Author Topic: Awesome Dorian Clip (Read 10133 times)

gordiano · « **Reply #25 on:** July 13, 2006, 03:25:23 AM »

GODDAMMIT!

Not another Dorian vs. Ronnie thread!

HUGEPECS · « **Reply #26 on:** July 13, 2006, 05:42:45 AM »

Quote from: gordiano on July 13, 2006, 03:25:23 AM

GODDAMMIT!

Not another Dorian vs. Ronnie thread!

LMAO....I KNOW. THERE'S A VERY LONG FCUKING THREAD ABOUT THIS SHIT ALREADY. LET'S NOT START ANOTHER ONE

pumpster · « **Reply #27 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:13:39 AM »

Quote

since when has ronnie's back been known for his width. jay and gunter both have wider backs than coleman. coleman has more thickness and detail.

dorian destroys coleman in lat width and the rear lat spread.

You are remarkably unobservant; relative to his height & waist width, Coleman has the widest lats and greatest taper ever. DUH!

What Yates had was tremendous density, dryness, hardness & separation, which is why his back can look just as good even with a little less width and taper to a small waist than Coleman has. Yates' back was actually his only major muscle group on par with Coleman's other than triceps, which is arguable. Which back you prefer just comes down to a matter of taste.

The widest back..truly silly to suggest otherwise; Yates never had this kind of width/size & taper. I like Yates back better myself, but not because it's wider, it's not:

pumpster · « **Reply #28 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:16:13 AM »

Yates with hardness, dryness & density, Coleman wider w/ better taper to a smaller waist.

Dredlock Rasta · « **Reply #29 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:19:53 AM »

Ronnie beats dorian hands down. 280 lbs guy vs. a 260 lbs guy. Who wins?

pumpster · « **Reply #30 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:21:40 AM »

Quote

Ronnie beats dorian hands down. 280 lbs guy vs. a 260 lbs guy. Who wins?

Your clear perceptions of reality aren't evident to those with superficial understandings of BB.

Quote

Look at the fucking width of his back! hell even Ronnies hasnt left that kind of impression on me!!!

He had a great back. Not nearly the widest or best tape though, it was for other reasons.

natural al · « **Reply #31 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:48:37 AM »

I wonder if anyone can even type "Dorian" without it turning into a dorian vs. Ronnie slugfest.

delta9mda · « **Reply #32 on:** July 13, 2006, 08:50:00 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 12, 2006, 04:40:13 PM

yeah, I missed that ridiculous statement.

Ronnie (since the late 90's anyway) ALWAYS been known for his width:

rons great but he really looks like a load of shit right here

Rambone · « **Reply #33 on:** July 13, 2006, 08:56:48 AM »

Quote from: delta9mda on July 13, 2006, 08:50:00 AM

rons great but he really looks like a load of shit right here

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #34 on:** July 13, 2006, 12:57:25 PM »

Quote from: gordiano on July 13, 2006, 03:25:23 AM

GODDAMMIT!

Not another Dorian vs. Ronnie thread!

What do you care?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

UK Gold · « **Reply #35 on:** July 13, 2006, 01:36:13 PM »

What was Dorians posing music in 92 [or maybe it was 93]. The one with the black chick wailing "get down"

Hulkster · « **Reply #36 on:** July 13, 2006, 01:45:28 PM »

I can't believe that there are people out there who suggest that Ronnie has never been known for his back width..

Shockwave · « **Reply #37 on:** July 13, 2006, 01:49:49 PM »

Please... for the love of god... keep this in the OTHER THREAD!
I think it's almost mandatory. ANY mention of Dorian's name, and the Colemaniacs come running.

Scimowser · « **Reply #38 on:** July 13, 2006, 02:44:25 PM »

exactly, all i said was that ronnies back width hadnt left as much of an impression on me. When the camera is behind him and hes walking up on stage his back is unbelieveable. Its always the same pictures, always the same posts whenever someone mentions their bloody name

Rambone · « **Reply #39 on:** July 13, 2006, 07:08:04 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on July 12, 2006, 03:39:14 PM

since when has ronnie's back been known for his width. jay and gunter both have wider backs than coleman.

