite public statements to the contrary issued by Obama administration officials, including UN Ambassador Susan Rice and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
 
Specifically, JW seeks:
 
Any and all memoranda, assessments, analyses, and/or talking points regarding the September 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya and/or the killing of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens produced by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence between September 11, 2012, and September 20, 2012.  This request includes, but is not limited to, the “speaking points” memorandum referred to by Senator Dianne Feinstein during a televised interview on October 17, 2012….
 
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence acknowledged receiving JW’s request on October 19, 2012, and was required by law to respond by November 26, 2012.  However, as of the date of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit, the agency failed to produce any records responsive to the request, indicate when any responsive records will be produced, or demonstrated that responsive records are exempt from production.
 
Regarding the “speaking points” memorandum requested by Judicial Watch, according to the CBS television affiliate in San Francisco, Senator Feinstein said:  “When asked by CBS 5 if there was an intelligence flaw, the senior California senator [Feinstein] who hails from San Francisco replied: ‘I think what happened was the director of intelligence…put out some speaking points on the initial intelligence assessment.  I think that was possibly a mistake.’”
 
Former CIA Director General David Petraeus reportedly testified before Congress that the initial speaking points produced by the CIA “stated there were indications the attack was linked to al Qaeda,” and suggested the terrorism reference was removed sometime during an interagency review process.
 
In the days and weeks following the Benghazi attacks, the Obama administration blamed the incident on a rudimentary Internet video deemed offensive to Muslims.  This false claim was repeated by both Ambassador Rice and Secretary Clinton in multiple public statements and press interviews.
 
For example, at a September 14, 2012, event honoring the four victims of the Benghazi attack, then-Secretary of State Clinton made the following statement:  “We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men.  We’ve seen the rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful video that we had nothing to do with.”
 
Did Hillary Clinton know this was a lie when she said it?  She certainly was in no mood to talk about it during her testimony before Congress.  When asked about the alleged discrepancy between the intelligence community’s assessment and the Obama administration’s public statements during congressional testimony, Ms. Clinton shouted, “What difference does it make?…I personally was not focused on talking points.”
 
“With all of the Benghazi lies coming out of the Obama administration, the only way to get at the truth is to release these records immediately,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.  “The Obama administration’s lawless Benghazi cover-up is a disgrace and an insult to the victims of the attacks and their families.  The Obama Benghazi scandal makes Iran-Contra seem like patty-cake by comparison.”

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #23 on: May 08, 2013, 02:36:55 PM »
it's awesome to see people giving a shit and demanding an actual investigation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The Benghazi Testamonies
« Reply #24 on: May 08, 2013, 03:01:00 PM »
"This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing do to with.”


She said this at the funeral knowing full well it was all lies