rare 9/11 footage, how was this unseen for so long?

[Dave D]

ur post has been reported to a third party. u just had to push it didn't u... you just.. had to keep asking questions...

The same government that tried to publicly sue Apple to open an iphone, had to pay some hackers eventually, is smart enough to rig explosives, shoot missles across public skies in broad daylight and not a single soul has stepped forward to claim involvement....Interesti ng.

LOL's.

All this said it's still very suspicious that the buildings collapsed directly upon their selves, as most building/stadium  demolitions are strategic with explosive placement so that the structure collapses accordingly.

Although it wasn't like the buildings had anywhere else to fall other than straight down.

Side note I'm still working on the Pentagon stuff, be patient.

[Slik]

Let's hear about this third building. I don't know about this

[calfzilla]

Let's hear about this third building. I don't know about this

Not hit by anything but fell anyway 

[240 is Back]

“I was down there, and I watch our police and our firemen down on 7-Eleven, down at the World Trade Center, right after it came down and I saw the greatest people I have ever seen in action.”

- Trump, today.

[chaos]

And that third, much smaller building (part of the World Trade Centre buildings) toppling a few hours later ... when it wasn't even hit.

Yeah, nothing fishy.

Those towers came down like carefully engineered demos, as said. My father is a retired architect and knows a thing or two about these things. He immediately was like, What the fuck is THAT shit?!

So you think that someone in the US gov had those buildings wired with explosives?

[Pray_4_War]

It very surreal to me that people still won't accept what happened.  Nor will they accept the bigger picture fight that Islam has with the Western World.

Even Politicians in the USA don't get the gravity of the situation.

[Thespritz0]

And that third, much smaller building (part of the World Trade Centre buildings) toppling a few hours later ... when it wasn't even hit.

Yeah, nothing fishy.

Those towers came down like carefully engineered demos, as said. My father is a retired architect and knows a thing or two about these things. He immediately was like, What the fuck is THAT shit?!

^^
The biggest question of 9/11 WAS the building 7 issue, and MYSTERIOUSLY it "had" to fall like the world trade towers!!
Number 2, was the Pentagon...

[Ropo]

Was it a controlled demolition?  Missles disguised as airplanes?  How come all Jews that worked in the WTC happened to not be there that day?

1. No it was not
2. No, just airplanes
3. Complete bullshit

Do you really want start this all over again? Let me lay down the facts of the matter for you?

You foil hat morons seem to have some insurmountable difficulties to prove any of your claims about the 9/11 attack, so here you have some details what we know to be facts:

1. there is not even single explosion at the 9/11 video material, therefore it cannot be controlled demolition
2. towers fall down by "controlled demolition", but "explosions" which "pulverize concrete", didn't have enough power to break any windows
3. thermite is for welding railroads, not for demolition of the buildings, because it works only to the direction of the gravity
4. WTC 7 collapsed because parts of the WTC 1 hit in it on the way down
5. Pentagon was hit by the airplane because there isn't any missiles which can fly horizontally and carry 15 000 tons of jet fuel.
6. Even if you can't get past by of the amazement why flight 93 wasn't standing nose down in the dirt after the crash, it is a proven fact that around that miraculous dent in the dirt were debris field square mile large

These are so called undeniable facts of the matter, along with the fact that there isn't nobody on this planet who can prove any of them to be false. Do you understand? And if these are the facts, which foil hat can't prove to be false, all discussion about the things around these matters are futile nonsense of the complete idiots. If it isn't a controlled demolition, it was a terrorist attack just as official investigation proved years ago.

[Kim Jong Bob]

Did you know that the architects designed the towers to withstand a plane hit due to their height?

to withstand the biggest plane that existed  qt the time yes,  but the planes thqt hit the buildings where much larger

[Ropo]

15 years later I still don't understand how the towers collapsed. 

And all what this mean is the fact, that you have difficulties to comprehend reality because of your low IQ. Sorry to say, but it is true, and quite ordinary. It doesn't make you bad person at any way, you are just like one of the millions who have similar difficulties. That is called of being the average person

[Ropo]

Rare footage?    That's been on Youtube for years and years.

You have to understand that anything what foil hats see first time is called "rare footage" even if it has being around for decades for the normal people. Their biggest problem is that they are fishing their things from the foil hat pool of shit, and that doesn't include any of the facts which has being a common knowledge for years

[Ropo]

This!!!

You have your things in wrong order, sir. First you have to prove there were melted steel, then you have to prove that jet fuel can't melt it. Foil hats can't do either of these, so shut the fuck up. There wasn't melted steel at all, and all the claims which say so, are just lies or misunderstandings.

[Ropo]

As a veteran, my #1 question is WHY WHY WHY won't they release all the video around the Pentagon and the supposed "Airplane" which crashed into it??
WHY did they find NO plane parts in the Pentagon??
*** Could it be it was a Hellfire Missile?   

