Author Topic: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!  (Read 42373 times)

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #75 on: March 10, 2015, 03:33:19 PM »

Teutonic Knight

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #76 on: March 10, 2015, 03:35:58 PM »

Why are there still apes? 





& U a still African ,  :'( :'( :'(

 8)

Teutonic Knight

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #77 on: March 10, 2015, 03:38:37 PM »
BTW, thanks for the thread Ron.  8)

But Wiggzy U a proponent of fucked up Mayan calendar 2012   :D

TheShape.

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6216
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #78 on: March 10, 2015, 03:39:18 PM »
Not this fucking bullshit again, for fucks sake. Go suck a pepsi can sized schlong Ron Harryington you dumb son of a bitch, people like you are holding humanity back you dirty girl.

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #79 on: March 10, 2015, 03:49:19 PM »
ROFL, getting pwned by a homeschooler

Reality tends to get in the way, doesn't it?

Teutonic Knight

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #80 on: March 10, 2015, 03:50:49 PM »
Reality tends to get in the way, doesn't it?

369 wins  ;D

Teutonic Knight

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10358
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #81 on: March 10, 2015, 03:58:45 PM »

Kill em Ron.  I'm going to lunch.  8)


 :o real Bible lingo  ::)

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48848
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #82 on: March 10, 2015, 04:03:45 PM »
:o real Bible lingo  ::)

Spreading the love of the gospel.  :D
X

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #83 on: March 10, 2015, 04:35:21 PM »
Not this fucking bullshit again, for fucks sake. Go suck a pepsi can sized schlong Ron Harryington you dumb son of a bitch, people like you are holding humanity back you dirty girl.

Yet more nonsense. In deep denial. Utterly deluded. Incapable of rational thought. Total nutcase. It is hard to imagine that you could make a stronger case against atheism if you tried. How is it possible for you to be so completely out of touch with reality? Some individuals are so deficient in intelligence that we must infer that their skulls are empty cavities.

TheShape.

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6216
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #84 on: March 10, 2015, 04:39:54 PM »
Yet more nonsense. In deep denial. Utterly deluded. Incapable of rational thought. Total nutcase. It is hard to imagine that you could make a stronger case against atheism if you tried. How is it possible for you to be so completely out of touch with reality? Some individuals are so deficient in intelligence that we must infer that their skulls are empty cavities.
"Reality."

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #85 on: March 10, 2015, 04:42:58 PM »
“The more I study science, the more I believe in God.”
–Albert Einstein

Today's Creation Moment
James Clerk Maxwell
1 Corinthians 2:5
“That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.” Albert Einstein said that James Clerk Maxwell made greater contributions to physics than anyone except Isaac Newton.
Maxwell developed complex theoretical and mathematical explanations for all the forces in the universe except gravity and nuclear forces. He also made scientific contributions in the fields of thermodynamics and mathematics. In other words, Maxwell was a scientist of gigantic proportions who remains greatly respected today.
By today’s standards, Maxwell would be called a “fundamentalist.” Maxwell lived at the same time as Charles Darwin and was very aware of evolutionary theory. He felt strongly that evolution was anti scientific and wrote a powerful and important refutation of evolutionary writings. He also offered a very careful mathematical refutation of the theory that the solar system had evolved from a cloud of dust and gas.
The great scientist Maxwell believed that Jesus Christ is the Savior that God has provided to deliver humanity from the results of sin – including eternal death. A writing of his, found after his death, states that the motivation for his work was that God had created all things just as Genesis says. And since God has created humans in His image, scientific study is a fit activity for one’s lifework.
Prayer:
Heavenly Father, I pray today for the work of those in science who are convinced that You are indeed the Creator as described in Genesis. Though they are opposed by men, bless their work and move more of our Christian young people to follow in their footsteps. In Jesus’ Name. Amen.

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #86 on: March 10, 2015, 04:49:43 PM »
"Reality."


Face it, son. Science says your beliefs are bullshit. No matter how much you whine and cry about it.

Automation

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1780
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #87 on: March 10, 2015, 04:53:05 PM »
I think this Harrigan fellow is desperately trying to appear like he has had a good formal education. But it is obvious he hasn't. His arguments are infantile and devoid of logic.

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #88 on: March 10, 2015, 04:59:29 PM »
THIS IS CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT EVOLUTION NEVER HAPPENED
1. "a species does not arise gradually by the steady transformation of its ancestors; it appears all at once and "fully formed."" -Gould, Stephen J.
 
