Screw You Dr. Fauci Thread!

[Necrosis]

A scatterbrained pigeon.

Damn in a court of law??

From a scientific perspective, creationism is classified as a pseudoscience rather than a valid empirical explanation. Because it relies on supernatural explanations that cannot be tested, measured, or disproven by the scientific method, it does not meet the criteria of science.

Scientific View No Empirical Support: Scientific fields like biology, geology, and astronomy rely on evidence gathered through observation and experimentation.

Contradicted by Data: The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that the fossil record, genetics, and radiometric dating completely contradict a literal, young-earth creationist timeline.

Legal and Educational Rulings: Courts have formally ruled on the matter. For example, in the landmark legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, a federal court ruled that intelligent design (a form of creationism) is a religious view and not science


Given the fact pattern here it would appear that someone has a low IQ. Simplistic worldview, believing things that are patently false and supporting convicts while preaching integrity. I assume your superego has died because the dissonance would be hard for most people to swallow. I hope this hate is cathartic for you, another healing!

[Necrosis]

Black and white, like the chess board the pigeon knocked all the pieces over and shit on while swearing he was the smartest winner ever.

Do me a favor? can you look up how chess is played because you can't win like that. I have pointed this out a few times but it's not connecting.

[Necrosis]

  skill and integrity.  Any honest person who functions in the real world can confirm this.  Integrity (and the trust that accompanies it) is the most valuable currency a person can have in business.  Like I mentioned, there is no on-and-off switch.  You have it, or you don't.     

   

 


Why Children Think This Way Brain growth: Young brains are still growing. They need simple rules to make sense of a big, confusing world.Lack of grey areas: Kids lack the mental tools to process complex, mixed situations. A person is either totally nice or totally mean.Normal stages: This type of thinking is a normal part of growing up. It usually starts to change into nuanced thinking during the teen years

Yes, complex thinking is a direct hallmark of developmental maturity. In developmental psychology and neuroscience, the transition from concrete thinking (processing only what is physically present) to complex thinking represents the brain moving into its final, most mature stages of growth.The Cognitive Shift to Complexity According to Jean Piaget’s stages of cognitive development, individuals enter the Formal Operational Stage around age 12, which extends into adulthood. This shift allows the brain to process information using several advanced frameworks: Abstract Thinking: The ability to conceptualize concepts that have no physical reality, such as justice, human rights, or systemic politics. Metacognition: The mature capacity to "think about thinking," enabling an individual to monitor, evaluate, and critique their own biases and thought processes.

Dialectical Thinking: A later stage of adult development where a person learns to synthesize opposing viewpoints, accepting that life is filled with contradictions and ambiguities rather than just black-and-white truths

You into Hegel?

[Dos Equis]

Damn in a court of law??

From a scientific perspective, creationism is classified as a pseudoscience rather than a valid empirical explanation. Because it relies on supernatural explanations that cannot be tested, measured, or disproven by the scientific method, it does not meet the criteria of science.

Scientific View No Empirical Support: Scientific fields like biology, geology, and astronomy rely on evidence gathered through observation and experimentation.

Contradicted by Data: The overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that the fossil record, genetics, and radiometric dating completely contradict a literal, young-earth creationist timeline.

Legal and Educational Rulings: Courts have formally ruled on the matter. For example, in the landmark legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, a federal court ruled that intelligent design (a form of creationism) is a religious view and not science


Given the fact pattern here it would appear that someone has a low IQ. Simplistic worldview, believing things that are patently false and supporting convicts while preaching integrity. I assume your superego has died because the dissonance would be hard for most people to swallow. I hope this hate is cathartic for you, another healing!

What in the world is our dishonest, daily pot smoking, autistic Canadian contributor talking about?  He (or she) seems to be confused. 

[Grape Ape]

Just to confirm though, not related to this post. You haven't read Nietzsche have you?

I haven't?  Who knows, because there are no facts, only interpretations—and mine is that I have read Nietzsche. Yours, apparently, is that I haven’t.

So, shall we move on as I suggested, or shall we test whose will to power is stronger?

Or would you prefer we just stare into the abyss together until one of us blinks?

[Necrosis]

I haven't?  Who knows, because there are no facts, only interpretations—and mine is that I have read Nietzsche. Yours, apparently, is that I haven’t.

So, shall we move on as I suggested, or shall we test whose will to power is stronger?

Or would you prefer we just stare into the abyss together until one of us blinks?

Misinterpretation of Nietzsche noted. Interpretations are what facts are and some a better than others, always open to new interpretations. He is building off of kierkegarrd. He is supporting a type of perspectivism, a very specific type. He is notoriously hard to interpret as he was against systemization and wrote in aphorisms a lot which doesn't lead to a clear hermeneutical treatment. He is ushering in a nascent paraconsistency. I can say you haven't read him but my idea of read him is all of him, while you may think reading some quotes is reading him, both are correct, both are "facts", both are "interpretations" but one is better than the other.

People don't have will to power, just fyi. It't a metaphysical principle.

If you have read him, kudos. He is worth it and difficult. Its definitely ergodic reading.

[Necrosis]

What in the world is our dishonest, daily pot smoking, autistic Canadian contributor talking about?  He (or she) seems to be confused.

multiple lies in one sentence.

You poor man. I will take it easier on you moving forward. I keep intending to but your takes are just so insane I can't help myself.