Author Topic: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?  (Read 24253 times)

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« on: June 26, 2007, 01:11:02 PM »
Should we let this guy get away with having his pictures (possibly) immortalised on Wikipedia?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nbodybuilder.jpg

The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):

    * Human abdomen
    * Bodybuilding
    * Muscle
    * Muscular system
    * Physical exercise
    * Skeletal muscle
    * Physical fitness
    * Striation
    * Muscle tone
    * General fitness training
    * Muscle hypertrophy

I vote: NO

Hrmmm

xpac2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1242
  • Getbig!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #1 on: June 26, 2007, 01:12:30 PM »
NO

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #2 on: June 26, 2007, 01:14:15 PM »
Yes he personifies modern bodybuilding. 8)

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2007, 01:15:36 PM »
I actually think it's funny as fcuk and fair play to Adonis for getting in there and hijacking it all.

If it bothers you so much, why don't you alter the pictures? I thought that's what Wikipedia was for?

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2007, 01:16:39 PM »
I actually think it's funny as fcuk and fair play to Adonis for getting in there and hijacking it all.

If it bothers you so much, why don't you alter the pictures? I thought that's what Wikipedia was for?

Hes an editor on there, or whateva you call it.

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2007, 01:17:34 PM »
I agree no. But I tried removing it (with explanation) and wikidudeman put it back up and said it belonged. Personally I think he's TA but if enough people complain, they'll eventually come down.

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2007, 01:18:45 PM »
Early bird gets the worm.

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2007, 01:19:17 PM »
I agree no. But I tried removing it (with explanation) and wikidudeman put it back up and said it belonged. Personally I think he's TA but if enough people complain, they'll eventually come down.

if we can get enough people in this thread together saying they want it removed we can organise getting his image removed from Wikipedia.
Hrmmm

TooPowerful4u

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1141
  • Getbig!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #8 on: June 26, 2007, 01:25:28 PM »
Well it depends...he is not a bodybuilder unless he steps on stage and competes... im not talking about the few guys on getbig, that contest is a joke.  He doesnt need to be a champion, just compete.  Either that, or put up a real competitive bodybuilder's picture

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #9 on: June 26, 2007, 01:25:59 PM »
if we can get enough people in this thread together saying they want it removed we can organise getting his image removed from Wikipedia.
Why do you give a shit, 'climber' ::)

Is it because he has achieved more in bodybuilding than you could in a million lifetimes?

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #10 on: June 26, 2007, 01:28:41 PM »
Is it because he has achieved more in bodybuilding than you could in a million lifetimes?

I'm not a (competitive) bodybuilder and never will be. It doesn't interest me. And, if he has never competed then he has not achieved a single thing in bodybuilding. I'm doing this because he has bad character.
Hrmmm

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #11 on: June 26, 2007, 01:30:09 PM »
Well it depends...he is not a bodybuilder unless he steps on stage and competes... im not talking about the few guys on getbig, that contest is a joke.  He doesnt need to be a champion, just compete.  Either that, or put up a real competitive bodybuilder's picture

He has more recognition than you,

what does that say about your place in the hardcore bodybuilding fraternity?


UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #12 on: June 26, 2007, 01:34:12 PM »
I'm not a (competitive) bodybuilder and never will be. It doesn't interest me. And, if he has not ever competed then he has not achieved a single thing in bodybuilding. I'm doing this because he has bad character.
Why does he have a "bad character?" His only flaw is the occasional white lie; its not like he sells crack or beats women.


Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #13 on: June 26, 2007, 01:38:37 PM »
TA asked to have his picture on wikipedia then later spoke as if he had no idea how it got there.  TA has proven himself to be a liar which hurts his credibility and wikipedia should not be posting pictures of people just because they ask - their credibility is hurt by that too.
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #14 on: June 26, 2007, 01:42:13 PM »
Should we let this guy get away with having his pictures (possibly) immortalised on Wikipedia?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nbodybuilder.jpg
The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):
    * Human abdomen
    * Bodybuilding
    * Muscle
    * Muscular system
    * Physical exercise
    * Skeletal muscle
    * Physical fitness
    * Striation
    * Muscle tone
    * General fitness training
    * Muscle hypertrophy
*Lord of the Rings - Gollum
I vote: NO



Fixed.
Z

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2007, 01:43:37 PM »
TA asked to have his picture on wikipedia then later spoke as if he had no idea how it got there.  TA has proven himself to be a liar which hurts his credibility and wikipedia should not be posting pictures of people just because they ask - their credibility is hurt by that too.

TA doesn't lie, he stretches the truth. 8)

The_Leafy_Bug

  • Guest
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #16 on: June 26, 2007, 01:44:14 PM »
Should we let this guy get away with having his pictures (possibly) immortalised on Wikipedia?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Nbodybuilder.jpg
The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed):
    * Human abdomen
    * Bodybuilding
    * Muscle
    * Muscular system
    * Physical exercise
    * Skeletal muscle
    * Physical fitness
    * Striation
    * Muscle tone
    * General fitness training
    * Muscle hypertrophy

I vote: NO


Epic jealousy

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #17 on: June 26, 2007, 01:52:20 PM »
I had to look up what Wikipedia has to say about me:

"Bluto is a large, bearded,, musclebound man. He mostly uses his physical brawn to accomplish what he is trying to do, but does display some ability for tactical planning. Neither Popeye and Olive Oyl, nor any other characters, think of him as anything more than a worthless scoundrel"

 ;D
Z

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #18 on: June 26, 2007, 01:52:32 PM »
Epic jealousy


There is no jealousy here. I, and a lot of others, just believe that there is definitely someone out there who deserves the honour of being on Wikipedia a lot more than The True Adonis does.
Hrmmm

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16942
  • MAGA
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #19 on: June 26, 2007, 01:52:50 PM »
it says "bodybuilder Adam Abeles posing"

dude has never competed in bodybuilding.

but. he did a pretty good jobb on the information on bodybuilding, history etc. so if nobody else wants to do it i guess we will have to settle for having him on there lol

The_Leafy_Bug

  • Guest
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #20 on: June 26, 2007, 02:00:24 PM »
There is no jealousy here. I, and a lot of others, just believe that there is definitely someone out there who deserves the honour of being on Wikipedia a lot more than The True Adonis does.
Would you suggest we put up someone with a shaved head, goatee, and gh gut with obvious signs of steroid abuse?

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #21 on: June 26, 2007, 02:03:50 PM »
I actually think it's funny as fcuk and fair play to Adonis for getting in there and hijacking it all.

If it bothers you so much, why don't you alter the pictures? I thought that's what Wikipedia was for?
LOL. I absolutely agree. He's crazy allright. Too bad he can't use his lunacy for good. He'll probably crash wikipedia one of these days with his meddling. 

climber

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #22 on: June 26, 2007, 02:04:18 PM »
Would you suggest we put up someone with a shaved head, goatee, and gh gut with obvious signs of steroid abuse?

Why not? Someone respected with (mainstream) name recognition would be good.
Hrmmm

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #23 on: June 26, 2007, 02:04:53 PM »
Who cares?

Special Ed

  • Toms
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4666
  • Special Ed Forever!
Re: TA on wikipedia... should we allow it?
« Reply #24 on: June 26, 2007, 02:05:02 PM »
I have no objection to it. Adam obviously lifts and diets and that makes him a bodybuilder. Bodybuilders are not defined by competition. Adam's hustle got him the wikipedia gig and for that reason he deserves it. Life is what you make of it. I don't see any Pro Bodybuilders clamoring to have their photo on the wikipedia 'steroids' page.
BigNationRadio.com