2. "The modern theory of evolution does not require gradual change. In fact, the operation of Darwinian processes should yield exactly what we see in the fossil record. It is gradualism we should reject, not Darwinism." (I.E., NO GRADUALISM)
 
3."There is no gradualism in the fossil record...Punctuated equilibrium was invented to describe the discontinuity."" - Evolutionist/Biologist Lyn Marguilis.
 
4. "our failure to note subsequent evolutionary change within them." -Gould, Stephen J.
 
5. Next scientist says the same thing: "The facts of paleontology seem to support creation and the flood rather than evolution. For instance, all the major groups of invertebrates appear "suddenly" in the first fossil ferrous strata (Cambrian) of the earth with their distinct specializations indicating that they were all created almost at the same time." -- Professor Enoch, University of Madras
NOTICE? He said "the facts"
 
6. Niles Eldredge, Gould's partner, concurs with Gould that "most families, orders, classes, and phyla appear rather suddenly in the fossil record, often without anatomically intermediate forms smoothly interlinking evolutionarily derived descendant taxa with their presumed ancestors."
 
7. The late Dr. George Gaylord Simpson admitted, "The uniform, continuous transformation of Hyracotherium into Equus, so dear to the hearts of generations of textbook writers, never happened in nature" (Simpson, 1953, p. 125, emp. added). In his 2000 article in Natural History,

8. Next is Patterson. Dr. Colin Patterson, a senior paleontologist at the British Museum (Natural History), was asked by Luther D. Sunderland why no evolutionary transitions were included in Dr. Patterson's recent book, Evolution. In a personal letter, Patterson said: "I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them."
 
9. PROOF: "Yet Gould and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils." -Patterson
 
BUT THAT'S OK. YOU CAN REFUSE TO READ AND REFUSE TO BE ENLIGHTENED BUT IT'S CALLED WILFUL IGNORANCE.

io856

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #89 on: March 10, 2015, 05:06:37 PM »
Even if evolution is incredibly fallible...
The next logical answer is not intelligent design and there is no proof to suggest that either.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48848
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #90 on: March 10, 2015, 05:07:55 PM »
I think this Harrigan fellow is desperately trying to appear like he has had a good formal education. But it is obvious he hasn't. His arguments are infantile and devoid of logic.

Ron Harrigan

X

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #91 on: March 10, 2015, 05:08:40 PM »
THE UTTER IGNORANCE OF EVOLUTIONISTS:

YOUR CHALLENGE:  In the so-called evolutionary process, what exactly 'evolves'?
EV's ANSWER: "Your ignorance about what evolution actually is won't make evolution go away."

YOUR CHALLENGE:  Explain why many dominant species on Earth went non-evolved for tens of millions of years.
EV's ANSWER: "Your ignorance about what evolution actually is won't make evolution go away."

YOUR CHALLENGE:  Explain how the eye evolved, from what state, and what was its prior purpose.
EV's ANSWER: "Your ignorance about what evolution actually is won't make evolution go away."

YOUR CHALLENGE: Explain the evolution of the Sexual Reproductive system, also, that of the heart.
EV's ANSWER: "Your ignorance about what evolution actually is won't make evolution go away."

YOUR CHALLENGE: Explain why, over millions of years, evolution happened with some apes but not others.
EV's ANSWER: "Your ignorance about what evolution actually is won't make evolution go away."

YOUR CHALLENGE: Explain why the evolution of the Human would result in its type of intelligence, versus all other species.
EV's ANSWER: "Your ignorance about what evolution actually is won't make evolution go away."

PWNED

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #92 on: March 10, 2015, 05:13:13 PM »
Even if evolution is incredibly fallible...
The next logical answer is not intelligent design and there is no proof to suggest that either.

Good grief. You are being deliberately obtuse. As predicted, you miss the point, which is that evolution is rankly refuted by science and reality. In other words, it didn't happen. Nothing evolved or evolves or will evolve. Sorry.

TheShape.

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6216
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #93 on: March 10, 2015, 05:48:32 PM »
Nothing evolved or evolves or will evolve. Sorry.
Beaks of finches, butterflies, polar bears, etc. life adapts and evolves that is a proven fact.

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #94 on: March 10, 2015, 06:17:20 PM »
The atheist silence is most instructive. They have no response to the scientific facts because of the myriad reasons atheism and evolution don't work, the relatively compact history of the universe being one of the most difficult to work around.

