Using post vaccine stats to show that the vaccine isn’t needed?
That’s like claiming that exercise and healthy eating wasn't necessary for me because I've never been overweight.
🙄
2,704 of 28,557,431 Canadians under age 60 have died of Covid in Canada
in total since the start of the pandemic - see updated death numbers below.
That's 1 in 10,561.
Incidentally, these death numbers are not going down much in Canada:
2020: 15,569.
2021: 14,473 - with 86.2% FULLY VACCINATED.
2022: 7,362 - on track for 15K+ deaths again.
But even if they are - so say I had a 1 in 10,000 chance of dying of Covid pre-vaccine, and have a 1 in 60,000 chance of dying now.
So?
Why would I care about going from a 99.99% chance of surviving to a 99.998% chance of surviving? Especially since the real number WITHOUT the vaccine is probably closer to 99.998% already, and given that the vaccine long-term side effects yet to be seen.
Why would I take part in a human medical trial over a virus I have a 99.99% chance of surviving? And one I already got hit pretty hard with in the First Wave, when Covid was at its most lethal ["lethal"]. Which means I already roughly know what damage this virus is capable of for me [not much], and should still have some natural immunity left, over two years later, given how relatively hard-hit I was from it [3 days buildup, 6 days sick, 11 days of sniffles].