Author Topic: Richard Dawkins Reads His Hate Mail. (Read 7019 times)

suckmymuscle · « **on:** March 31, 2011, 04:43:30 PM »

Lol, this is hilarious...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ursus · « **Reply #1 on:** March 31, 2011, 04:46:59 PM »

How can a evolutionist be an authority on religion?

They are not mutually exclusive.

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. His thoughts do not personally affect me or my life.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #2 on:** March 31, 2011, 04:52:39 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on March 31, 2011, 04:46:59 PM

How can a evolutionist be an authority on religion?

Your mistake is in assuming that religion is a proper field of study...

Quote

They are not mutually exclusive.

What? This works against your argument since if they are not mutually exclusive then Dawkins can speak on it since they overlap(according to your line of reasoning). If they were mutually exclusive, then Dawkins couldn't speak on it since they would be different fiields of expertise. But this is besides the point, since religion is make-believe nonsense.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ursus · « **Reply #3 on:** March 31, 2011, 04:57:12 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 04:52:39 PM

Your mistake is in assuming that religion is a proper field of study...

What? This works against your argument since if they are not mutually exclusive then Dawkins can speak on it since they overlap(according to your line of reasoning). If they were mutually exclusive, then Dawkins couldn't speak on it since they would be different fiields of expertise. But this is besides the point, since religion is make-believe nonsense.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Theology is a field of study.

Yes but Dawkins asserts that religion is nonsense. Both can co-exist

#1 Klaus fan · « **Reply #4 on:** March 31, 2011, 04:57:45 PM »

They all sound like 15-year-olds wrote them.

Ursus · « **Reply #5 on:** March 31, 2011, 04:59:28 PM »

Yea those 'burn in hell' religious people are the idiots that make the rest of us look bad.

Extremism and fundamentalism in any form is bad IMO

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #6 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:01:23 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on March 31, 2011, 04:57:12 PM

Theology is a field of study.

No, it isn't. It is made up nonsense. I could create a field of study on fairies and proclaim it to be a proper field of study and it would be as legitimate as religion.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ursus · « **Reply #7 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:12:17 PM »

English literature is a field of study. Lots of that is made up also.

I don't care if you believe or not fact remains it is a field of study regardless if you believe it.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #8 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:28:19 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on March 31, 2011, 05:12:17 PM

English literature is a field of study. Lots of that is made up also.

Wrong. Literature studies something that exists - literary works. Theology supposedly studies something that doesen't exist or at least for which there is no evidence that He exists - God and His nature. Big difference.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

The Abdominal Snoman · « **Reply #9 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:35:19 PM »

Richard Dawson host the worlds dumbest family

Ursus · « **Reply #10 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:37:08 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 05:28:19 PM

Wrong. Literature studies something that exists - literary works. Theology supposedly studies something that doesen't exist or at least for which there is no evidence that He exists - God and His nature. Big difference.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

The bible is arguably a work of literature

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #11 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:52:26 PM »

Quote from: Ursus on March 31, 2011, 05:37:08 PM

The bible is arguably a work of literature

Apples and oranges. Studying the bible as a literary work constitutes literature, but studying the nature of the God it claims to exist does not constitute theology but simply crookery.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

ManBearPig... · « **Reply #12 on:** March 31, 2011, 05:58:36 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 05:28:19 PM

Wrong. Literature studies something that exists - literary works. Theology supposedly studies something that doesen't exist or at least for which there is no evidence that He exists - God and His nature. Big difference.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

from dictionary.com:

–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of god and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. a particular form, system, branch, or course of this study.

so, dickface, are you saying that religion doesn't exist? just stop being a fucking idiot.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #13 on:** March 31, 2011, 06:01:02 PM »

Quote from: ManBearPig... on March 31, 2011, 05:58:36 PM

from dictionary.com:

–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of god and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. a particular form, system, branch, or course of this study.

so, dickface, are you saying that religion doesn't exist? just stop being a fucking idiot.

Religion exists but doesen't constitute theology, you fucking moron. Theology is the study of God's nature. Theology is a fraud because what it proposes to study(God) is something for which there is no evidence that it exists.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Doug_Steele · « **Reply #14 on:** March 31, 2011, 06:06:26 PM »

ManBearPig... · « **Reply #15 on:** March 31, 2011, 06:08:59 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 06:01:02 PM

Religion exists but doesen't constitute theology, you fucking moron. Theology is the study of God's nature. Theology is a fraud because what it proposes to study(God) is something for which there is no evidence that it exists.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

stupid argument. most things we accept as granted because at some point we as a society agreed on its validity. such as "liberal arts". my degree says "liberal arts". what the fuck's a liberal art? on some level, it's just as crazy to believe in existence of something as abstract as a "liberal art" as it is to believe in a god.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #16 on:** March 31, 2011, 06:37:59 PM »

Quote from: ManBearPig... on March 31, 2011, 06:08:59 PM

stupid argument. most things we accept as granted because at some point we as a society agreed on its validity. such as "liberal arts". my degree says "liberal arts". what the fuck's a liberal art? on some level, it's just as crazy to believe in existence of something as abstract as a "liberal art" as it is to believe in a god.

You are truly an imbecile of gargantuan proportions. Nothing further to add.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ursus · « **Reply #17 on:** March 31, 2011, 06:41:56 PM »

What is the difference in studing the books and plays of Shakespeare and that of The Bible?

johnnynoname · « **Reply #18 on:** March 31, 2011, 06:43:28 PM »

Why is he so bitter......he seemed like such a pleasant guy on "Hogan's Heroes"

muscularny · « **Reply #19 on:** March 31, 2011, 07:31:18 PM »

anyone notice that at 2:42 someone in the room is heard saying "oh jesus"

che · « **Reply #20 on:** March 31, 2011, 07:38:06 PM »

Fuck Dawkins , he talks like he knows something that we don't know,he doesn't know shit ,fuck him.

Skeletor · « **Reply #21 on:** March 31, 2011, 10:48:36 PM »

Religion of peace.

pellius · « **Reply #22 on:** March 31, 2011, 11:18:36 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 04:52:39 PM

Your mistake is in assuming that religion is a proper field of study...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

We'll leave it to you to decide for others what is proper to study.

You are such an arrogant, self-absorb, full of yourself ass clown.

pellius · « **Reply #23 on:** March 31, 2011, 11:24:05 PM »

Quote from: ManBearPig... on March 31, 2011, 05:58:36 PM

from dictionary.com:

–noun, plural -gies.
1. the field of study and analysis that treats of god and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity.
2. a particular form, system, branch, or course of this study.

so, dickface, are you saying that religion doesn't exist? just stop being a fucking idiot.

He can't stop being an idiot because it is simply who and what he is. He can't change his nature.

pellius · « **Reply #24 on:** March 31, 2011, 11:25:23 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on March 31, 2011, 06:37:59 PM

You are truly an imbecile of gargantuan proportions. Nothing further to add.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

The irony.