Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on October 17, 2006, 10:55:23 PM

Title: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on October 17, 2006, 10:55:23 PM
You guys can go at it on the vet records, IED, and all that here.

no more spaming multiple threads a day on this.
Title: Re: Obama Honors Fallen Soldiers
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 03, 2009, 03:04:01 PM
(CBS/ AP)  President Barack Obama made a midnight dash to this air base Wednesday to honor the return of fallen soldiers,  absorbing the ultimate cost of war as the United States endures its deadliest month of the Afghanistan campaign.

On a clear fall night, Mr. Obama flew by Marine One helicopter to Dover Air Force Base to greet the flag-draped cases of 18 Americans killed in action this week.

After landing, the president, wearing a dark topcoat, got into a motorcade to a base chapel, where he met privately with families of the fallen Americans. He had arrived on the base at 12:34 a.m. Thursday and returned to the White House before dawn.

Mr. Obama was taking part in a solemn process, to unfold in four movements: the transfer of the fallen 15 soldiers and three Drug Enforcement Agency agents from the back of the C-17 to a transport vehicle to a base mortuary.

As part of the official party, Mr. Obama was to go on the plane, each time witnessing silently as a chaplain said a prayer for the fallen, the family, the country and the war effort.

A president of two inherited wars, Mr. Obama is winding down U.S. involvement in Iraq, but the troubled war in Afghanistan is only widening. His dramatic visit to witness remains of the fallen comes as he weighs whether to send more troops into the Afghan war zone.  
Mr. Obama meets tomorrow with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and other military leaders as he weighs whether to send more troops into the war zone, reports CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante.

The White House kept Mr. Obama's plans off his schedule, informing a small group of traveling reporters in advance on condition of secrecy.

The Pentagon this year lifted its 18-year ban on media covering the return of U.S. service members killed in action if family permission is provided. With Mr. Obama in attendance, the media were to witness the transfer of one fallen soldier: Sgt. Dale R. Griffin of Terre Haute, Ind.

The flag-draped remains of Griffin were to be carried off the plane by six Army soldiers in fatigues and black berets. The transfer case then was being placed in a vehicle to be taken to the mortuary facility on the base.

The rest of the solemn morning was kept out of sight of the press on family wishes.

The Dover base, about 100 miles from the White House, is the entry point for service personnel killed overseas.

Mr. Obama's predecessor, President George W. Bush, visited the families of hundreds of fallen soldiers but did not attend any military funerals or go to Dover to receive the coffins.


-------------------------------------

President Obama shows Class and Respect for the fallen where Chickenhawk Bush could not !!

I'm confused mons - you clearly said you wanted to see 50,000 dead soldiers and now you seem sad about their deaths.  What gives?
Title: Re: Palin goes
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 07, 2009, 02:47:26 PM
"Rogue"  describes Palin perfectly !!

And Traitor/Benedict Arnold/POFS/ describes you.

Do you want me to post your post again where you said you want 50,000 soldiers killed by IED?   
Title: Re: Palin goes
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 07, 2009, 04:54:40 PM
Your dumb, ignorant, traitorous, disgusting, toxic, ass probably does not even realize how that phrase came about in the first place.

I wouldnt expect a traitor POFS like yourself to actually know why that title was chosen in the first place since you asre too busy posting bs about how you wanted 50,000 soldiers to die via IED's.

Where do you live you POFS?   
Title: Re: Palin goes
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 07:37:17 AM

$arah the Cu*t, deserves a GetBig *Bump*!

AND YOU ARE A TRAITOROUS BENEDICT ARNOLD POFS WHO SAID YOU WANT 50,000 AMERICAN SOLDIERS TO DIE VIA IED ATTACK. 

