Author Topic: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?  (Read 24379 times)

EL Mariachi

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6019
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #50 on: June 27, 2007, 09:19:23 AM »
ha ha ha if this is real , then adonis is truly a master ;D

bebop396

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1461
  • Getbig!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #51 on: June 27, 2007, 09:43:36 AM »
Someone changed the pic to gustavo badell

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #52 on: June 27, 2007, 09:50:32 AM »
 ???

TooPowerful4u

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Getbig!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #53 on: June 27, 2007, 12:05:56 PM »
What company do you work with?  We can surely work out.  I wonder if you will be able to do the running portion of the training?   Can you run still?

Sprints or distance?  I can do a 2 mile run, but sprints are out of the question at 230lbs in the summer heat haha.  I work for Gaspari Nutrition, Trey is one of our sales reps and promotes the Junior USAs every year.  Great guy. I dont normally run in my workouts, as i am more concerned with bulking right now, and it would cut into my calories. 

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #54 on: June 27, 2007, 01:12:32 PM »
read my signature for my answer.

also the leafy bug is the natural idol!

gimmick account????
nasser=piece of shit

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #55 on: June 27, 2007, 04:41:30 PM »
Oh well, looks like TA's not hated that much on here after all...
Hrmmm

Special Ed

  • Toms
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4666
  • Special Ed Forever!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #56 on: June 27, 2007, 05:24:45 PM »
by this definition, are you a bodybuilder?
I am indeed. But don't hate me because I'm natural, supplement-free, with low testosterone levels and still crush you.
BigNationRadio.com

jason armstrong

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1193
  • Riverview Trailer Park St Louis MO
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #57 on: June 27, 2007, 06:42:21 PM »
lol you sure are a character.  Do you by any chance know Tres Bennett?  He is a sales rep for our company down in the Carolina's.  We gotta grab a workout sometime, i wonder if you are the same in person as you are on the boards.
he doesn't know anybody bro he got fired from his telemarketing job for being on getbig all day he's  ascared sad little 30 year old kid living at home with mama! he hides in his bedroom all day...
1

Wikidudeman

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 214
  • Nu mă, Nu mă iei!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #58 on: June 30, 2007, 04:35:31 PM »
Someone changed the pic to gustavo badell

Someone on MuscularDevelopment.com gave me the Gustavo picture to use since he took it and so I replaced the picture of "Trueadonis" and moved it to the middle of the article. I thought that would solve the whole controversy but I guess it didn't. Frankly I don't see the problem. The folks at Wikipedia like the image, We've explained why the image is relevant to the articles it's being used in, Yet anonymous vandals still come and erase the image citing previously refuted arguments.

Please don't vandalize wikipedia, If you believe the image doesn't belong there for reason relevant to wikipedia policy then make a user name, explain clearly why the image should be removed on the articles talk pages, gather a consensus, then the image will be removed. Attempting to vandalize the image or remove it without justification or to gather false consensus from a few users on this message board because you don't like the image for personal reasons won't get you anywhere. Wikipedia isn't a democracy and attempting to "vote" on it won't get it removed, You need to explain your reasons for wanting it to be removed and convince other editors at wikipedia, that's how wikipedia works.

The image is used on the following pages...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_abdomen
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscular_system
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_exercise
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeletal_muscle
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_fitness
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_tone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_fitness_training
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_hypertrophy

If you want the image removed from one or more of the pages then create a name for wikipedia, edit the talk pages of each article it is placed on by pressing the "+" button at the top, explain your reasoning with novel arguments that coincide with wikipedia policy, sign your name at the end by typing ~~~~. Remember, I'm just here to help, and if you have any valid reasons for the image being removed I want to hear them on wikipedia.



Thanks.

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16989
  • MAGA
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #59 on: June 30, 2007, 05:26:15 PM »
Wikidude isn't it funny that you have the same intrests listed as TA has.

Evolution , Carl Sagan, Bodybuilding etc.

You can stop pretending now we all know Wiki is you TA

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #60 on: June 30, 2007, 05:29:16 PM »
Wikidude isn't it funny that you have the same intrests listed as TA has.

