Author Topic: Who Had the Best Biceps Ever??.. (Read 58695 times)

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #100 on:** April 09, 2009, 07:12:17 PM »

Quote from: webcke on April 09, 2009, 05:06:06 PM

600lbs with abs!!

both of them have bad abs!!..

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #101 on:** April 09, 2009, 07:30:16 PM »

Ronnie........

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #102 on:** April 09, 2009, 07:35:50 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on April 09, 2009, 05:09:37 PM

Another amateur analysis; Schwarzenegger and Coleman both with small forearms and good sized tris are considered two of the best pairs of arms ever. Forearms are a backstory.

Just like calves, I guess.

FOR REAL · « **Reply #103 on:** April 09, 2009, 07:36:26 PM »

Milos

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #104 on:** April 09, 2009, 07:39:48 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 09, 2009, 05:18:51 PM

Bucci Great biceps AND triceps

I believe I recall him having a small role in the final season of "Hunter", starring Fred Dryer years ago.

pumpster · « **Reply #105 on:** April 09, 2009, 07:55:35 PM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on April 09, 2009, 07:35:50 PM

Just like calves, I guess.

The majority of best arms in BB history don't include great forearms. Few care.

Emmortal · « **Reply #106 on:** April 09, 2009, 08:06:14 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on April 09, 2009, 05:18:51 PM

Bucci Great biceps AND triceps

Bucci had some really great peaked biceps. I remember seeing a shot of him on the beach with a parrot on his shoulder give a bicep shot, freaky peak.

Hulkster · « **Reply #107 on:** April 09, 2009, 08:07:21 PM »

99 ronnie pic showing his crazy arms

D_1000 · « **Reply #108 on:** April 09, 2009, 11:00:05 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on April 09, 2009, 04:36:04 PM

Danimal77 · « **Reply #109 on:** April 09, 2009, 11:03:55 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 09, 2009, 08:07:21 PM

99 ronnie pic showing his crazy arms

Yeah, but both guys on either side of him had much large biceps and if you don't see that you have your head so far up Ronnie's ass. Ronnie had great peak (a la Coe, Robinson, etc), but his actual biceps were tiny in comparison to the sheer volume of many other competitors.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #110 on:** April 09, 2009, 11:49:15 PM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on April 09, 2009, 11:03:55 PM

Yeah, but both guys on either side of him had much large biceps and if you don't see that you have your head so far up Ronnie's ass. Ronnie had great peak (a la Coe, Robinson, etc), but his actual biceps were tiny in comparison to the sheer volume of many other competitors.

i agree with you but most of bis with peaks are not so big!!.. Flex and chris had good biceps but nothing special, same as most of the other pros.. but because biceps with peaks are rare they are sepcial..

pumpster · « **Reply #111 on:** April 09, 2009, 11:58:18 PM »

Quote from: Danimal77 on April 09, 2009, 11:03:55 PM

Yeah, but both guys on either side of him had much large biceps and if you don't see that you have your head so far up Ronnie's ass. Ronnie had great peak (a la Coe, Robinson, etc), but his actual biceps were tiny in comparison to the sheer volume of many other competitors.

Seriously you're clueless. They're nowhere near "tiny". Your brain may be tiny to even think it.

As far as biceps size, there's not much difference between those guys in the pic you provided.

Meso_z · « **Reply #112 on:** April 10, 2009, 12:06:14 AM »

meechz · « **Reply #113 on:** April 10, 2009, 12:47:38 AM »

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/photo/data/2/paul_jean_guillaume.JPG

affeman · « **Reply #114 on:** April 10, 2009, 12:48:23 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 09, 2009, 03:37:16 PM

small biceps LOL

Actually Colemans biceps were tiny. Great splits no doubt, but not much beef on there.

THESE are huge biceps, this guy has really some muscles up there:

Meso_z · « **Reply #115 on:** April 10, 2009, 12:58:58 AM »

True. Ronnies ARMS overall were huge but bis alone were "small" but had an outstanding peak.

were talking about biceps here, not arms overall.

Meso_z · « **Reply #116 on:** April 10, 2009, 01:00:44 AM »

ANYONE HAS THW HOLE ARTICLE SCANNED?

gracie bjj · « **Reply #117 on:** April 10, 2009, 02:24:30 AM »

biceps id have to go with arnold,he had the most complete biceps imo, both part of his biceps where developed perfectly and fully imo

Pollux · « **Reply #118 on:** April 10, 2009, 04:38:29 AM »

Quote from: gracie bjj on April 10, 2009, 02:24:30 AM

biceps id have to go with arnold,he had the most complete biceps imo, both part of his biceps where developed perfectly and fully imo

Good boy.

lovemonkey · « **Reply #119 on:** April 10, 2009, 04:52:12 AM »

Quote from: Pollux on April 10, 2009, 04:38:29 AM

Good boy.

Arnold is numero dos.

affeman · « **Reply #120 on:** April 10, 2009, 05:08:31 AM »

Quote from: gracie bjj on April 10, 2009, 02:24:30 AM

biceps id have to go with arnold,he had the most complete biceps imo, both part of his biceps where developed perfectly and fully imo

ZERO details, ZERO. No vein, no striatons, smoot like ~~a baby ass~~ Jay Cutlers ass at the 2007 Olympia.

Meso_z · « **Reply #121 on:** April 10, 2009, 05:15:23 AM »

Quote from: affeman on April 10, 2009, 05:08:31 AM

ZERO details, ZERO. No vein, no striatons, smoot like ~~a baby ass~~ Jay Cutlers ass at the 2007 Olympia.

Arnold was overrated big time. Sucking Weiders cock probably did it for him.

donrhummy · « **Reply #122 on:** April 10, 2009, 08:03:23 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on April 09, 2009, 08:07:21 PM

99 ronnie pic showing his crazy arms

Think of how good Ronnie would have looked with Cormier's waist:

Lord Humungous · « **Reply #123 on:** April 10, 2009, 08:07:22 AM »

Both Kal and Scott had wicked biceps. Not a peaked as Arnies but much thicker and fuller.

kiwiol · « **Reply #124 on:** April 10, 2009, 08:08:37 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on April 10, 2009, 08:03:23 AM

Think of how good Ronnie would have looked with Cormier's waist:

Great chop - you've got skills, brah!