Today's Creation Moment
Are Rocks Like Vaults or Sponges?
1 Corinthians 2:7 "But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:"
One of the common methods of finding the age of rocks, and ultimately the age of the Earth, measures the decay of radioactive uranium into lead – the more lead, the older the rock. The method, however, makes some very big assumptions. First, scientists assume there was no lead in the rock when it first formed, but this is unprovable. Then, they assume that rocks are like locked vaults and that no uranium, lead, or the in between decay elements can ever enter or leave the rock.
The fact is, numerous scientific studies show all these assumptions are wrong. Studies have shown that commonly dated rock material can have lead in it as it crystallizes. Other studies have shown that lead, uranium and the other elements important for dating can be removed from the rock by simple weathering or other conditions. In other words, while evolutionary scientists compare rocks to locked vaults, we are learning they are more like sponges. This explains why evolutionary dating methods have found, for example, one part of a rock to be 30 times older than another part of the same rock.
The next time you hear someone say that certain rocks or the fossils in them are millions or billions of years old, just remember that rocks are not like vaults. They are more like sponges that gain or lose elements, making accurate dating impossible. There is no good scientific evidence that the Earth is any older than the few thousand years indicated by the Bible.
Prayer:
I thank You, Lord, that I can trust You as the Rock of Ages. Amen.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40888
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #95 on: March 10, 2015, 06:17:31 PM »
Beaks of finches, butterflies, polar bears, etc. life adapts and evolves that is a proven fact.

Adaptations and mutations are not evolution or prove there of. Evolution is not a fact.
7

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #96 on: March 10, 2015, 06:21:35 PM »
Beaks of finches, butterflies, polar bears, etc. life adapts and evolves that is a proven fact.

So the finches remained finches, and Natural Selection REDUCED the total genetic information available. That, DEVOLUTION, is your best proof of evolution? Talk about being brainless. LMFAO.

SF1900

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 48848
  • Team Hairy Chest Henda
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #97 on: March 10, 2015, 06:22:37 PM »
The atheist silence is most instructive. They have no response to the scientific facts because of the myriad reasons atheism and evolution don't work, the relatively compact history of the universe being one of the most difficult to work around.

Today's Creation Moment
Are Rocks Like Vaults or Sponges?
1 Corinthians 2:7 "But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory:"
One of the common methods of finding the age of rocks, and ultimately the age of the Earth, measures the decay of radioactive uranium into lead – the more lead, the older the rock. The method, however, makes some very big assumptions. First, scientists assume there was no lead in the rock when it first formed, but this is unprovable. Then, they assume that rocks are like locked vaults and that no uranium, lead, or the in between decay elements can ever enter or leave the rock.
The fact is, numerous scientific studies show all these assumptions are wrong. Studies have shown that commonly dated rock material can have lead in it as it crystallizes. Other studies have shown that lead, uranium and the other elements important for dating can be removed from the rock by simple weathering or other conditions. In other words, while evolutionary scientists compare rocks to locked vaults, we are learning they are more like sponges. This explains why evolutionary dating methods have found, for example, one part of a rock to be 30 times older than another part of the same rock.
The next time you hear someone say that certain rocks or the fossils in them are millions or billions of years old, just remember that rocks are not like vaults. They are more like sponges that gain or lose elements, making accurate dating impossible. There is no good scientific evidence that the Earth is any older than the few thousand years indicated by the Bible.
Prayer:
I thank You, Lord, that I can trust You as the Rock of Ages. Amen.

Why 2 steaks?

X

Ron Harrigan

  • Guest
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #98 on: March 10, 2015, 06:30:01 PM »
Why 2 steaks?



Why you are so fearful of the reality of Biblical creation, only you can know. But it's really simple. Some of us have a lot of trouble believing stuff on the basis of authority, in the absence of evidence, and particularly when beliefs are contradicted by evidence. That's what atheists like you insist on believing by the way.

Voice of Doom

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3632
  • Everything is under control.
Re: Nobel Prize Winner Debunks Atheism!
« Reply #99 on: March 10, 2015, 06:32:19 PM »
So which "god" do these 44 Nobel Prize Winners believe is correct?  The Judeo-Christian one?  The Greco-Roman gods?  Hindu gods?  Norse Gods?

I mean if you're going to say the only obvious answer is a god...which one is it and what's the evidence to support that selection?