Title: Re: Palin goes
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 08:09:44 AM
AND YOU ARE A TRAITOROUS BENEDICT ARNOLD POFS WHO SAID YOU WANT 50,000 AMERICAN SOLDIERS TO DIE VIA IED ATTACK.   
Title: Re: Democrats - Your Era of blaming Bush for fiscal mismanagement is OVER!
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 09:03:27 AM
Look assmonkey..nobody cares about the opinion of a 14 year old lying sack of pus..go kill urself.
Title: Re: NeoCons LOSE again !!
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 09:08:45 AM
Oh and good job Mons on tying healthcare to the neocon agenda...neither of which are even remotely connected...but u keep reading the Daily Kos or whatever lib playbook site u read. Now go post ur 214 u lying piece of shit.
Title: Re: Palin goes
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 09:10:16 AM
Where's u 214 Mons. In this climate of internet threats and nuts like Hasan...I think I'll send ur past post forward on the IED thing. U never served u pussy....HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ow go kill urself.
Title: Re: NeoCons LOSE again !!
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 09:11:29 AM
Whats it like to spend 5 years in a Federal Pen getting raped by 10 black guys...post ur 214 and u will find out. Ur a pussy..post ur shit Ranger...post it. U said it..u back it up tough guy.
Title: Re: Palin goes
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 09:13:37 AM
Nobody cares..214 shitbag...airborne wings and orders...something.
Title: Re: NeoCons LOSE again !!
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 10:07:00 AM
This.

The term is used seamlessly with Republican/Conservative when it's not the case.  But, it's to be expected from someone whose depth and understanding of these situations is surface level at best.

Politics aside, Mons does nothing but troll, and the mods should do something about it.





I thought they did after he said he wanted 50,000 US Soldiers to die via IED attack, but I was wrong.  The mods should have banned him for that.
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 11:43:39 AM
Venus admits he's fully of shit and never served and then hoped more of our service men die in IED attacks...when u agree with Mons..u agree with that as well. Mons is a piece of shit wannbe ex soldier.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 11:44:55 AM
^^^^You're wrong EVERYTIME and it feels sooooooooooooooooooo good! :-*


And u can't back up ur record and hope more of our soldiers die in IED attacks...ur a piece of shit who wants a free hand out.
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 11:45:33 AM
Venus admits he's fully of shit and never served and then hoped more of our service men die in IED attacks...when u agree with Mons..u agree with that as well. Mons is a piece of shit wannbe ex soldier.

I wish I knew where Mons lived and would travel there to personally deliver him the beatdown he never had because he was probably born to a crackhead whore on welfare.

 
Title: Re: Unemployment Rate 10.2%, Highest Since April 1983
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 11:46:14 AM
Hey..go hang urslef. Why do u care..as long as u get ur free shit.
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 11:47:20 AM
I want him to post his shit so some of the guys on the major milblogs can verify he's full of shit and  go after him on criminal charges..like they have a bunch of times before.
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 11:48:34 AM
I want him to post his shit so some of the guys on the major milblogs can verify he's full of shit and  go after him on criminal charges..like they have a bunch of times before.

He wont because he is a coward and knee-padding POFS.
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: Skip8282 on November 08, 2009, 12:03:04 PM
Mons is a piece of shit. wannbe ex soldier.


Sorry HH6, just had to fix your post there.   8)
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 12:48:34 PM
 ::)  ::)  ::)

Where are you war files Mons? 
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 01:17:41 PM
Anytime man....Go pats!!!
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 01:20:15 PM
Nopoe all DOUCHEBAGS like u. Die in a fire shitbag.


That's pretty low even by your standards.



Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 01:24:56 PM
Nopoe all DOUCHEBAGS like u. Die in a fire shitbag.  


If I said I hope YOU and your FRIENDS die fighting George W Bush's illegal War....how would you feel?

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 08, 2009, 01:29:19 PM

If I said I hope YOU and your FRIENDS die fighting George W Bush's illegal War....how would you feel?




Uh, you did say that.  That's why he thinks so little of you.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 01:34:28 PM
Nopoe all DOUCHEBAGS like u.


Die in a fire shitbag.



Karma sucks  ;)
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 01:55:16 PM
Nopoe all DOUCHEBAGS like u. Die in a fire shitbag.  

Hey 33333333's,,,,, THIS is your buddy?


Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 01:58:56 PM
Hey 33333333's,,,,, THIS is your buddy?