Evolution , Carl Sagan, Bodybuilding etc.

You can stop pretending now we all know Wiki is you TA
Enlightened minds tend to think alike.

Undercover Supp Guy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #61 on: June 30, 2007, 05:34:22 PM »
Good job Adam, getting in Wikipedia is today's version of getting on TV or in the newspaper..

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #62 on: June 30, 2007, 05:37:04 PM »
Good job Adam, getting in Wikipedia is today's version of getting on TV or in the newspaper..
No problem my friend!

I had the number 3 video on Youtube for a while also!

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #63 on: June 30, 2007, 06:06:09 PM »
No problem my friend!

I had the number 3 video on Youtube for a while also!

You do realize that while many people know who you are and are somewhat amused by your delusional antics, not a single person respects you or would want to be you, right?   You are the white Vince Goodrum.   ::)
Ron: "I am lazy."

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #64 on: June 30, 2007, 06:38:24 PM »
Oh well, looks like TA's not hated that much on here after all...

No one hates TA. We just feel sorry for him cause he's stuck with that face ;D

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57790
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #65 on: June 30, 2007, 06:40:39 PM »
Oh well, looks like TA's not hated that much on here after all...
heh, I wouldn't go that far. He may be tolerated, but I wouldn't say he's liked ;)
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #66 on: June 30, 2007, 06:43:45 PM »
heh, I wouldn't go that far. He may be tolerated, but I wouldn't say he's liked ;)


He's kinda like the class retard.  Nobody really hates him per se, but nobody actually likes him either, and he usually annoys the fucck out of most people.
Ron: "I am lazy."

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57790
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #67 on: June 30, 2007, 06:45:26 PM »

He's kinda like the class retard.  Nobody really hates him per se, but nobody actually likes him either, and he usually annoys the fucck out of most people.
exactly, he always takes the opposite of a popular opinon and argues his side until the death, no matter how stupid he looks, continuously. It's amusing and sad at the same time :'(






more amusing though :D
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

onlyme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19328
  • Don't Fuck With Bears
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #68 on: June 30, 2007, 09:18:25 PM »
Wikidude isn't it funny that you have the same intrests listed as TA has.

Evolution , Carl Sagan, Bodybuilding etc.

You can stop pretending now we all know Wiki is you TA

True

No one hates TA. We just feel sorry for him cause he's stuck with that face ;D

True

You do realize that while many people know who you are and are somewhat amused by your delusional antics, not a single person respects you or would want to be you, right?   You are the white Vince Goodrum.   ::)

True


He's kinda like the class retard.  Nobody really hates him per se, but nobody actually likes him either, and he usually annoys the fucck out of most people.

True

exactly, he always takes the opposite of a popular opinon and argues his side until the death, no matter how stupid he looks, continuously. It's amusing and sad at the same time :'(






more amusing though :D

True

And yes he is this Wiki guy or it is his girlfriend.  He spends 80% of his day on the Internet trying to be someone. 

G o a t b o y

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 21431
  • Time-Out in Dubai, India with Swampi the Cocksmith
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #69 on: June 30, 2007, 09:25:03 PM »
  He spends 80% of his day on the Internet trying to be someone. 

Maybe we should hook him up with BCH...   she spends most of her time "trying to be someone" as well.  The two of them seem to have a lot in common.
Ron: "I am lazy."

jason armstrong

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1193
  • Riverview Trailer Park St Louis MO
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #70 on: July 01, 2007, 06:54:20 AM »
Enlightened minds tend to think alike.
Looks like you're gearing up for another big run of your bullshit hate and anti-bodybuilding propoganda. Adam, if you're still under 170 pounds at your height, nothing's gonna have changed. Nobody's gonna give a shit, no matter how lean, or how unconventional your methods. End of story.

I'm guessing that once you do achieve the most awe-inspiring, functional and universally-appreciable physiques on the planet, that you will stop saying negative things about people on the internet on a perpetual basis. Your behavior is never seen among the truly successful.

