Kavanaugh's accuser from 38 years ago goes public

[Kwon3]

I’m making a observation based on how his posts have been & what he’s saying,
As stated I’ve held Agnostic in high regard even though we’ve frequently disagreed.
He’s gone very left wing liberal & lost his reasoned middle ground outlook of Before.

And let’s be honest policing has an awful lot of very questionable individuals in its
Ranks And seriously needs a thorough house clean.
Though that’s for a different thread.

Personally, I think you've been taking it way too easy on him. He's one of those guys that if you back off for even an hour, he starts with his nonsense again and recycles the same talking points that were already discussed a month earlier. I know who's reasonable on here with strong opinions and who's plainly irrational and confrontational on every point raised, and he's definitely not the former. I don't insult his occupation because I respect his occupation, and while I've seen no proof that he worked in law enforcement, chaos vouches for him and I trust chaos's judgment.

That being said, I liked these types of replies a lot more. They were effective at ending that ridiculous back-and-forth in ND's thread. I'd like to see more of them used with A007. Guarantee he wouldn't stick around for long. 

Back again
Peadophile Pervert.

In bold letters so your stupid thick brain can take it in.
FUCK OFF.
I’M NOT & NEITHER IS ANYONE ELSE AFRAID OF YOU
AND YOUR PATHETIC THREATS.
WE’RE NOT GOING TO MEET - LUCKILY FOR YOU - SO GET OVER IT.

FUCK OFF BACK TO WHATEVER PAEDO / PERVERT INTERNET SITE
YOU USUALLY FREQUENT - AND BE THE PATHETIC BRAGGART WEAKLING ON THERE.

Just how many quotes of a very questionable nature is there on this board.

Peadophile Pervert.
Dismissed.

[illuminati]

Personally, I think you've been taking it way too easy on him. He's one of those guys that if you back off for even an hour, he starts with his nonsense again and recycles the same talking points that were already discussed a month earlier. I know who's reasonable on here with strong opinions and who's plainly irrational and confrontational on every point raised, and he's definitely not the former. I don't insult his occupation because I respect his occupation, and while I've seen no proof that he worked in law enforcement, chaos vouches for him and I trust chaos's judgment.

That being said, I liked these types of replies a lot more. They were effective at ending that ridiculous back-and-forth in ND's thread. I'd like to see more of them used with A007. Guarantee he wouldn't stick around for long. 

Ha ha - Thanks for your advice & support.

As I’ve said before - Please be careful with referencing you know how
As he may easily take umbrage with you and Threaten all sorts of
Untold horrors & beatings also Demand you post pictures of yourself 
Lest this thread be ravaged by him.

 

[Agnostic007]

Guys. I'm right here.. I can hear you..

[Agnostic007]

And it’s okay with you
As you’re always quick to defend them and point out any little subtleties
That may protect / help clear them.
We don’t see you on you’re high horse condemning them.

Double standards or what.

Depends on what you consider a double standard. If by double standard you mean that I may point out things from my point of view that you may not have considered then absolutely. If you mean by double standard that I don't always agree with your opinion on a police matter then yes.. I guess it all depends on what you want to call a double standard. As for condemning them.. all you have to do is visit the thread that talks about the officer that shot the teen with a knife, where I said I watched the video and the shooting wasn't justified to see that I do try and call a duck a duck. Am I biased towards police, absolutely. I am pro police. But unless you are suffering from selective memory, you should recall times when I condemned them.

[illuminati]

Depends on what you consider a double standard. If by double standard you mean that I may point out things from my point of view that you may not have considered then absolutely. If you mean by double standard that I don't always agree with your opinion on a police matter then yes.. I guess it all depends on what you want to call a double standard. As for condemning them.. all you have to do is visit the thread that talks about the officer that shot the teen with a knife, where I said I watched the video and the shooting wasn't justified to see that I do try and call a duck a duck. Am I biased towards police, absolutely. I am pro police. But unless you are suffering from selective memory, you should recall times when I condemned them.

Ahhh - Now That’s more like the agnostic I know and cross verbal swords with.
Likewise I / we point out things you may not of considered
We very seldom agree on police matters
And that’s a very rare occasion you’ve condemned a cop. 
I call a scumbag a scumbag cop or otherwise
I’m neither pro or anti cops.

[Primemuscle]

Exactly - You don’t say there not the same  Really
She & The Democraps did the senate route
1, because the burden of proof upon her was no existent
2, to derail & stop him getting elected

Of Course she never had any intention of going with criminal charges
She would’ve opened herself up to all sorts of potential problems.

Piece of crap she is & her idiot supporters.

I'm sorry, was there some other route suitable and timely? I didn't know.

[Primemuscle]

Only on Getbig do the idiots keep rehashing what is over and done with. Kavanaugh was confirmed. He's a Supreme Court Justice. Y'all can whine and moan about what got him there all you want. but you're merely spinning your wheels at this point. Next...

[illuminati]

I'm sorry, was there some other route suitable and timely? I didn't know.

In the intervening 34/36/38yrs whichever you choose
Yes there was an other route & Likely more than 1.

[Yamcha]

Yes, if I did it and she came around 38 years later to accuse me, I would certainly admit it. I am vying for a seat on the Supreme court. I am a federal judge. I certainly believe I could survive telling the truth. Anyone can tell the truth when there is no cost. Integrity and character come into play when it will cost and you still do it.

I don't think your accuser would be a female. tbh

[illuminati]

Exactly!

1. The republicans had more senators to confirm him, so he got in.
2. They'll be some inevitable political backlash during next months election.

Pretty simple.

