Author Topic: unreal/To Derek Anthony (Read 131105 times)

LuciusFox · « **Reply #525 on:** April 13, 2006, 07:21:46 AM »

Quote from: analcandy on April 13, 2006, 06:45:45 AM

Are those real?

$:-\$

drkaje · « **Reply #526 on:** April 13, 2006, 09:02:50 AM »

I'm gonna hope those are pics of some other balding guy and not Derek.

Why would he be here bragging about Hummers, aprartments, etc... with stuff like that around unless he were just plain advertising for clients?

analcandy · « **Reply #527 on:** April 13, 2006, 09:09:41 AM »

Quote from: drkaje on April 13, 2006, 09:02:50 AM

I'm gonna hope those are pics of some other balding guy and not Derek.

Why would he be here bragging about Hummers, aprartments, etc... with stuff like that around unless he were just plain advertising for clients?

just click the fucking link!

http://www.menmodelsandmuscles.com/anthony.htm

drkaje · « **Reply #528 on:** April 13, 2006, 09:12:31 AM »

Quote from: analcandy on April 13, 2006, 09:09:41 AM

just click the fucking link!

http://www.menmodelsandmuscles.com/anthony.htm

No!

I don't want to believe it, LOL!

Farkenell · « **Reply #529 on:** April 13, 2006, 09:16:34 AM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on April 09, 2006, 05:22:26 PM

Derek dwarfs you

for eternity, Derek has and always will dwarf you

buffalo · « **Reply #530 on:** April 13, 2006, 09:26:45 AM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on April 13, 2006, 07:21:46 AM

Are those real? $:-\$

the cry of a lovesick & heartbroken fan finally realizing his hero shakes his thang at a camera for gay geezers

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #531 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:24:58 PM »

Quote from: Dingleberry on April 13, 2006, 07:20:08 AM

How on earth could you feel good about yourself posing naked for some dude like that, much less the countless people who will see you nude on the internet. There's a bug difference between tasteful nude pictures and straight gay porn. This falls into the gay porn category. What a way to totally cheapen yourself. I wonder if his family has seen these? For their sake, I hope they never do.

that is not pornography...your mind is pornographic

Dingleberry · « **Reply #532 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:30:57 PM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on April 13, 2006, 12:24:58 PM

that is not pornography...your mind is pornographic

Pornography: Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

Owned: you

Any questions?

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #533 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:38:52 PM »

and what is sexually explicite about that picture

Dingleberry · « **Reply #534 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:41:29 PM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on April 13, 2006, 12:38:52 PM

and what is sexually explicite about that picture

You're joking right?

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #535 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:44:43 PM »

what is sexually explicite about derek anthony posing with a wig on naked before a camera man

LuciusFox · « **Reply #536 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:52:35 PM »

Quote from: Farkenell on April 13, 2006, 09:16:34 AM

for eternity, Derek has and always will dwarf you

The difference is that I'm ok with him dwarfing me, while you are heartbroken because of it.

Dingleberry · « **Reply #537 on:** April 13, 2006, 12:59:02 PM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on April 13, 2006, 12:44:43 PM

what is sexually explicite about derek anthony posing with a wig on naked before a camera man

ART vs PORN
If you don't understand the difference, there's not much I can do for you.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #538 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:20:31 PM »

Quote from: Dingleberry on April 13, 2006, 12:59:02 PM

ART vs PORN
If you don't understand the difference, there's not much I can do for you.

oh so naked pictures are pornographic LOL

Dingleberry · « **Reply #539 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:30:58 PM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on April 13, 2006, 01:20:31 PM

oh so naked pictures are pornographic LOL

Yes, if the primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal. Do you honesty believe those pictures are for anything else then sexual arousal?
I guess the website they came from is an "art" site, and I also guess Derrick posts his pics not to make money from homosexual men and some women, but merely to display his "masterpiece" in an artistic fashion.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #540 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:46:50 PM »

come on guys. can we take down the dick pictures. the point's been made and i don't like seeing a dick in my face every time i click here.

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #541 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:52:05 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on April 13, 2006, 01:46:50 PM

come on guys. can we take down the dick pictures. the point's been made and i don't like seeing a dick in my face every time i click here.

why, does it remind you too much of real life? hahahaha, sorry couldn't resist.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #542 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:53:01 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on April 13, 2006, 01:46:50 PM

come on guys. can we take down the dick pictures. the point's been made and i don't like seeing a dick in my face every time i click here.

it's just a body part to me. i dont see anything sexually explicite about it.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #543 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:55:58 PM »

well i do find it nasty. also i don't live by myself and i dont expect to see a schlong on the screen and there it is.

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #544 on:** April 13, 2006, 01:58:04 PM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on April 13, 2006, 01:53:01 PM

it's just a body part to me. i dont see anything sexually explicite about it.

So if some guy walked up to your wife/gf, pulled out his meat and tapped her on the shoulder with it, you wouldn't have a problem? Afterall, if it was a hand, you wouldn't care, right?

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #545 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:04:26 PM »

Quote from: The Showstoppa on April 13, 2006, 01:58:04 PM

So if some guy walked up to your wife/gf, pulled out his meat and tapped her on the shoulder with it, you wouldn't have a problem? Afterall, if it was a hand, you wouldn't care, right?

um no that would be lewd behavior and public exposure. a violation of public law.

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #546 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:06:29 PM »

Quote from: bigdumbbell on April 13, 2006, 02:04:26 PM

um no that would be lewd behavior and public exposure. a violation of public law.

Well, it should be a violation of law for Derek to be photographed at all, but...

FREAKgeek · « **Reply #547 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:13:21 PM »

Quote from: gibberj2 on April 13, 2006, 01:55:58 PM

well i do find it nasty. also i don't live by myself and i dont expect to see a schlong on the screen and there it is.

now we all have dick on our computer history, temporary files, cookies, etc. Windows finds a way to tuck and hide this shit forever. Then you get people over using your computer - some idiot discovers it and your labeled a fag.

The Showstoppa · « **Reply #548 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:14:47 PM »

Quote from: FREAKgeek on April 13, 2006, 02:13:21 PM

now we all have dick on our computer history, temporary files, cookies, etc. Windows finds a way to tuck and hide this shit forever. Then you get people over using your computer - some idiot discovers it and your labeled a fag.

That's the "excuse" that alexxx and Lucius use. "I was just visiting BB sites!"

LuciusFox · « **Reply #549 on:** April 13, 2006, 02:16:43 PM »

Quote from: The Showstoppa on April 13, 2006, 02:14:47 PM

That's the "excuse" that alexxx and Lucius use. "I was just visiting BB sites!"

It wouldn't be an excuse, it would be the truth. Your years of dishonesty have made it difficult for you to tell what the truth is.