I wanna ask you, Adam...what price would be too much to pay for that accomplishment? Of having built the most admired physique on the planet? Living to 70 instead of 90 or 100? "Risk" of incarceration? People suspecting that you achieved that physique the "easy," or according to them, "immoral" way? What if steroids or diet/training techniques that you do not currently employ were actually the "only" way to achieve what you are ultimately wanting to achieve? Would you be willing to do "what it takes" then, without the ability to claim any of the methods involved as being of your own unique conception? Would having the best physique on the planet be enough to make you feel special or appreciated? Or could it be that you don't truly believe you have the genetics to create the true physique of your dreams, and that you feel you'll need to produce your best presentation whose shortcomings will be excused because of it's being "pretty good, considering?" For example, "considering" that you didn't really even try. "Considering" that you ate whatever you wanted to. "Considering" that you did no cardio. "Considering" that you didn't even eat protein, much less take steroids. "Considering" that you don't even care about bodybuilding anyway.

Could this be your motivation here? Lately you've tried to explain that you are only motivated to "help" because of your "care" for these people. I want you to ask yourself how "helping" these people could ever be considered enabling them to do something that they, by definition, needed you to be able to achieve, when you will not have indicated that you needed THEM for any part of your existence, other than the praise they stand to offer you, on account of what would then be perceived by them as your superiority to them. You are only seeking to "help" yourself. No one wants to achieve anything they don't suspect they could have ultimately figured out on their own, regardless of how much your "help" stands to improve the quality of their lives. They must be able to assume themselves in some way responsible for their own success.

Show some humility. Show some vulnerability. Show that you're fallible. Admit mistakes. Acknowledge defeat. Where's the deadlift video? Just say that you thought you could do it but couldn't. We'll understand. Your having approximated your abilities incorrectly does not mean that you are a failure. But we're going to assume that until you just say you were wrong on issues such as this one, that you yourself do innately believe yourself to be a failure and have an very self-limiting inability to consciously face that you may have been prone to error. It shows a blatant inability to be true to YOURSELF and for that reason no one is able to trust your competency. This is universal law. Hitler had this same inability. In the end, he killed himself rather than face that he may have been wrong in some of his fundamental-most assumptions, and in denial of this, he waged war with the world until the bitter end, took many innocent lives, and hurt many of the survivors in unspeakable ways in the process. The world was vulnerable to this at the time because it hadn't seen someone appear so sure of himself to that extent and be wrong before. We now know that insanity has no boundaries and your ego, like Hitler's, knows no boundaries. I believe that you would destroy us all before admitting that you were anything but the most superior individual on the planet. Look how you left Tweeter hanging. When you're wrong, you just disappear until you think we've forgotten. Thank God most of us have the sense enough not to listen to you. You are a hateful, selfish, jealous person and you are a festering sore on the sport of bodybuilding.

Until you've learned better how to "play the game," Adam, just go away. Please. You are not concerned for anyone's health, or the betterment of society. You attack people here because they make you feel inferior, and your posts here simply reinforce the legitimacy of the notion that you indeed are. Recognize that nothing truly great has ever been achieved in strict compliance with the stated moral values of a society, but rather by guidance of the much more trustworthy and heartfelt moral compass held personally by the greats having achieved these feats worthy of mention and demanding of our most genuine appreciation.

Meldown, hope this helps, I'm just saying, etc. I just hope you'll consider some of this and STFU until you've got something positive to say.
1

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #71 on: July 01, 2007, 07:41:12 AM »
True

True

True

True

True

And yes he is this Wiki guy or it is his girlfriend.  He spends 80% of his day on the Internet trying to be someone. 

Still training hard, Onlymen? 8)

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #72 on: July 01, 2007, 07:44:15 AM »
Looks like you're gearing up for another big run of your bullshit hate and anti-bodybuilding propoganda. Adam, if you're still under 170 pounds at your height, nothing's gonna have changed. Nobody's gonna give a shit, no matter how lean, or how unconventional your methods. End of story.

I'm guessing that once you do achieve the most awe-inspiring, functional and universally-appreciable physiques on the planet, that you will stop saying negative things about people on the internet on a perpetual basis. Your behavior is never seen among the truly successful.

