Hey Straw and Gun Control people - what is your plan for this?

[iwantmass]

so you're saying it's possible for me to expect a mass shooting event to happen in this country (as I've previously defined in this thread as 4 or more people being shot or killed) sometime in the next day or two somewhere in this country

Yes, i expect a person like you expects to see something happen in a country of 320 million.  As i said earlier, I expect a star to die tonight somewhere in infinite space.  Neither of those scenarios makes you less of an idiot or mass shootings less of an anomaly

What a fucking idiot...but i will keep going because i'm smarter, i type faster, i make more valid points etc.  I will gladly let you continue to be a liar and an idiot

[iwantmass]

It would be unexpected for you to win this argument.  It would be expected for you to lie.  It would be unexpected that anyone reading your nonsense agrees with you. I can play with the definition of a word too

[Straw Man]

Yes, i expect a person like you expects to see something happen in a country of 320 million.  As i said earlier, I expect a star to die tonight somewhere in infinite space.  Neither of those scenarios makes you less of an idiot or mass shootings less of an anomaly

What a fucking idiot...but i will keep going because i'm smarter, i type faster, i make more valid points etc.  I will gladly let you continue to be a liar and an idiot

I thought we already agreed on the definition of an anomaly

are you changing your mind on that?

If not, then is it possible for me to expect a mass shooting event to happen in this country sometime in the next day or two ?

[iwantmass]

I thought we already agreed on the definition of an anomaly

are you changing your mind on that?

If not, then is it possible for me to expect a mass shooting event to happen in this country sometime in the next day or two ?

I've never had any doubts of the definition. Its why I called mass shootings anomalies, because they satisfy the definition.  We don't agree with your desperate attempts at bending the definition to satisfy your argument.  You can expect anything you want.  None of the participants of those events will expect it, nor will the venue itself expect it, nor will it change the fact that these things can't even happen once per day in a population of 320 million.  Funny how you don't link your chart during the period of the 3 day absence in mass shootings....It almost seems like you are a liar

Should we talk about mass murders in the continent of europe and how that in no way supports your argument now?

[Straw Man]

I've never had any doubts of the definition. Its why I called mass shootings anomalies, because they satisfy the definition.  We don't agree with your desperate attempts at bending the definition to satisfy your argument.  You can expect anything you want.  None of the participants of those events will expect it, nor will the venue itself expect it, nor will it change the fact that these things can't even happen once per day in a population of 320 million.  Funny how you don't link your chart during the period of the 3 day absence in mass shootings....It almost seems like you are a liar

Should we talk about mass murders in the continent of europe and how that in no way supports your argument now?

the agreed upon definition says they are "unusual or unexpected"

is it possible for me to expect something to happen that you or some other person does not expect to happen?

[iwantmass]

the agreed upon definition says they are "unusual or unexpected"

is it possible for me to expect something to happen that you or some other person does not expect to happen?

It is unusual/unexpected for a mass shooting to happen at a gay nightclub. You didn't expect the Orlando night club shooting, nor did anyone else.  The only thing you claim to expect is to see some variety of mass shooting on the national news. That holds no relationship to the actual event.  Have you always suffered these comprehension issues and bouts of inferiority?

[Straw Man]

It is unusual/unexpected for a mass shooting to happen at a gay nightclub. You didn't expect the Orlando night club shooting, nor did anyone else.  The only thing you claim to expect is to see some variety of mass shooting on the national news. That holds no relationship to the actual event.  Have you always suffered these comprehension issues and bouts of inferiority?

is it possible for me to expect something to happen that you or some other person does not expect to happen?

yes or no ?

[iwantmass]

is it possible for me to expect something to happen that you or some other person does not expect to happen?

yes or no ?

]

Is autism an anomaly, yes or no? Answer the question.  Or is every doctor and medical published literature wrong?

I've already won the argument 10 times over. I don't have any need for you to dictate it in your stupid direction

[Straw Man]

]

Is autism an anomaly, yes or no? Answer the question.  Or is every doctor and medical published literature wrong?

