Using a book that was written by superstitious men proclaiming they know the exact words and intents of an invisible man sitting on a cloud?
Yeah.. that sounds like a really rational argument there.
Prove it isn't a choice first and then you might have a leg to stand on. In the meantime, continue to worship your "perfect" religious unicorn while criticizing his creations. Good job! You really showed the hypocrisy of religion right there.
So, in other words you don't know what the hell you are talking about. Yet, you feel the need to attack religion all the time. If you are going to talk about God, you need to know the foundation, the basis for the theological thought based on THE BIBLE.
Saying, "oh, it is just a book written by men" is not good enough. That's like me
arguing with someone about evolution but never opening a science book. How can I refute anything when I don't know my oponent's view and where they come from?
Prove is not from birth? Humans themselves prove that. There are people who have been married to the opposite sex or dating the opposite sex, and ALL OF THE SUDDEN they start dating the same sex. The difference is that you would consider that normal, but at the same time are incredulous when a gay man or lesbian after converting to God, state they are free from homosexuality and even marry persons of the opposite sex. NO, NO, NO!!!! For those who don't believe in God and are fags it's impossible to change your sexual preference. Yet, they don't blink an eye when a man who has been married for years, who has kids, decides to start taking it up the rear. No, that's not a choice he made. Of course not!!! That is what he always was since birth. Right? But, let anyone proclaim that God liberated them from such disgustingness and that person will be viewed as a liar or closet homo by this sinful world.
NOT EVEN SCIENCE HAS PROCLAIMED OR FOUND ANY EVIDENCE THAT IT IS FROM BIRTH, NOR THAT THERE IS SUCH A GENETIC GENE. IT IS A CHOICE!!!! So if science has not found any evidence to contradict what I am saying, other than measuring brain size and brain activity in certain lobes of the brain, what leg or rational argument are you standing on?