I wanna ask you, Adam...what price would be too much to pay for that accomplishment? Of having built the most admired physique on the planet? Living to 70 instead of 90 or 100? "Risk" of incarceration? People suspecting that you achieved that physique the "easy," or according to them, "immoral" way? What if steroids or diet/training techniques that you do not currently employ were actually the "only" way to achieve what you are ultimately wanting to achieve? Would you be willing to do "what it takes" then, without the ability to claim any of the methods involved as being of your own unique conception? Would having the best physique on the planet be enough to make you feel special or appreciated? Or could it be that you don't truly believe you have the genetics to create the true physique of your dreams, and that you feel you'll need to produce your best presentation whose shortcomings will be excused because of it's being "pretty good, considering?" For example, "considering" that you didn't really even try. "Considering" that you ate whatever you wanted to. "Considering" that you did no cardio. "Considering" that you didn't even eat protein, much less take steroids. "Considering" that you don't even care about bodybuilding anyway.

Could this be your motivation here? Lately you've tried to explain that you are only motivated to "help" because of your "care" for these people. I want you to ask yourself how "helping" these people could ever be considered enabling them to do something that they, by definition, needed you to be able to achieve, when you will not have indicated that you needed THEM for any part of your existence, other than the praise they stand to offer you, on account of what would then be perceived by them as your superiority to them. You are only seeking to "help" yourself. No one wants to achieve anything they don't suspect they could have ultimately figured out on their own, regardless of how much your "help" stands to improve the quality of their lives. They must be able to assume themselves in some way responsible for their own success.

Show some humility. Show some vulnerability. Show that you're fallible. Admit mistakes. Acknowledge defeat. Where's the deadlift video? Just say that you thought you could do it but couldn't. We'll understand. Your having approximated your abilities incorrectly does not mean that you are a failure. But we're going to assume that until you just say you were wrong on issues such as this one, that you yourself do innately believe yourself to be a failure and have an very self-limiting inability to consciously face that you may have been prone to error. It shows a blatant inability to be true to YOURSELF and for that reason no one is able to trust your competency. This is universal law. Hitler had this same inability. In the end, he killed himself rather than face that he may have been wrong in some of his fundamental-most assumptions, and in denial of this, he waged war with the world until the bitter end, took many innocent lives, and hurt many of the survivors in unspeakable ways in the process. The world was vulnerable to this at the time because it hadn't seen someone appear so sure of himself to that extent and be wrong before. We now know that insanity has no boundaries and your ego, like Hitler's, knows no boundaries. I believe that you would destroy us all before admitting that you were anything but the most superior individual on the planet. Look how you left Tweeter hanging. When you're wrong, you just disappear until you think we've forgotten. Thank God most of us have the sense enough not to listen to you. You are a hateful, selfish, jealous person and you are a festering sore on the sport of bodybuilding.

Until you've learned better how to "play the game," Adam, just go away. Please. You are not concerned for anyone's health, or the betterment of society. You attack people here because they make you feel inferior, and your posts here simply reinforce the legitimacy of the notion that you indeed are. Recognize that nothing truly great has ever been achieved in strict compliance with the stated moral values of a society, but rather by guidance of the much more trustworthy and heartfelt moral compass held personally by the greats having achieved these feats worthy of mention and demanding of our most genuine appreciation.

Meldown, hope this helps, I'm just saying, etc. I just hope you'll consider some of this and STFU until you've got something positive to say.


Are you saying you like the penis, 'Jason Armstrong'?

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #73 on: July 01, 2007, 10:42:37 AM »
Still training hard, Onlymen? 8)
LOL. Jabba doin' the hammer curls. Nice work, Kiwi. :D

/gotta post this down in the alphabets in that best pics thread, tho. afterall, it's for posterity.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #74 on: July 01, 2007, 11:06:50 AM »
LOL. Jabba doin' the hammer curls. Nice work, Kiwi. :D

/gotta post this down in the alphabets in that best pics thread, tho. afterall, it's for posterity.

I don't know photoshop dude. It's Knny187's artwork. The man's a legend 8)