Author Topic: Random pics  (Read 3619730 times)

herne

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 153771
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114750 on: May 22, 2016, 02:02:21 PM »
.

herne

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 153771
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114751 on: May 22, 2016, 02:03:23 PM »
.

Gregzs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17372
  • Getbig!
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114752 on: May 22, 2016, 02:36:32 PM »
A top psychologist explains how birth order may affect your success

http://www.techinsider.io/adam-grant-birth-order-predicts-success-2016-2?utm_content=buffer4028e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-ti



There's got to be something about birth order and success — why else would it be a staple of conversation on first dates and in networking events?  — but science hasn't quite figured out what.

It's a "widely controversial" field, explains University of Pennsylvania psychologist Adam Grant, but a worthwhile one for evaluating.

In "Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World," Grant takes a dive into birth order research. He unearths two surprising findings: many of the top base stealers in Major League Baseball history were younger siblings. The same hold true with top comedians.

At the same time, studies indicate that first-born kids are more ambitious when it comes to advancing their education, score higher on IQ tests, and go further in business than their siblings.

Older (and only) siblings tend to be more conventionally successful, Grant says.

"They grow up in a world of adults who are generally smarter than children and they want to please adults, " he says. "And the way to do that is you succeed in conventional ways."

But a lot of these birth order discussions are speculative.

"It's really hard to test a lot of these mechanisms and the kind of careful research that needs to be done hasn't been done yet to really explain why," he says, "but I think there are a couple things that are likely to be going on."

That said, there are some compelling explanations for how birth order affects adulthood.

Evolutionary psychology (itself a controversial field) suggests the grown-up self results from the niche you pick. According to the theory, each kid is vying for attention of the parents, but they do so in different ways — carving out niches like Darwin's finches. One kid's an actor, another a star student, another an athlete; call it "Royal Tenenbaums" syndrome. The privilege of the first kid, then, is that she gets to stake out her niche before any competitors emerge.

Similarly, older siblings have a big developmental advantage over the younger. It's hard to be stronger or smarter than your older sibling, but it's not that hard to be funnier. Thus all the younger-sibling comedians.

"You can be a baby and make your siblings laugh without even meaning to," he says. "The more you notice that people pay attention to me when I laugh as a toddler or make jokes as a toddler or do a silly thing, the more that gets reinforced."

At the same time, if you have a sibling that's a little bit better than you at a sport, that can be motivating: you'll be exposed to sports earlier, and constantly striving to meet a standard that's higher than what you would've had as the first born. (See Michael Jordan's older-by-eleven-months brother Larry. Their dad thought Larry was the son with the real talent for basketball).

And when you're younger (especially when you're the third or fourth one born), you don't grow up in a world of adults, you grow up in a world of kids. So you're more likely to try and impress them.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30337
  • naturally occurring compounds
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114753 on: May 22, 2016, 03:16:27 PM »
.

Do they synthol their delts just like the men do? 

Seems they all have these weird proportions these days.

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114754 on: May 22, 2016, 03:51:55 PM »



Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 55658
  • Liberals..Dumbest People on the Planet! MAGA
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114755 on: May 22, 2016, 04:01:22 PM »
Quote from: Tristan Issé
After the Supreme Court's historic ruling on gay marriage, it seemed like all the proudly homophobic Christians came out of the woodwork to talk about how much they still hate gay people. As a straight Jew, the homophobia amongst Jesus's followers has always struck me as a bit of a surprise: Worshipping at the feet of a ripped, hung man, seems at least a little homoerotic.

But it's Jesus himself who lights up my gaydar like a Christmas tree.

He's a skinny young otter-like guy, flocked by a mess of dudes, telling everyone to love and care about each other, who later gets the shit beaten out of him by a bunch of closed-minded conservatives who are terrified of change.

As it turns out, this is not a unique theory.
Dr. Reverend Bob Shore-Goss, an openly gay senior pastor, has written several books on the subject, including Queering Christ and Jesus ACTED UP: A Gay and Lesbian Manifesto.

He holds a doctorate degree in Comparative Religion from Harvard, and he serves on the National Advisory Board of the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies in Religion. Oh, and he believes that Jesus was gay. I got in touch with Reverend Goss, who laid out the Biblical evidence and explained how his theory plays out.



Was Jesus Christ gay?

Bob Shore-Goss: I would hope he is. I would project that he is. For my own spirituality, I would love to jump into bed with Jesus. At the very least, Jesus was queer. That is to say: He broke the rules of his culture, of heteronormativity. He subverted masculinities and gender codes in his culture. Queer doesn't necessarily mean sexual orientation, but it can include that. St. Paul, I would say, would probably be described as a closeted homosexual today, but they didn't have those words at the time.

How was homosexuality perceived in Jesus's time?
There was no concept of sexual orientation, but there was a concept of gender. So, in the Bible, when a man sleeps with another man like with a woman, it's an abomination. See, the emphasis is on a man betraying his status: He has feminized himself. So it's a gender violation as opposed to a sexual violation. The code of masculinity is very strong in the ancient world. Now, homoerotic relationships in the ancient world are really common, especially in the Greek and Roman worlds.

Does Jesus himself ever address that?
As a matter of fact, one of Jesus's miracles is the healing the Centurion's boy. It's in Matthew and Luke. Matthew uses the word "pais"—you get the word pederasty from it, it means youth—to describe this boy, who is essentially a concubine to the Centurian. It's an erotic relationship. He comes to Jesus and asks for his boy to be healed. And Jesus asks if he should heal him, and he says, "I'm not worthy that you should come under my roof, but say the word and my boy will be healed." Jesus says about the faith of the Centurion, who is in a homoerotic relationship, that "there is no greater faith than I've encountered in Israel."

