I am not an Undertaker fan by any means. The highlight of the match for me was Lesnar shutting down that stupid Old School move that did absolutely nothing but the opponent had to sell it like a chair shot.
It makes sense to give the win to Brock. You can't call him a part time wrestler when UT only wrestled once a year. That is why they gave it to Brock. He will only wrestle once or twice... just like UT did. Make him into the Wrestlemania Legend that remains unbeaten. (Don't know his prior WM track record and won't look it up)
You must have a short memory. Triple H beat him last year (and Goldberg beat him, in that garbage match, 10 years ago).
They had to pass the torch to someone and having someone who is going to wrestle and job at point during the year will not make sense and make them seem so dominant on the day of WM.
'Taker is part time, due to his injuries. He's paid his dues in the ring, which is why I wish he stayed undefeated at WrestleMania. It's the only thing that separates him from the other guys, given their longer/more frequent title reigns and being given the proverbial keys to the kingdom or the ball.
Come on! Punk gets a 14-month title reign but 'Taker doesn't? That's ridiculous.
The ending they did for WM27 should have been duplicated at 30: Have Lesnar beat Undertaker silly for 90% of the match, only to have the Deadman pull some rabbit out of his hat (a new submission move or even a cheap roll-up). 'Taker gets the win but is busted up and carted out on a stretcher or in an ambulance.
As I said earlier, Austin got over Bret Hart, without ever pinning the Hitman or getting him to submit. He LOST at WM13 but got launched big time.
Lesnar gets over as a monster; 'Taker retires with streak intact; all is right with the world.