My Buddy HH6 defends this country.  You mock it and make a joke of it.  You wish for our soldiers to be killed via IED attack.     

   
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 02:01:45 PM
^^^^^

 Die in a fire shitbag.


 
Title: Re: Obama on Ft. Hood, Not Even
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 02:08:53 PM
^^^^^

Mons - ring any bells?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 02:09:34 PM
My Buddy HH6 defends this country.  You mock it and make a joke of it.  You wish for our soldiers to be killed via IED attack.    

  
^^^^^^

 
Die in a fire shitbag.






Karma.

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 08, 2009, 02:33:39 PM

Just telling you what I've experienced.

 

The only thing you have experienced are overdoses of meth, coke, X, heroin, and alcohol.  
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 02:46:46 PM
The only thing you have experienced are overdoses of meth, coke, X, heroin, and alcohol.  

I don't even drink beer.  ;D
Title: Re: American Muslims fear backlash...
Post by: Mons Venus on November 08, 2009, 02:50:47 PM
There are plenty of examples on this board of why law abiding muslims might be worried

I agree!


Nopoe all DOUCHEBAGS like u. Die in a fire shitbag.


Title: Re: Obama's 10 month Record so Far.
Post by: headhuntersix on November 08, 2009, 03:37:59 PM
Nope.....I defend the country...u waste my oxygen. Again..die in a fire pussy.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 08, 2009, 06:23:49 PM
Hugo,

I feel honored that you have included me in this newly created thread.

For my first post, I would like to note that:

Mons,

From that movie (whatever), YOU are a piece of prehistoric dinosaur shit at the bottom of a New Jersey scum swamp.  If you have your boyfriends cock in your hand right now, stick it and your anti-servicemen posts straight up your ass.

Go fuck yourself.


Sincerely,


Skip
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 08, 2009, 06:58:37 PM
Mons, why don't you just apologize for what you said?  You know you don't have to be mortal enemies with the people here to oppose them politically.  HH6 is actually a good fella.  I disagree with 3333 on how he posts his opinions but other than that he seems like a good fella too.  There are a lot of Vets and active military posting here.  Even if you were joking or whatever, it wasn't cool to say what you said.  It might not be a bad idea to recognize what you said was fucked up and apologize.  But that's up to you.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 09, 2009, 05:43:19 AM
Mons, why don't you just apologize for what you said?  You know you don't have to be mortal enemies with the people here to oppose them politically.  HH6 is actually a good fella.  I disagree with 3333 on how he posts his opinions but other than that he seems like a good fella too.  There are a lot of Vets and active military posting here.  Even if you were joking or whatever, it wasn't cool to say what you said.  It might not be a bad idea to recognize what you said was fucked up and apologize.  But that's up to you.

Thats all he has to do Hugo. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 09, 2009, 05:49:21 AM
Thats all he has to do Hugo. 
Mons, what do you say?  Not trying to force you because it doesn't mean anything unless you mean it so it's your call? 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 09, 2009, 06:23:36 AM
Oh and he needs to come clean on the "vet" thing as well.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 09, 2009, 07:04:28 AM
Oh and he needs to come clean on the "vet" thing as well.
Ok,  Mons, I understand if you don't want to share that info online.  Perhaps it can be sent to me via pm and I can confirm for HH?  That is if that would be satisfactory to you both?  There are several people here that can testify to my honesty.  I will not give out information shared via pm so anything on your DD 214 sent will only be confirmed and not shared.  HH if you have any stipulations for this, express them now, such as the pic of the 214 being taken with a sticky saying "this is mons" or whatever...  I don't know if this will fly but I'm happy to act as a middleman to settle this dispute and everyone has my word that I'll be an honest and removed mediary.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 09, 2009, 07:12:22 AM
Ok,  Mons, I understand if you don't want to share that info online.  Perhaps it can be sent to me via pm and I can confirm for HH?  That is if that would be satisfactory to you both?  There are several people here that can testify to my honesty.  I will not give out information shared via pm so anything on your DD 214 sent will only be confirmed and not shared.  HH if you have any stipulations for this, express them now, such as the pic of the 214 being taken with a sticky saying "this is mons" or whatever...  I don't know if this will fly but I'm happy to act as a middleman to settle this dispute and everyone has my word that I'll be an honest and removed mediary.

