Gasps as Breitbart Exposé on Trump New York Judge’s Clerk Takes Center Stage

[Soul Crusher]

I heard that in NY there doesn’t have to be a victim in cases like this. 🤷‍♂️

Its political theatre for TDS nuts.   

[Grape Ape]

I heard that in NY there doesn’t have to be a victim in cases like this. 🤷‍♂️

That is correct.

The question is, if this sham of a trial holds up, will they go after every real estate agent in NY who does this on a regular basis?

Of course not.

[Soul Crusher]

That is correct.

The question is, if this sham of a trial holds up, will they go after every real estate agent in NY who does this on a regular basis?

Of course not.

Not a single bank has appeared as a witness to say they were defrauded or screwed out of money as a result of alleged fraud. 

The lunatics and deranged nuts look so bad with all of this 

[Grape Ape]

Not a single bank has appeared as a witness to say they were defrauded or screwed out of money as a result of alleged fraud. 

The lunatics and deranged nuts look so bad with all of this

Trump will lose because of a biased judge and no jury.

Can he appeal afterwards?

[Irongrip400]

Trump will lose because of a biased judge and no jury.

Can he appeal afterwards?

Evidently that’s one of the reasons they said he’s had so many outbursts, that he’s trying to get the judge to meltdown and give him a reason to appeal. Either that or he just can’t control himself.

[Grape Ape]

Evidently that’s one of the reasons they said he’s had so many outbursts, that he’s trying to get the judge to meltdown and give him a reason to appeal. Either that or he just can’t control himself.

There are plenty of legit criticisms to levy against DJT.

This one isn't one of them, and is a politiial weaponization of the judicial system.

Just like the case with Alvin Bragg, I hope this eventually costs James her job, because it's not how our system is supposed to operate.

[LurkerNoMore]

Why is there even a trial?  There is no victim.

You damn well know why.  Playing coy is silly. 

[Coach is Back!]

You damn well know why.  Playing coy is silly.

“$18 million” for Mar-A-Lago 🤣

[LurkerNoMore]

“$18 million” for Mar-A-Lago 🤣

“Witch Hunt” for 90+ felony charges.  😂

[Coach is Back!]

“Witch Hunt” for 90+ felony charges.  😂

All legit hahaha

[Agnostic007]

All legit hahaha

The great thing about the judicial system is that it doesn't matter if you or I agree with a particular outcome. It's the best system in the world and as a blue blooded American I am shocked you mock a system, the best in the world that an American should be proud of. 

[Coach is Back!]

The great thing about the judicial system is that it doesn't matter if you or I agree with a particular outcome. It's the best system in the world and as a blue blooded American I am shocked you mock a system, the best in the world that an American should be proud of.

It’s not where the districts are 95% + Democrats like Manhattan, DC and Atlanta. Think Moscow trials

[Vince G, CSN MFT]

Why is there even a trial?  There is no victim.

The American Taxpayer is. 

[Agnostic007]

It’s not where the districts are 95% + Democrats like Manhattan, DC and Atlanta. Think Moscow trials

Commie!!

[Agnostic007]

The American Taxpayer is.

It's over his head Vince

[LurkerNoMore]

All legit hahaha

As legit as that future amended tax bill he is going to receive over it.  GOOD TIMES. 

[Soul Crusher]

The American Taxpayer is.

How? 

[Coach is Back!]

Commie!!

Yes, they are. 100%

[OzmO]

The great thing about the judicial system is that it doesn't matter if you or I agree with a particular outcome. It's the best system in the world and as a blue blooded American I am shocked you mock a system, the best in the world that an American should be proud of.

It's not perfect for sure, but what are the alternatives?  What's crazy to me is that its journey to truth and justice always comes into question when someone's beliefs contradict a verdict.

[Grape Ape]

It's not perfect for sure, but what are the alternatives?  What's crazy to me is that its journey to truth and justice always comes into question when someone's beliefs contradict a verdict.

Comments about one specific trial aren't necessarily a critique of the overall system.

But, when someone runs a campaign on prosecuting Trump, gets him to trial with no jury, a judge and his team that are on the other side of the political aisle, with charges that have no victim, it needs to be questions.

Because it's true, if they do this to him, they can do it to whoever they want.  That's why i asked about the possibility for appeal, because there has to be a check and balance here.

[Primemuscle]

Ive read the article and i stand behind what i said and Trump is using his cronies to dig up dirt .  Now people are threatening the law clerk's family members. 

He is only going to make things worse for him

When Coach tells Folks to 'read the article' or that they didn't read it, what he really means is read into the article what he mistakenly did and not what it states. His is a disorder known as "cognitive illusion'.

[OzmO]

Comments about one specific trial aren't necessarily a critique of the overall system.

But, when someone runs a campaign on prosecuting Trump, gets him to trial with no jury, a judge and his team that are on the other side of the political aisle, with charges that have no victim, it needs to be questions.

Because it's true, if they do this to him, they can do it to whoever they want.  That's why i asked about the possibility for appeal, because there has to be a check and balance here.

I have issues with the draconian approach in this trial.   Having no victim is not a factor for me as the charges are based on an existing law.   Now maybe the law should be changed but the biggest issue is the penalties in that he loses his company and gets fined 250 million.  I think they are not nearly any bit appropiate to the crime. 

I don’t subscribe too much to the judge being on the left side because I believe the crime still has to be proven and each side gets their turn and that there is likely plenty of evidence saying he did commit fraud. 

[Coach is Back!]

When Coach tells Folks to 'read the article' or that they didn't read it, what he really means is read into the article what he mistakenly did and not what it states. His is a disorder known as "cognitive illusion'.

So you’re saying that the article didn’t state she made all of those donations or did you miss that part because you didn’t read it even though I copied and pasted it for you to read?

[Primemuscle]

So you’re saying that the article didn’t state she made all of those donations or did you miss that part because you didn’t read it even though I copied and pasted it for you to read?

Did I say that the article you copied and pasted did not state she made 'all' those donations? When and where did I say this? I checked my posts and found nothing of the sort. Are you replying to Vince and got confused? Or, maybe you imagined it or made this up.

[LurkerNoMore]

Yes, they are. 100%

He could have typed Marxist or Socialist and you would have posted the same thing because you can’t tell the difference of any.