RIP - Charlie Kirk Shot Dead at Utah University - 2025-09-10

[Kwon]

The interviewer Mario Nawfal is a c4nt. Tried to extort money from me (well his team did)

!!!


WHY!

[dj181]

I know it's rage bait... but these people celebrating online are demonic, pure evil, just look at how the guys tongue moves when he laughs, some unnatural shit.  The women so smug and laughing hysterically like a fucking witch. I pity these spiteful leftist mutants.   

https://x.com/onebaddude_/status/1967305387792875658?s=46

https://x.com/1amerpatmrs/status/1967343523784806433?s=46

It sure is demonic

You are spot on

Would enjoy having them in the sights of my m14 😉

[38 returns]

It sure is demonic

You are spot on

Would enjoy having them in the sights of my m14 😉

you dont have an M14 and have never shot anyone in your life. absolute fantasist.

[Super Nattie]

[dj181]

∆∆∆ demonic shit right there

[Van_Bilderass]

.

[King Shizzo]

.

So we get autistic tranny death cults before GTA 6

[Grape Ape]

Was Charlie Kirk truly an advocate of free speech?

Just explain what foreign news story you're responding to.

[B_B_C]

Just explain what foreign news story you're responding to.

I know he had that reputation

I am sorry that you feel unable to answer the question

[Grape Ape]

I know he had that reputation

I am sorry that you feel unable to answer the question

It feels like bait.

But, yes, he was.

[Coach is Back!]

I know he had that reputation

I am sorry that you feel unable to answer the question

I'd be willing to bet that you didn't know much of him until this happened. Am I right?

[B_B_C]

It feels like bait.

But, yes, he was.

Only you can control your feelings

While I can understand the anger and out rage it seems some of his many of his grieving followers do not understand or respect his advocacy of free speech.

[Lartinos]

Only you can control your feelings

While I can understand the anger and out rage it seems some of his many of his grieving followers do not understand or respect his advocacy of free speech.

It’s mostly private companies firing these people.

They are allowed free speech and also to be fired for being jackasses.

[B_B_C]

I'd be willing to bet that you didn't know much of him until this happened. Am I right?

I did know quiet a bit about him but I was never  as star struck about him as you seem to be

[Coach is Back!]

I did know quiet a bit about him but I was never  as star struck about him as you seem to be

No one is "star struck". If you knew 'quite a bit" about him as you claim, you would understand his and TPUSA's impact on changing the political landscape with the youth.

[GymnJuice]

It’s mostly private companies firing these people.

They are allowed free speech and also to be fired for being jackasses.

That is my understanding as well. The free speech mostly means you don't get arrested for your personal thoughts about events, politics, or whatever. It doesn't keep your private company employer from firing you.

I am a big supporter of free speech BTW. Even if someone wants to be a jackass about the Kirk thing and say he deserved to die or was a scumbag or whatever else. It is their right to say it. It is also their employers right to fire them. But they should not be arrested for saying it.

[Van_Bilderass]

Governments often pressure private companies to censor certain speech, as even Zuckerberg will attest to, e.g. the Hunter laptop. And sometimes what is private and what is government is murky as governments contract out so many things. So many things are private that companies can theoretically lock you in your house preventing you from using what most would consider public squares. They can and will shut you out of all banking. Travel. And et cetera.

The Fuentes guy is on a no fly list for reasons unknown, no charges brought, shut out of most banking too.

[Grape Ape]

Only you can control your feelings

While I can understand the anger and out rage it seems some of his many of his grieving followers do not understand or respect his advocacy of free speech.

Free speech does not mean speech without consequence.

There's a difference.

But instead of asking a question hoping it would lead to your point, why not just make your point first instead?

[GymnJuice]

Governments often pressure private companies to censor certain speech, as even Zuckerberg will attest to, e.g. the Hunter laptop. And sometimes what is private and what is government is murky as governments contract out so many things. So many things are private that companies can theoretically lock you in your house preventing you from using what most would consider public squares. They can and will shut you out of all banking. Travel. And et cetera.

The Fuentes guy is on a no fly list for reasons unknown, no charges brought, shut out of most banking too.

You're right. Both sides just pay lip service to free speech. Most would eagerly censor anything that suits their agenda. Only a handful stay true to their principles over party loyalty. The US would be so much better off with a viable third party.

[B_B_C]

Free speech does not mean speech without consequence.

There's a difference.

But instead of asking a question hoping it would lead to your point, why not just make your point first instead?

if it bothers you so move on
you sound like a spinster teacher   Miss Brodie   on the cusp of middle age -

[obsidian]

Charlie wore a bulletproof vest and took precautions — no doubt multiple death threats had been made against him. And yet, the surrounding rooftops weren’t secured — again, just like with Trump. That’s basic Security 101. They should have been monitoring the roofs. People even spotted the gunman there before Charlie was killed. WTF?! This shooting should never have happened. They allowed it to happen.

[B_B_C]

https://www.wionews.com/world/-hell-call-their-employer-jd-vance-backs-mass-doxing-campaign-to-find-and-harass-charlie-kirk-critics-tyler-robinson-1758031493960

'Hell, call their employer': JD Vance calls for mass ‘doxing’ to find and harass Charlie Kirk critics

Vance's statement came after the Attorney General Pam Bondi said the government will “target” those who use hate speech before “across the aisle.”

“We will absolutely target you, go after you, if you are targeting anyone with hate speech, anything, and that’s across the aisle," she said.

[Grape Ape]

if it bothers you so move on
you sound like a spinster teacher   Miss Brodie   on the cusp of middle age -

Nothing you do here bothers me in the slightest, because you've never really brought anything memorable or thought provoking.

Bring some original thoughts of your own and maybe I'll reconsider.  But so far your only contributions are memes, bait, and ad-hominem attacks.

[J. Richards]

Charlie wore a bulletproof vest and took precautions — no doubt multiple death threats had been made against him. And yet, the surrounding rooftops weren’t secured — again, just like with Trump. That’s basic Security 101. They should have been monitoring the roofs. People even spotted the gunman there before Charlie was killed. WTF?! This shooting should never have happened. They allowed it to happen.

in this golden age of "Drones"...  and none to be seen hovering as security... pretty stupid really...

[Moontrane]

Charlie wore a bulletproof vest and took precautions — no doubt multiple death threats had been made against him. And yet, the surrounding rooftops weren’t secured — again, just like with Trump. That’s basic Security 101. They should have been monitoring the roofs. People even spotted the gunman there before Charlie was killed. WTF?! This shooting should never have happened. They allowed it to happen.

A few trained drone operators scrutinizing the venue could've prevented the shooting.  Same with Trump in PA.