I'm fine with that. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 09, 2009, 03:22:28 PM
That 214 will be turned over to the appropriate authorities as I am not an S1 clerk. I can spot a fake by the verbiage. He can cross out his name and SSN ,as we've offered before.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: OzmO on November 09, 2009, 04:44:25 PM
Why are you guys wasting time on this tard?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 04:48:10 AM
Why are you guys wasting time on this tard?

1.  I had a friend killed in Iraq by IED and Mons refuses to apologize for his comments. 

2.  HH6 takes this phony war vet shit serious and Mons put forth a challenge to me that i accepted that he himself backed down from.  I am stillw aiting for him to man up. 

 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 10, 2009, 06:17:03 AM
Because O..u don't say what he said and then pretend to be a vet...especially to this extent.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 10, 2009, 07:32:06 AM
Fagboy Mons commented on the Happy Birthday Marine Corps thread on the G&O...."Baby killers...."   How is this guy not in TO or banned?  Sad.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 07:35:27 AM
Fagboy Mons commented on the Happy Birthday Marine Corps thread on the G&O...."Baby killers...."   How is this guy not in TO or banned?  Sad.

Send that to Hugo - if that is true - he needs to be banned. 

Hugo - did you read that?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 10, 2009, 07:50:02 AM
Fagboy Mons commented on the Happy Birthday Marine Corps thread on the G&O...."Baby killers...."    How is this guy not in TO or banned?  Sad.


U.S. soldier Steven Green has been charged with murder and rape, allegedly committed while serving in Iraq. Green is accused of raping a 15-year-old girl and then shooting and killing her. He is also charged with murdering her mother, father, and 5-year-old sister. At least three other soldiers may be involved.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 10, 2009, 07:51:11 AM

U.S. soldier Steven Green has been charged with murder and rape, allegedly committed while serving in Iraq. Green is accused of raping a 15-year-old girl and then shooting and killing her. He is also charged with murdering her mother, father, and 5-year-old sister. At least three other soldiers may be involved.


Interesting. I guess all Americans are baby killers then.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 07:52:36 AM

U.S. soldier Steven Green has been charged with murder and rape, allegedly committed while serving in Iraq. Green is accused of raping a 15-year-old girl and then shooting and killing her. He is also charged with murdering her mother, father, and 5-year-old sister. At least three other soldiers may be involved.


What does that have to do with the whole marine corps you nasty POFS? 

BTW - you backed down from the challenge you gave to me.

Care to man up bitch?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 10, 2009, 08:02:00 AM
What does that have to do with the whole marine corps you nasty POFS? 

BTW - you backed down from the challenge you gave to me.

Care to man up bitch?

This "guy" is a joke.....
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 10, 2009, 08:43:32 AM



WMD's or 911?


Truth sucks.  :'( 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 10, 2009, 08:54:12 AM
Thank you solider.....for the truth!


Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 08:55:49 AM
Thank you solider.....for the truth!




Keep it up shitbag. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 10, 2009, 09:03:16 AM
Keep it up shitbag.  

I realize the TRUTH hurts NeoCons.


I forgot,,,,was it WMD's or 911 ?? I get mixed up.  ::)


I'll let the US Military speak.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 10, 2009, 10:52:49 AM
Interesting. I guess all Americans are baby killers then.

Bump.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 11:14:59 AM
Bump.

Bezerk, people can say whatever they want to me, I give it and get it, its all good. 

However, when someone says shit like mons did, and refuses to take it back, then I dont back down, ever. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 11:26:55 AM
And where are your records jerkoff? 

Oh that's right, you fagged out and refused to post them because HH6 will have you locked up.

 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 10, 2009, 11:29:38 AM
Bezerk, people can say whatever they want to me, I give it and get it, its all good.  

However, when someone says shit like mons did, and refuses to take it back, then I dont back down, ever.  