As a veteran, did they shot you in to head because you seem to be quite dumb, and that could be a way to explain it? You believe everything you read from the internet? No?? So why in the name of hell you believe when some foil hat moron tells you, that there were thousands of cameras filming Pentagon? This claim is partly true, there is thousands of security cams at the area of the Pentagon, but most of them has nothing to do with the Pentagons security. Why? Because in the outside of the building was just few cameras, filming mainly doorways etc. Those other "thousands of cameras" were in the near by businesses, like gas station, shop, hotel etc. and filming fuel pumps, cashier etc. If you can think, try to think for the reason why near by shop would be filming at the wall of Pentagon rather than it's own business?

[Ropo]

Here you go

You can clearly see the "plane" right

pretty impressive flying for someone with virtually zero training to come in so low like that and of course somehow make a hole that looks nothing like a plane

Yes, according the pilots for 911 truth, it is quite impossible to do so...which makes you wonder how in the name of god these pilots has being able to landing any aeroplane, because that needs quite a lot more accuracy. Instead of hitting 450 meters wide building, you have to hit to the end of runway only 20 meters wide 

What you see in that video, is a flash of burning jet fuel, and by that you can calculate how much of it is needed to make fireball as big as that. Quite simple, because you know what fuel/air mixture would flash, you know the height of the building etc. facts. Of course there is no way to get the exact measure, but all that makes possible to do quite accurate approximation: something between 12 000 and 16 000 metric tons. Just ask from yourself what kind of missile would carry that amount of  fuel?

[Ropo]

^^
That was NO PLANE, sorry looks exactly like a typical missile spewing white exhaust...

Exactly what missile? Name one, there is a list in Wikipedia which has all of the missiles of the USA with the dimensions. Your typical missile which is able to flight horizontally, would be the "cruise missile", and dear moron, those are just about 5 meters long. I understand that you would be able to mix 5 meters long and 0.5 ton needle to the 48.5 meter long and 100 ton aeroplane, but do you really think that any sane person would do same mistake? Because fact is that you have to be completely insane if you can't tell the difference between those two? And by the way, all the photos of the Pentagon attack proves that there wasn't any kind of explosion, because any of the debris didn't fly to outside from the building. There was only aluminum pieces and typical parts of aeroplane, but not even one brick or window frame? Isn't that weird if the missile has exploded inside of he building?

[jr]

[Ropo]

I don't claim to know the deal, but irrefutably something smells funny about the whole thing. Very funny.

If something smells there, it has to be those foil hat morons who crap in their pants from anger, because they have using decades of time and being able to prove 0 of their claims. Can you understand that? From 2001 to present time = billions of insane claims, and zero prove about any of them. All this because these people are the stupidest part of the human kind, who doesn't know even the simplest laws of physics. These people are able to explode tons of high energy explosives in the glass house without breaking the windows, and this single thing proves them to be just an idiots, drooling on their shoes.  

[Ropo]

What a joke. You're serious?

Well, that is literally what happened, only thing which is proved, so how it is joke? Because you don't believe it? That puts you in the 15% of the people, and in the average nation of this planet, there is 20-25% of those, who are needing of the mental care in some point in their life. Just do your math..Stupidest of the morons etc..you find yourself in that bunch 

[Ropo]

Did you know that the architects designed the towers to withstand a plane hit due to their height?

Did you know that in the 70ties they didn't fly with the planes of the year 2001? They designed towers to withstand a hit by average plane from the 70ties, and just how much things has changed during 30 years? And their calculations was based on the theory that plane hit the tower by accident, not by suicide mission, where you are charging with the full throttle. Can you understand the difference?

[Ropo]

And that third, much smaller building (part of the World Trade Centre buildings) toppling a few hours later ... when it wasn't even hit.

Yeah, nothing fishy.

Those towers came down like carefully engineered demos, as said. My father is a retired architect and knows a thing or two about these things. He immediately was like, What the fuck is THAT shit?!

Wasn't even hit? Well, not by the aeroplane, that is true. But when 400 meters tall skyscraper falls on to facade of the 200 meter tall building, some of us would call that a "hit", and this is what has proved to be a fact. Parts of the WTC 1 hit to WTC 7 and make serious structural damages. Building was on fire straight 8 hours after that, and collapse. What miraculous is in that? And where you would see how these 400 meters tall skyscrapers would fall in real life? Nowhere, so all your thinking about that has to be based on imagination, and that doesn't prove anything.

[Mr Anabolic]

This Ropo character is a funny guy.  He actually believes the official US government story/explanation of 9/11.  Sounds/acts just like a government anti-conspiracy shill.

[Costanza]

big ropo annihilating in this thread

[Mr Anabolic]

big ropo annihilating in this thread

Really?  He makes a lot of assumptions.  There are many, many holes in the official 9/11 story.

[Kim Jong Bob]

Quite funny see ropo destroy the tinfoilhats in this thread

[Ropo]

This Ropo character is a funny guy.  He actually believes the official US government story/explanation of 9/11.  Sounds/acts just like a government anti-conspiracy shill.

No, but I believe that morons like you are insanely eager to believe the crap which doesn't include any evidence what so ever..For example, you haven't being able to prove any of your claims. Why don't you start from that instead of that whining?