Author Topic: The Iran attack is ON... (Read 4905 times)

240 is Back · « **Reply #50 on:** October 15, 2007, 06:55:50 PM »

Quote from: Trapezkerl on October 15, 2007, 06:51:01 PM

We wouldn't need to do all this bullshit if we had developed alternative fuels/energy, stopped spending a trillion a year on military bases and lived within our means...

oil/energy is secondary. only a spoke in wheel that is economy.

the economy is first.

I readily admit we're unable to compete anymore. Indians (tech) and chinese (mnfg) just work too hard for too little. until you can fix that problem and bring USA back to forefront in global market with some sustainable advantage, the neocon plan is the way to go.

if there's a better way, share it!

2ND COMING · « **Reply #51 on:** October 15, 2007, 06:57:16 PM »

Quote from: headhuntersix on October 15, 2007, 06:49:45 PM

What weapons...we didn't sell him chemicals..that was all bullshit. He got some support during the 9 year war with Iran. Most of his military was Russian made and trained. U can't fight with Russian equipment without using Soviet doctrine and a lifeline to spare parts. We provide weapons to anybody who fights are enemies, sometimes the game changes. We diodn't go into Iraq because we wanted our M-16's back.

don't play dumb here man, we sold WEAPONS FOR OIL to iraq when hussein was in charge, he in turn used them to terrorize his own country,

now tell me whats more justifiable, selling weapons to hezbollah, to fight off an invading israel, or selling weapons for oil/

................

headhuntersix · « **Reply #52 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:01:25 PM »

Maybe we should allow all those countries in Latin America and Africa to sink without our hand outs. Then we could pay for our military, which by the way sponsors ur continued freedom. No need to thank me.

How do we support Syria? Further the chem thing...
The USA did not sell Chemical (or any) Weapons to Saddam. A US agency did by mistake send anthrax (a biological weapon) to Iraq under the auspicies of a UN agricultural program. The chemical factories (dual use factories I believe) that Sadam got were from France and Germany.I believe it was the US who brought Halabja to international attention by denounceing Saddams use of chemical weapons. Saddams Mukhaburat, I believe tried to turn this into a Iranian erradication program; whoops sorry (I don't think they were ever able to actually use the stuff in combat anyhow). They had technical help from Europe or the Soviets.

headhuntersix · « **Reply #53 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:02:50 PM »

What weapons.....document what we sold to him. And who cares at this point. Hez is a terror organization who threats our allies and has killed our countrymen. Thats the issue.

240 is Back · « **Reply #54 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:04:09 PM »

damn... politics is some boring shit lol...

Giants are winning 21-10 over atlanta, almost halftime.

2ND COMING · « **Reply #55 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:04:36 PM »

Quote from: headhuntersix on October 15, 2007, 07:02:50 PM

What weapons.....document what we sold to him. And who cares at this point. Hez is a terror organization who threats our allies and has killed our countrymen. Thats the issue.

haha spoken like a true neo con, 110% bullshi

headhuntersix · « **Reply #56 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:05:16 PM »

Indians are over my Sox 4-2.

2ND COMING · « **Reply #57 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:05:45 PM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on October 15, 2007, 07:04:09 PM

damn... politics is some boring shit lol...

Giants are winning 21-10 over atlanta, almost halftime.

i have it on espn right now, but we both know atl does NOT stand a chance

headhuntersix · « **Reply #58 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:07:26 PM »

Ok bud..whats bullshit...throwing the neocon lable doesn't work with me. ask anybody here. What weapons. Either we sent him vats of chems or we didn't. What hardware. Iran had more American hardware then the Iraqi's did.

headhuntersix · « **Reply #59 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:08:36 PM »

alright i have to go back to torturing iraqi children, i'll see u guys in the morning.

240 is Back · « **Reply #60 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:10:11 PM »

Quote from: headhuntersix on October 15, 2007, 07:07:26 PM

Ok bud..whats bullshit...throwing the neocon lable doesn't work with me.

HH6 is a global realist, from what I gather.

he knows the war is about
1) securing oil
2) securing bases for longterm us interests.

he might know that 911 has some fishyness, but can't comment due to being a military man.

(correct me if I"m wrong on anything, HH6)

2ND COMING · « **Reply #61 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:22:07 PM »

Quote from: headhuntersix on October 15, 2007, 07:07:26 PM

Ok bud..whats bullshit...throwing the neocon lable doesn't work with me. ask anybody here. What weapons. Either we sent him vats of chems or we didn't. What hardware. Iran had more American hardware then the Iraqi's did.

it's simple bud, TERROR , you use it as a scape for your agenda. yea hezbollah are ''terrorists'' who threaten our way of life, blah blah they have killed our countrymen, they live for the death of usa, come on, thats so 2002

now WHY would hezbollah threaten our allies? MAYBE BECAUSE IsRAEL INVADED LEBANON WITH NO DECLARATION OF SHIT, NO JUSTIFICATION ECTETERA. hezbollah has a right to threaten israel. israel and lebanon/palestine have been at it forever. And this is what you call it, '' THEY THREATEN OUR ALLIES'' HAHA!!!!!!!!!!

Al-Gebra · « **Reply #62 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:29:28 PM »

Quote from: 2ND COMING on October 15, 2007, 07:22:07 PM

it's simple bud, TERROR , you use it as a scape for your agenda. yea hezbollah are ''terrorists'' who threaten our way of life, blah blah they have killed our countrymen, they live for the death of usa, come on, thats so 2002

now WHY would hezbollah threaten our allies? MAYBE BECAUSE IsRAEL INVADED LEBANON WITH NO DECLARATION OF SHIT, NO JUSTIFICATION ECTETERA. hezbollah has a right to threaten israel. israel and lebanon/palestine have been at it forever. And this is what you call it, '' THEY THREATEN OUR ALLIES'' HAHA!!!!!!!!!!

what country are you from?

Al-Gebra · « **Reply #63 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:40:40 PM »

where'd 2nd coming go?

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #64 on:** October 15, 2007, 07:59:47 PM »

Quote from: JBGRAY on October 15, 2007, 05:22:09 PM

I highly doubt Israel would have our backs absolutely in any sort of attack. I can see them worming their way into an alliance with another nation in order to get another "pet attack dog" if they could see it as being advantageous. Israel would not do half of what it has been doing if it didn't have the 100% unquestioned backing of the US and I think many of Israel's policies do its citizenry a great disservice. Afterall, it IS the normal citizens that are most at risk from suicide bombers, assaults, and violent anti-semitism. I always thought an alliance between nations were supposed to have mutual benefits to each other, or at least an alliance based generally upon shared values, culture, and religion. Whatever advantages an alliance with Israel has given us, it certainly is lopsided comparitively to what the US has been to Israel. As for the shared backgrounds I would think we have more in common with the UK, Germany, France, Spain, and Australia. I guess the Israeli lobbying machine, the Israel-first politicians in our government, and the power of the Evangelical lobby is simply too much to overcome.

beat me to it. another golden post from JBGRAY

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #65 on:** October 15, 2007, 09:34:12 PM »

SNAP!!! SEE!!! Here comes a coalition attempt which was exactly what was happening the last time the words "Palestinian State" left the lips of an Administration official.

"With a government of that nature, only a united front of nations will be able to exert enough pressure to make Iran abandon its nuclear aspirations — a source of great anxiety and instability in the region,"--Gates

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071016/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/gates_iran

hmmmm.... can we afford another round of bribing nations to join in???