True they did.
And it’s just as well they did after the atrocious behaviour of many against him
Purely because he’s a conservative- Nothing else 
Until that wasn’t going to work so they drum up Dr Ford & Her amazingly accurate
Memory- Who in Fact can’t remember Fcuk All - Except it Was Him....
Yeah Right - Those like you bought it hook line & sinker.

[Kwon3]

I don't think your accuser would be a female. tbh

He strikes me as the type of husband who sweet talks his wife, pushes the shopping cart, makes her breakfast in bed, and gets her to agree to let him have sex with other men as long as he keeps it out of her bedroom. So yeah, I agree with you.

[Kwon3]

What about using the strap on?

As sissy and wet as your political views are, I don't see you resorting to sex with other men. You just don't seem to be the type, as most bisexual guys don't marry multiple times (1 is usually enough to disillusion them off women for good). Agnostic is a lot more...open minded, shall we say. Then again I could be wrong about him, too.

[illuminati]

As sissy and wet as your political views are, I don't see you resorting to sex with other men. You just don't seem to be the type, as most bisexual guys don't marry multiple times (1 is usually enough to disillusion them off women for good). Agnostic is a lot more...open minded, shall we say. Then again I could be wrong about him, too.

I don’t see either of them as being queer or part queer.
Jeez Howard’s working his way through marrying all available milfs / cougars
I congratulate him on that.
Maybe he’s deep in the closet very deep in - With another woman 

[Kwon3]

You're a funny dude and that was pretty clever zinger.
We obviously don't agree on too many political issues.
But, WTF, that shouldn't trigger a string of insult filled retorts.

I'm nothing great and I lack the desire or talent to ever run for high office.
BUT, I'm not angry and feel good about my life overall.
On a serious note, I see a lot of  different people out there , who seem really angry and pissed off at life.

If your life sucks, don't blame a politician.
Get out there and get a new job, get divorced,remarried, new gf, bf, whatever. Just go do something to change things.
Yelling at GOP senators or wearing a MAGA hat while insulting liberals, won't change your life.
For some , it seems to be their life.

That's how the Left rationalizes everything: If you don't like your situation, improve it. Who cares about the world around you.

That is not what conservatism is all about. We don't have the luxury of turning a blind eye while our entire culture, our media, our political system, and our social fabric disintegrate due to a small group of misfits that want to change everything for everyone just because something offends them or doesn't seem fair to them. MeToo, the right for men to piss in female bathrooms as long as they identify as women, men marrying other men or joining the military while openly espousing views that bother a good number of our troops, and a ton of other things are all reasons why we're upset not just at "liberals" but at where our country is headed. This isn't my dad's America anymore and it's all because of you.

[Kwon3]

If Trump said take personal responsibility for your life, you'd wear it on a t shirt.

I could declare that Kwon3 is the ultimate ladies man, and you'd post a pic at  a pride parade in assless chaps.

The difference is Trump keeps his promises. That's why his supporters continue supporting him long after his novelty wore off. I can post a recent liberal MSNBC panel that acknowledged that he delivers and that's a big part of his appeal. The left rarely says what it thinks or thinks what it says, and almost never remembers the campaign promises it made during election years. That's where Trump is head and shoulders above the opposition. He also speaks candidly without a filter, something neither other republicans nor democrats have ever done, since their careers are more important than their truth.

[Agnostic007]

As sissy and wet as your political views are, I don't see you resorting to sex with other men. You just don't seem to be the type, as most bisexual guys don't marry multiple times (1 is usually enough to disillusion them off women for good). Agnostic is a lot more...open minded, shall we say. Then again I could be wrong about him, too.

Certainly wouldn't be a first

[Agnostic007]

The difference is Trump keeps his promises. That's why his supporters continue supporting him long after his novelty wore off. I can post a recent liberal MSNBC panel that acknowledged that he delivers and that's a big part of his appeal. The left rarely says what it thinks or thinks what it says, and almost never remembers the campaign promises it made during election years. That's where Trump is head and shoulders above the opposition. He also speaks candidly without a filter, something neither other republicans nor democrats have ever done, since their careers are more important than their truth.

And this is why you can't be taken seriously

[Kwon3]

And this is why you can't be taken seriously

Go take a read and come back when you're done.

(You won't)

https://www.promiseskept.com/

[Primemuscle]

Go take a read and come back when you're done.

(You won't)

https://www.promiseskept.com/

Chiming in....I read it. IMO the points are both overstated and premature. However, these are things Trump promised to do.

[IroNat]

A Conservative wants the country to stay just as f***ed up as it currently is.

A Liberal wants the country to be even more f***ed up.

[Kwon3]

A Conservative wants the country to stay just as f***ed up as it currently is.

A Liberal wants the country to be even more f***ed up.

I liked the country just fine until Bill Clinton. We could live in 1988 forever and I'd be truly content with that.

[illuminati]

Go take a read and come back when you're done.

(You won't)

https://www.promiseskept.com/

Go Donald
It’s Pathetic that Leftist would dislike someone so much
That is doing such a Good job.

The world Needs more leaders like Donald
And far less airy fairy spineless politically correct scared of their own shadows
Liberal Leftist contaminated with the feminisation.

[Primemuscle]

Go Donald
It’s Pathetic that Leftist would dislike someone so much
That is doing such a Good job.

The world Needs more leaders like Donald
And far less airy fairy spineless politically correct scared of their own shadows
Liberal Leftist contaminated with the feminisation.

You could also be describing any number of dictators both past and present.

[illuminati]

You could also be describing any number of dictators both past and present.

? 
Pathetic reply.
Is that the best you can muster.

[mazrim]

You could also be describing any number of dictators both past and present.

This doesn't even make sense. He said "leaders not "dictators". Why would he want more dictators? Is that what you want? When did the definition of "leader" get changed?