I think it was more this post that started the whole thing

IceCold · « **Reply #40 on:** July 14, 2006, 11:33:38 AM »

Quote from: Rambone on July 13, 2006, 07:08:04 PM

I think it was more this post that started the whole thing

i responded to the comment made by titusisback.

besides, my original comment is true.

all hulkster did was post pics of coleman being compares to kris dim and by himself which doesnt really prove anything other than that coleman has a great back, which we all already knew.

Hulkster · « **Reply #41 on:** July 14, 2006, 02:06:55 PM »

Ronnie has never really faced anyone with a really wide back (other than Dillett in 1999)

Dorian too faced Dillett, but no one else with a wide back.

Which is wider is hard to tell.

But which has a more dramatic taper, well, thats easy.

oh, and I doubt Gunter and Jay have never had wider backs than Ronnie, unless you count 2005.

hell, in 2002 gunter outweighed Ronnie by about 50 pounds, and even then, he still compared to back width like this:

Scimowser · « **Reply #42 on:** July 14, 2006, 02:16:54 PM »

Nobody has a wider back than what Orville Burke had and he faced Ronnie. DJ has insane back width also, regardless of his genetically high lats

Hulkster · « **Reply #43 on:** July 14, 2006, 02:21:34 PM »

back in 2001, Ronnie did appear a lot wider than Dennis, but that might just be the taper differences. In terms of absolute width, its hard to say.

but dennis was nowhere near the peak he was at the 2003 Olympia, probably his career best.

pumpster · « **Reply #44 on:** July 14, 2006, 02:23:54 PM »

Quote

exactly, all i said was that ronnies back width hadnt left as much of an impression on me.

You also said it lacked width relatively speaking, which means you really aren't qualified to even be on a BB board. Seriously, that's a stupid "observation", especially since, as shown in that last pic, the huge width goes with a smaller waist = greater taper.

Ex Coelis · « **Reply #45 on:** July 14, 2006, 02:53:17 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 14, 2006, 02:23:54 PM

You also said it lacked width relatively speaking, which means you really aren't qualified to even be on a BB board. Seriously, that's a stupid "observation", especially since, as shown in that last pic, the huge width goes with a smaller waist = greater taper.

it doesn't always seem like Ronnie opens it up all the way. Even then he's still wider than most

IceCold · « **Reply #46 on:** July 14, 2006, 10:31:18 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on July 14, 2006, 02:06:55 PM

Ronnie has never really faced anyone with a really wide back (other than Dillett in 1999)

Dorian too faced Dillett, but no one else with a wide back.

Which is wider is hard to tell.

But which has a more dramatic taper, well, thats easy.

oh, and I doubt Gunter and Jay have never had wider backs than Ronnie, unless you count 2005.

hell, in 2002 gunter outweighed Ronnie by about 50 pounds, and even then, he still compared to back width like this:

absolutely ronnie has a much better taper than dorian. ronnie's hips are narrower and his back is low and wide.

dorian also competed against kevin, and kevin's lat spread aint all that bad.

Scimowser · « **Reply #47 on:** July 15, 2006, 03:29:16 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on July 14, 2006, 02:23:54 PM

You also said it lacked width relatively speaking, which means you really aren't qualified to even be on a BB board. Seriously, that's a stupid "observation", especially since, as shown in that last pic, the huge width goes with a smaller waist = greater taper.

ok fucking genius, show me where i even implied that ronnie lacked back width. Hell ronnie has a bigger back than 99% of all human existance, all i said was that his back hadnt left that much of an impression on me. Youre so far up Colemans arse you should be a dildo

pumpster · « **Reply #48 on:** July 15, 2006, 05:14:56 AM »

You mean like someone in kindergarden I have to go back and show you where you implied that his relative width was superior?

Quote

Look at the fucking width of his back! hell even Ronnies hasnt left that kind of impression on me!!!

The width was never his strong point..now you know.

This one's even more mindless....

Quote

Quote from: IceCold on July 12, 2006, 06:39:14 PM
since when has ronnie's back been known for his width. jay and gunter both have wider backs than coleman. coleman has more thickness and detail.

dorian destroys coleman in lat width and the rear lat spread.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #49 on:** July 15, 2006, 05:44:16 AM »

I think Dennis could match or maybe surpass slightly Ronnie on lat width and remember he is shorter than Ronnie .

Author Topic: Awesome Dorian Clip (Read 10133 times)

suckmymuscle