I've already won the argument 10 times over. I don't have any need for you to dictate it in your stupid direction

obviously it would depend on someone's expectation

if a parent expects they might have an autistic child (for example perhaps it runs in their family) then it's not an anomaly

then again, there are multiple definitions of the word

we've been using the "simple" definition in deference to you simple mind

let's go back to your link

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anomaly

[iwantmass]

obviously it would depend on someone's expectation

if a parent expects they might have an autistic child (for example perhaps it runs in their family) then it's not an anomaly

then again, there are multiple definitions of the word

we've been using the "simple" definition in deference to you simple mind

let's go back to your link

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anomaly

You are too big of a liar to even answer a simple yes or no question.  You don't get to rely on the definition, yet not agree with the example it provides.  Additionally, you have proven yourself to be one of the stupidest people on this board via this argument.  Then again, you already knew how stupid you are, its the reason you argue on this board and not in real life.  The entire medical community agrees autism is an anomaly.  It isn't open for debate among people educated in the field of medical science.

You have zero argument and are literally arguing like a child that says "But why" over and over.  

Go back to my link and look at the example they provided.  You don't get to cherry pick the words based on your needs.

This line of argument has lost you any small amount of credibility you did have on this board.

Additionally, why are you providing a left leaning gun control advocacy site for your reference of mass shootings?  It doesn't agree with the fbi database or many other definitions of mass shootings

[Straw Man]

You are too big of a liar to even answer a simple yes or no question.  You don't get to rely on the definition, yet not agree with the example it provides.  Additionally, you have proven yourself to be one of the stupidest people on this board via this argument.  Then again, you already knew how stupid you are, its the reason you argue on this board and not in real life.  The entire medical community agrees autism is an anomaly.  It isn't open for debate among people educated in the field of medical science.

You have zero argument and are literally arguing like a child that says "But why" over and over. 

Go back to my link and look at the example they provided.  You don't get to cherry pick the words based on your needs.

This line of argument has lost you any small amount of credibility you did have on this board.

I answered your question and even explained the answer based on the definition you posted

what part didn't you understand

[iwantmass]

I answered your question and even explained the answer based on the definition you posted

what part didn't you understand

There is nothing that you could write on here that I wouldn't understand.  You are the fucking idiot that doesn't even understand his own screen name and have attempted a strawman argument no less than 3 times in this very thread

If you showed this thread to anyone you knew in real life and didn't reveal your identity, they would ask who this strawman retard is

[Soul Crusher]

I answered your question and even explained the answer based on the definition you posted

what part didn't you understand

You are getting tossed around like a rag doll on this thread

[Straw Man]

There is nothing that you could write on here that I wouldn't understand.  You are the fucking idiot that doesn't even understand his own screen name and have attempted a strawman argument no less than 3 times in this very thread

If you showed this thread to anyone you knew in real life and didn't reveal your identity, they would ask who this strawman retard is

You seem to not understand the definition whose link you provided

It's only 8 words long so kind of hard not to understand

I expect another mass shooting event to happen in this country in the next few days so by the definition you provided that is not an anomaly to me

what part of the definition did I violate with that statement

[Straw Man]

You are getting tossed around like a rag doll on this thread

perfectly happy for you to jump in here

do you expect another mass shooting to happen in this country sometime soon or will you be "absolutely shocked" when it happens again

[iwantmass]

You seem to not understand the definition whose link you provided

It's only 8 words long so kind of hard not to understand

I expect another mass shooting even to happen in this country in the next few days so by the definition you provided that is not an anomaly to me

what part of the definition did I violate with that statement

i understand it just fine and i also understand the example it gave, that you choose to ignore. Stop attempting to associate me with your incompetency.  You are a desperate person trying to tear a definition down to its nuts and bolts because you have had the shit kicked out of you in an online debate.  That being said, as i've reiterated, you won't get the luxury of the last word.  

You violated the comprehension of the definition.  

I know you are stupid, so you don't have to "play" stupid for the internet. I also have plenty of free time, so i won't tire of this.

You are an idiot.  Tell us why you can't identify a strawman argument.

