That analogy doesn’t really hold. BNB isn’t just a “stock” — it’s the native token of a full smart-contract blockchain (BSC), with ~$14B in stablecoins and major DEXs like Aster and PancakeSwap. It has real on-chain utility, unlike Nvidia shares.
https://www.cointribune.com/en/binance-boosts-aster-whales-quietly-accumulate/
https://www.coinspeaker.com/aster-price-prediction-binance-founder-announces-1-billion-ecosystem-fund/
https://defillama.com/stablecoins/chains
Binance is the largest exchange in the world. BNB holders get trading fee discounts, it can be staked, and tokens are regularly burned. With roughly 7 BNB for every 1 BTC in existence, it’s actually more scarce than the current BNB:BTC price ratio suggests.
I think you are again (deliberately?) confusing concepts.
In my view, BNB really is akin to a company which has issued shares as an unregistered security. Maybe, in crypto-speak, a better term would be a "utility token". Either way, the point here is that it makes money, through trading revenues derived from the exchanges it operates, is used to pay transaction fees and access services within the Binance ecosystem etc. With Coinbase, you have listed shares trading on the stock market. With Binance, you have their token. In both cases, value accumulated to the share based on performance of the underlying business. Which is when assessing the value of either, you need to look at traditional financial metrics - revenue, growth, debt, profit, profit margin, etc. Coinbase could pay out, (or retain) any profit. With BNB, they simply retain the profit which is then reflected in the value of the token. As for "burning", this is akin to a reverse stock split or a buy-back. So, BNB can burn tokens. And Coinbase can buy back stock. Mathematically its the same concept. Which is why I explained, just because BNB trades as a "token" it makes no sense to treat it as Bitcoin. Of course you can compare relative performance, but it's like comparing the performance of Gold to McDonalds. Does not mean either are good of bad investments per se, but they are definitely not both metals, nor are they both fast food restautrants.