What's great about that is that every time you go to communion on Sunday, millions of Catholics say, "Lord, I'm not worthy to receive you, but only say the word and I shall be healed."

They're uttering this homoerotic phrase that was uttered by a Centurion in an actual homosexual relationship with a youth.

We've just sanitized that and forgotten those sort of things in the meantime. But a church of the second century would understand that this is a homosexual relationship and it wasn't a big deal.
Q

archie

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 443
  • Victory Loves Preparation
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114756 on: May 22, 2016, 04:33:53 PM »


axestream

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1854
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114758 on: May 23, 2016, 02:08:19 AM »
.

FitnessFrenzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29808
  • coup de grâce
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114759 on: May 23, 2016, 03:21:23 AM »

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31840
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114760 on: May 23, 2016, 06:48:00 AM »
A top psychologist explains how birth order may affect your success

http://www.techinsider.io/adam-grant-birth-order-predicts-success-2016-2?utm_content=buffer4028e&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer-ti



There's got to be something about birth order and success — why else would it be a staple of conversation on first dates and in networking events?  — but science hasn't quite figured out what.

It's a "widely controversial" field, explains University of Pennsylvania psychologist Adam Grant, but a worthwhile one for evaluating.

In "Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World," Grant takes a dive into birth order research. He unearths two surprising findings: many of the top base stealers in Major League Baseball history were younger siblings. The same hold true with top comedians.

At the same time, studies indicate that first-born kids are more ambitious when it comes to advancing their education, score higher on IQ tests, and go further in business than their siblings.

Older (and only) siblings tend to be more conventionally successful, Grant says.

"They grow up in a world of adults who are generally smarter than children and they want to please adults, " he says. "And the way to do that is you succeed in conventional ways."

But a lot of these birth order discussions are speculative.

"It's really hard to test a lot of these mechanisms and the kind of careful research that needs to be done hasn't been done yet to really explain why," he says, "but I think there are a couple things that are likely to be going on."

That said, there are some compelling explanations for how birth order affects adulthood.

Evolutionary psychology (itself a controversial field) suggests the grown-up self results from the niche you pick. According to the theory, each kid is vying for attention of the parents, but they do so in different ways — carving out niches like Darwin's finches. One kid's an actor, another a star student, another an athlete; call it "Royal Tenenbaums" syndrome. The privilege of the first kid, then, is that she gets to stake out her niche before any competitors emerge.

Similarly, older siblings have a big developmental advantage over the younger. It's hard to be stronger or smarter than your older sibling, but it's not that hard to be funnier. Thus all the younger-sibling comedians.

"You can be a baby and make your siblings laugh without even meaning to," he says. "The more you notice that people pay attention to me when I laugh as a toddler or make jokes as a toddler or do a silly thing, the more that gets reinforced."

At the same time, if you have a sibling that's a little bit better than you at a sport, that can be motivating: you'll be exposed to sports earlier, and constantly striving to meet a standard that's higher than what you would've had as the first born. (See Michael Jordan's older-by-eleven-months brother Larry. Their dad thought Larry was the son with the real talent for basketball).

And when you're younger (especially when you're the third or fourth one born), you don't grow up in a world of adults, you grow up in a world of kids. So you're more likely to try and impress them.


Also look at the Manning Brothers.  Two have a couple SuperBowl Rings each and the other is useless. 

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114761 on: May 23, 2016, 06:54:47 AM »


The resistance degree of Basil's biceps supinator machine

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30337
  • naturally occurring compounds
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114762 on: May 23, 2016, 08:11:58 AM »
Also look at the Manning Brothers.  Two have a couple SuperBowl Rings each and the other is useless. 

I believe he has some sort of disability.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114763 on: May 23, 2016, 11:04:33 AM »
g

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 55658
  • Liberals..Dumbest People on the Planet! MAGA
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114764 on: May 23, 2016, 01:51:20 PM »


Q

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114765 on: May 23, 2016, 03:37:21 PM »

Voice of Doom

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3645
  • Everything is under control.
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114766 on: May 23, 2016, 03:56:50 PM »

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 55658
  • Liberals..Dumbest People on the Planet! MAGA
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114767 on: May 23, 2016, 06:20:14 PM »
Q

Gregzs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17372
  • Getbig!
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114768 on: May 23, 2016, 06:34:53 PM »

Mitch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4049
  • Team Succulent Ham of Peace
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114769 on: May 23, 2016, 11:46:46 PM »

FitnessFrenzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29808
  • coup de grâce
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114770 on: May 24, 2016, 03:05:48 AM »

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114771 on: May 24, 2016, 03:12:33 AM »

Europe

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1976
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114772 on: May 24, 2016, 03:29:29 AM »

Tedim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4144
  • "Ну GetBig, ну погоди"
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114773 on: May 24, 2016, 03:32:28 AM »


Kwon posted....

So they're probably obese wildebeests

DroppingPlates

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 49987
  • Team Pocahontas
Re: Re: Random pics
« Reply #114774 on: May 24, 2016, 04:11:35 AM »
Kwon posted....

So they're probably obese wildebeests

They pass for their oral exams anyway, no matter the hippo sizes of their asses