Tell us why you've attempted and lost at least 3 strawman arguments in this thread

Tell us why you have no merit for your liberal argument so you unsuccessfully attempt to refute the definition of a word

tell us why you provided a gun control advocacy website for your mass shooting links, that completely contradicts the fbi and most database definitions of mass shootings

[Straw Man]

i understand it just fine and i also understand the example it gave, that you choose to ignore. Stop attempting to associate me with your incompetency.  You are a desperate person trying to tear a definition down to its nuts and bolts because you have had the shit kicked out of you in an online debate.  That being said, as i've reiterated, you won't get the luxury of the last word.  

You violated the comprehension of the definition.  

I know you are stupid, so you don't have to "play" stupid for the internet. I also have plenty of free time, so i won't tire of this.

You are an idiot.  Tell us why you can't identify a strawman argument.

Tell us why you've attempted and lost at least 3 strawman arguments in this thread

Tell us why you have no merit for your liberal argument so you unsuccessfully attempt to refute the definition of a word

what did I choose to ignore

autism?

btw - please point out the straw man arguments

[iwantmass]

what did I choose to ignore

autism?

btw - please point out the straw man arguments

yes thats what you chose to ignore.

your funny cow argument, your europe mass killing argument, and this definition argument.  none of them pertain to the merit of your initial argument. they are all sad attempts to cover your initial failed argument

i hope you have the excuse of being drunk, otherwise this is pathetic

i understand  you are immature and have nothing worthwhile in your life, but i don't go back to work friday and will happily continue to make you look like the idiot that you are. 

[Straw Man]

yes thats what you chose to ignore.

your funny cow argument, your europe mass killing argument, and this definition argument.  none of them pertain to the merit of your initial argument. they are all sad attempts to cover your initial failed argument

i hope you have the excuse of being drunk, otherwise this is pathetic

did I not explain they autism may or may not be an anomaly based on ones expectation

is that one one of the defintions

I asked you if you wanted to apply one of the other defintions and if you do then tell me which one you want to use from the Full Definition that I provided from your link

Explain how the two headed cow etc.. are  Straw Man arguments

I assume you're saying the two headed cow is not an anomaly, same terrorist attacks in Europe

[iwantmass]

did I not explain they autism may or may not be an anomaly based on ones expectation

is that one one of the defintions

I asked you if you wanted to apply one of the other defintions and if you do then tell me which one you want to use from the Full Definition that I provided from your link

Explain how the two headed cow etc.. are  Straw Man arguments

I assume you're saying the two headed cow is not an anomaly, same terrorist attacks in Europe

i have no desire to explain to you what your screen name means.  You shouldn't have tried to look intelligent to others by choosing that name.  Had you just chose a more appropriate name like 90iq, you would have more honestly represented yourself and not had an expectation that you felt the need to look up to.  If it matters, no one respects you or thinks you are intelligent anyhow

You should message the mods for a name change.  This is the 2nd time you've proven not to know what your name means

No idiot, I'm not saying they aren't anomalies.  The idea that you think that is what would make them strawman arguments is the very reason i say you don't understand strawman arguments

why do you continue to ignore my mention of the questionable website that you choose to get your mass shooting data? Y

[Straw Man]

i have no desire to explain to you what your screen name means.  You shouldn't have tried to look intelligent to others by choosing that name.  Had you just chose a more appropriate name like 90iq, you would have more honestly represented yourself and not had an expectation that you felt the need to look up to.  If it matters, no one respects you or thinks you are intelligent anyhow

You should message the mods for a name change.  This is the 2nd time you've proven not to know what your name means

No idiot, I'm not saying they aren't anomalies.  The idea that you think that is what would make them strawman arguments is the very reason i say you don't understand strawman arguments

why do you continue to ignore my mention of the questionable website that you choose to get your mass shooting data? Y

LOL - so now you're basically saying you can't actually diagram my alleged Straw Man argument

have you noticed the majority of the content in your posts are insults to me and compliments to yourself

self compliments are an interesting debate tactic

if you think the mass shooting info is fraudulent please let me know which ones are false

Do you want to get back to the anomaly topic

Lets start with an easy question

Is there only one definition of an anomaly ?

