Author Topic: Top Ten Arms (Read 24117 times)

freeagain · « **Reply #50 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:06:21 AM »

dorian was a monstrous bodybuilder .. but his arms were a bit s.hit!

he had great tris n forearms but the bicep is the showpiece muscle of that limb and his were ... well ..... a bit s'hit!

vince taylor's got some swole biceps .....

bmacsys · « **Reply #51 on:** May 06, 2006, 09:24:35 AM »

Quote from: Kaliym73 on May 05, 2006, 07:05:02 PM

What about Albert Beckles.

I was at the contest where Ken Passarielo wore that Kiss make up. He came in dead last. Beckles won the show.

rocky255 · « **Reply #52 on:** May 06, 2006, 02:00:59 PM »

Casey Viator HAS TO BE IN THE PICK

LuciusFox · « **Reply #53 on:** May 06, 2006, 04:51:57 PM »

Quote from: gh15 on May 06, 2006, 12:17:19 AM

im talking about the whole arm which includes the 2 heads of bicep + 3 heads of tricep. i also take into consideration height and weight.

not to forget!!! mr swartz was 6'1 and a half!! weighin 225-240 on stage! if you take this into consideration and you know that every inch = 7 pounds and all of us bodybuilders know that 1 inch = about 7 pounds on a male...then you would know that if arnold was 5'11 like ron he would be about 15-18 pounds lighter which would make him 210lb on stage!!!

now show me any other 5'11 210lb bodybuilder that has/had/will ever have 22 inch arms. i would love to see him. (no synthol used!)

arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER. (weight taken into consideration) while dorian and lee are the worst but i chose dorian as the worst due to his over all mass advantage over lee which should have given him a hell of a lot bigger/better shaped arms than what he had. he still was an awesome bodybuilder though.

* arnold had very good triceps but his biceps were simply phenominal+

""" arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER"""....I'm sorry to say this, but you just lost a lot of credibility with this post $:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #54 on:** May 06, 2006, 04:57:02 PM »

Quote from: bmacsys on May 06, 2006, 09:24:35 AM

I was at the contest where Ken Passarielo wore that Kiss make up. He came in dead last. Beckles won the show.

Speak of the devil !!

Parker · « **Reply #55 on:** May 06, 2006, 05:15:21 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 06, 2006, 04:51:57 PM

arnold is BY FAR the best arms in bodybuilding EVER....I'm sorry to say this, but you just lost a lot of credibility with this post $:-\$

You on some Jesus Juice? Arnold himself pointed out that his arms were flawed. How can he have the best arms if he stated that they were less than perfect. Plus, many bbers came after him. Sergio's arms dwarfed Arnold's, but Arnold's were more cut, Arnold was more conditioned than Sergio overall

LuciusFox · « **Reply #56 on:** May 06, 2006, 05:18:13 PM »

Quote from: Parker on May 06, 2006, 05:15:21 PM

You on some Jesus Juice? Arnold himself pointed out that his arms were flawed. How can he have the best arms if he stated that they were less than perfect. Plus, many bbers came after him. Sergio's arms dwarfed Arnold's, but Arnold's were more cut, Arnold was more conditioned than Sergio overall

I guess it wasn't clear that I was quoting him and disagreeing. I think he hurt his reputation with that post.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #57 on:** May 06, 2006, 05:52:28 PM »

Arnold had good triceps , not great but good !!

gibberj2 · « **Reply #58 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:05:41 PM »

Why is everyone going so crazy about Coleman's arms? That so called peaked bicep looks like a little ball on top of a tricep. Someone like Arnold, Lee Priest or Markus Ruhl has a peaked bicep but it's also very full.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #59 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:09:32 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 06, 2006, 06:05:41 PM

Why is everyone going so crazy about Coleman's arms? That so called peaked bicep looks like a little ball on top of a tricep. Someone like Arnold, Lee Priest or Markus Ruhl has a peaked bicep but it's also very full.

You have a point , people tend to go crazy because of the sheer size of his arms and his peakes are freaky but Lee Preist's arms are better no question about it , and look how small Coleman's forearms are in that pic .

knny187 · « **Reply #60 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:09:54 PM »

thats why so many people use Larry Scott as an example.

His biceps weren't "peaked" like Arnolds per se....

but the balance between his biceps & triceps were amazing.

Then...his bicep seemed to go tight to the elbow with no gap.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #61 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:12:20 PM »

my terminology may not be correct but see what i mean about biceps looking full or whatever?

LuciusFox · « **Reply #62 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:13:29 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 06, 2006, 06:05:41 PM

Why is everyone going so crazy about Coleman's arms? That so called peaked bicep looks like a little ball on top of a tricep. Someone like Arnold, Lee Priest or Markus Ruhl has a peaked bicep but it's also very full.

That's not even a good picture

It looks more like 2 balls on his triceps

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #63 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:15:27 PM »

Pastell had amazing arms

knny187 · « **Reply #64 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:16:17 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 06, 2006, 06:15:27 PM

Pastell had amazing arms

I agree with that & whats more amazing is his height!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #65 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:16:34 PM »

Quote from: knny187 on May 06, 2006, 06:09:54 PM

thats why so many people use Larry Scott as an example.

His biceps weren't "peaked" like Arnolds per se....

but the balance between his biceps & triceps were amazing.

Then...his bicep seemed to go tight to the elbow with no gap.

Too bad his delts were missing in action

gibberj2 · « **Reply #66 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:18:16 PM »

that's what i'm saying. they look like little tennis balls on top of big triceps.

FREAKgeek · « **Reply #67 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:18:19 PM »

Quote from: Parker on May 06, 2006, 05:15:21 PM

You on some Jesus Juice? Arnold himself pointed out that his arms were flawed. How can he have the best arms if he stated that they were less than perfect. Plus, many bbers came after him. Sergio's arms dwarfed Arnold's, but Arnold's were more cut, Arnold was more conditioned than Sergio overall

If you consider criteria such as historical influential factors, then Arnold has one of the best pairs. Arnold's arms and chest was a role model for BBing.

knny187 · « **Reply #68 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:19:44 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 06, 2006, 06:16:34 PM

Too bad his delts were missing in action

Well it was enough back in the day to give him an "O"

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #69 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:20:41 PM »

Lee and Vince , Lee's arms are outstanding !!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #70 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:25:19 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 06, 2006, 06:18:16 PM

that's what i'm saying. they look like little tennis balls on top of big triceps.

Let's see a pic of your arms

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #71 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:27:40 PM »

Larry Scott's arms were ............... add your own adjective !!

gibberj2 · « **Reply #72 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:28:06 PM »

well one thing i can say is that they're bigger than yours. anyway i'm just saying that coleman doesn't belong with lee priest or arnold.

knny187 · « **Reply #73 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:29:37 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 06, 2006, 06:27:40 PM

Larry Scott's arms were pretty damn impressive fill in your own adjective !!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #74 on:** May 06, 2006, 06:32:02 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on May 06, 2006, 06:28:06 PM

well one thing i can say is that they're bigger than yours. anyway i'm just saying that coleman doesn't belong with lee priest or arnold.

Coleman is definitely in the same category as those guys when it comes to arms. They are better than Arnold's.