I did and your application of said fallacies was inappropriate as they were based upon your atheistic worldview. You simply fallacy shopped when our worldviews conflicted.
That was not what I outlined. I used “slapping” as an example of an offense. It’s the individual getting slapped that’s the crux. There will be different degrees of punishment for slapping different individuals.
From your atheistic worldview you deem my position about God an “assumption” and then apply the claim of logical fallacy.
My clumsy way of saying we break God’s law….God is infinite and so is his law.
We use anthropomorphic language to align divine attributes alongside human attributes. We attempt to make God more relatable and understandable to humanity.
I can lead you right to God, but you won’t follow.
Falconé did what he had to do with the wingspan of limited effort.
The caesarian way and style of meddling and improving things surely seemed like the true and may be ONLY resort for such an advantage.
The first "rider" (or should we say proponent?) engaged, and then the second, in this vile concoction of wills.
Apocalyptic or not, the true manifest was made, and it was clear, black baggery was a real effort as a means of settling it in a non-provokative manner without a dispute nor a premonition of strife and struggle.
They both knew where everything was heading as soon as they stepped inside the cage, it was a hellbound ride to the sauna...
The "mistique" is here to stay, be it now or never...
It's the Afterlife alright.
And yes, we should always (vis-a-vis) stay in the same boat among those other sordid predicaments where it may or may not flutter.
The one that tries, will, of course gain what is needed in this time and age.
The religion is one thing though, make no mistake about that.
It gets thought of many many times, always trying to improve.
