A scatterbrained pigeon.
Damn in a court of law??
From a scientific perspective, creationism is classified as a pseudoscience rather than a valid empirical explanation. Because it relies on supernatural explanations that cannot be tested, measured, or disproven by the scientific method, it does not meet the criteria of science.
Scientific View No Empirical Support: Scientific fields like biology, geology, and astronomy rely on evidence gathered through observation and experimentation.
Contradicted by Data: The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that the fossil record, genetics, and radiometric dating completely contradict a literal, young-earth creationist timeline.
Legal and Educational Rulings: Courts have formally ruled on the matter. For example, in the landmark legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, a federal court ruled that intelligent design (a form of creationism) is a religious view and not science
Given the fact pattern here it would appear that someone has a low IQ. Simplistic worldview, believing things that are patently false and supporting convicts while preaching integrity. I assume your superego has died because the dissonance would be hard for most people to swallow. I hope this hate is cathartic for you, another healing!