I thought we agreed on the one we were using but let me know if you want to change it

[iwantmass]

LOL - so now you're basically saying you can't actually diagram my alleged Straw Man argument

have you noticed the majority of the content in your posts are insults to me and compliments to yourself

self compliments are an interesting debate tactic

if you think the mass shooting info is fraudulent please let me know which ones are false

Do you want to get back to the anomaly topic

Lets start with an easy question

Is there only one definition of an anomaly ?

I thought we agreed on the one we were using but let me know if you want to change it

Self compliment isn't the debate tactic. It's what you do when you've won the debate, which I did 4 pages ago

I can absolutely diagram a strawman argument as I'm the one that identified em.  You on the otherhand don't understand what 1 is or how to identify it.  I won't be going the same road with the definition a strawman argument that we have been with anomaly.  It's not my job to educate you. As I stated earlier, blame your parents and their shitty genetics on your poor comprehension

Insulting you in no way takes away from the substance/validity of my argument, just as you not doing so changes the fact that you've changed the course of your weak argument multiple times.  I can be right and insult you. The 2 don't exclude each other.  

You can keep pathetically debating the definition of the word anomaly.  No overwhelming amount of evidence would make you admit to your stupidity.  I don't expect otherwise.  People like you always lose and always do just what you are doing now.  People like me that most often times win, are okay admitting the rare exception we are wrong. This time would not be close to one of them.

I'm okay arguing with an idiot that openly admits he will disagree with the entire medical community.  8t just makes you look stupider

Once again, change your screen name

[Straw Man]

Self compliment isn't the debate tactic. It's what you do when you've won the debate, which I did 4 pages ago

I can absolutely diagram a strawman argument as I'm the one that identified em.  You on the otherhand don't understand what 1 is or how to identify it.  I won't be going the same road with the definition a strawman argument that we have been with anomaly.  It's not my job to educate you. As I stated earlier, blame your parents and their shitty genetics on your poor comprehension

Insulting you in no way takes away from the substance/validity of my argument, just as you not doing so changes the fact that you've changed the course of your weak argument multiple times.  I can be right and insult you. The 2 don't exclude each other.  

You can keep pathetically debating the definition of the word anomaly.  No overwhelming amount of evidence would make you admit to your stupidity.  I don't expect otherwise.  People like you always lose and always do just what you are doing now.  People like me that most often times win, are okay admitting the rare exception we are wrong. This time would not be close to one of them.

I'm okay arguing with an idiot that openly admits he will disagree with the entire medical community.  8t just makes you look stupider

Once again, change your screen name

great

lets see it

it pretty obvious you haven't got a clue what it means

same goes for the definition of an anomaly

you seem to have no clue what that means in spite of the fact we've agreed on a very simple and singular definition of that word

[iwantmass]

great

lets see it

it pretty obvious you haven't got a clue what it means

same goes for the definition of an anomaly

you seem to have no clue what that means in spite of the fact we've agreed on a very simple and singular definition of that word

That is the stance I would take too if I named myself for an argument strategy that I didn't understand.  Pseudo intellectual strawman and his faux iq crumbling in this thread.  At least we don't have to find the last thread that you proved not to be able to identify a strawman argument.  You've proven it multiple times here.

You don't get to say I don't understand a word just because you choose to be stubborn.  This is what happens when you choose to represent a typical liberal talking point as your own original point of view on an open forum.  People a lot smarter than you will tear it apart and call you out on your bullshit. Then again, you are the gutless coward that is too afraid to present your real argument because this very thread would happen to you more often

[Straw Man]

That is the stance I would take too if I named myself for an argument strategy that I didn't understand.  Pseudo intellectual strawman and his faux iq crumbling in this thread.  At least we don't have to find the last thread that you proved not to be able to identify a strawman argument.  You've proven it multiple times here.

You don't get to say I don't understand a word just because you choose to be stubborn.  This is what happens when you choose to represent a typical liberal talking point as your own original point of view on an open forum.  People a lot smarter than you will tear it apart and call you out on your bullshit. Then again, you are the gutless coward that is too afraid to present your real argument because this very thread would happen to you more often

I'm totally fine if you want to discuss my alleged Straw Man arguments

any time you want to demonstrate you know what that means please do so