The shoot sounds 100% legal. I've said that from minute one.
That being said,
"The source claims that there is "solid proof" that there was a struggle between Brown and Wilson for the policeman’s firearm, resulting in the gun going off"
It sounded like 6 bullets fired in rapid succession, one small target area, right arm to the head.
Guns that "go off" usually jam up. Even on the RARE occasion that they were fighting for a gun and somehow, one of their fingers pulled both parts of the glock trigger (what brand/model was cop carrying?)
Even if that happened, gun would jam up. Not "go off" 5 more times lol.
Shoot sounds legal, but gun "going off" during struggle sounds stupid. More like, COP feared for his life and legally fired upon Brown. It's this kind of shotty police work - bullshitting people to make themselves look innocent, even when a lie isn't neccessary - that leads to mistrust.
Shame on FOX news for the "insider", or "source", who stated the gun was just "going off". Doesn't make any sense. If this isn't a police officer telling them, they should clarify that. FOX is now carrying the water for the police dept, selling an accidental discharge narrative. Pathetic. Legal shoot, but that gun didn't go off" 6 times lol.