I don't have a problem with religious symbols on public property. And I could care less if a handful of dummies are offended by religious symbols. As I've said, I have zero tolerance for paranoid anti-religious extremists. Tolerance doesn't mean you cater to every crybaby in the country.
Yes, why would someone define themselves based on something they don't believe exists. They have clubs, websites, magazines, annual meetings, etc. It's really silly if you actually think about it. The really funny part is when they then model themselves after Christian churches. There is obviously something missing in their lives.
haha exactly, you expect to be tolerated while showing no tolerance, lol at dummies being offended, nice tolerance. Dude why do you even engage me? if you practice tolerance then yes you must be tolerant of everyone.
Tolerance or toleration is a fair, objective, and permissive attitude toward those whose opinions, practices, race, religion, nationality, etc., differ from one's own; freedom from bigotry.
I have never seen, heard or meet with anyone that goes to these churches? how many even fucking exist? I don't think it's silly to base one's life defending a lie perpetuated through the ages to keep people obidient and afraid. Dawkins does it because it effects his work, it suspends critical thinking. So while you may be laughing at his attempt those oppressed by religion, including yours, wont be. The kid who was ass fucked by a priest isn;t laughing, nor is he laughing when he rails against the church and religion. Oh the church condeming condoms in Africa, god doesn't exist but his impact is apparent. That's what they are fighting, your stupid beliefs and the off shoots of them.
You would probably say the same thing during the inquisition, belief was killing it.