The guy is a lying scumbag that has been run off pretty much every board on Getbig. His rationale that because three soldiers killed a family (nevermind the fact that they were ARRESTED) means all soldiers are baby killers is idiotic. And let's be honest, how many people who served would call their fellow soldiers baby killers?  ::)

Let's just cut the bullshit. Mons hasn't served, hasn't been anywhere near the military, doesn't run anything close to a successful business and is really nothing more than a lying piece of shit. His stalker tendencies (as evidenced by him following 333 and HH6 all around this board) are incredibly creepy as well.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 11:33:11 AM
The guy is a lying scumbag that has been run off pretty much every board on Getbig. His rationale that because three soldiers killed a family (nevermind the fact that they were ARRESTED) means all soldiers are baby killers is idiotic. And let's be honest, how many former soldiers would call their fellow soldiers baby killers?  ::)

OR WISH 50,000 OF THEM DEAD IN IED ATTACKS?

MONS IS THIS YOU?   MAYBE YOUR FROM WESTBORO CHURCH WITH YOUR SHIT? 

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 10, 2009, 11:40:24 AM
I look through his posts and I have found many where he claims to be a vet, then claims to be the parent of a vet, then claims to be the son of a disable vet.

Whats next you knew the brother of a guys second cousin twice removed on his mothers side who once though about joining the military?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 10, 2009, 11:47:29 AM
Fort Dix
    V
Fort Benning
    V
Panama
    V
Desert Storm


Tommorrow's Veteran's Day......make sure you THANK ME for my service.



FT Dix closed as a basic training base in 1988/89......so thats possible. Who at Benning....U were with 3rd Ranger Bat? Good,  one of my best friends dropped in with 3rd.  This also makes u in ur 40's.  Nobody else from Benning was there, unless it was a small unit.



You're correct on all counts "solider".   :-*

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 11:51:45 AM
Fort Dix
    V
Fort Benning
    V
Panama
    V
Desert Storm


Tommorrow's Veteran's Day......make sure you THANK ME for my service.



You're correct on all counts "solider".   :-*



HH6 ASKED YOU FOR YOUR RECORDS TO VERIFY IT.  PONY UP. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 10, 2009, 11:53:41 AM
Fort Dix
    V
Fort Benning
    V
Panama
    V
Desert Storm


Tommorrow's Veteran's Day......make sure you THANK ME for my service.



You're correct on all counts "solider".   :-*



You know what fuck you, you provide no proof other than conflicting bullshit, even if you were in the military I still have to give you a big old fuck you and the last thing I will ever do i thank a fucking asshole like you.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 10, 2009, 01:29:06 PM
Mons - is this you?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 10, 2009, 01:56:36 PM
Mons - is this you?

Can't be......that guy was actually in the military for a little while.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 10, 2009, 02:34:38 PM
Can't be......that guy was actually in the military for a little while.

 :D
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 10, 2009, 03:08:40 PM
Fort Dix
    V
Fort Benning
    V
Panama
    V
Desert Storm


Tommorrow's Veteran's Day......make sure you THANK ME for my service.



You're correct on all counts "solider".   :-*




Go fuck yourself wannabe.  You have to earn that thanks.  You can start by signing up here:  http://www.goarmy.com/contact/find_a_recruiter.jsp?hmref=cs



And stop beating off to pics of board members who are superior to you.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 10, 2009, 04:50:49 PM
Hey guys if u want to pretend to be a soldier..i can lay it all out for just like I did for Mons....cool...My current BDE CDR was with 3rd Batt in Panama...who was ur S3 and Company CDR. When did u go to Ranger School....who was the 4th RTB CDR...u are soooooooooooooo full of shit and u just backed urslef into a corner. Hey Mons here's a hint as u continue to commit this felony...don't paint urslef into a unit u know next to nothing about. If I were u I'd say u were with 5th ID and leave it at that....5th ID was a big place. Not alot of Rangers from 3rd Batt still running around, from those days..but I know a few.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 10, 2009, 08:22:46 PM
mons, the offer still stands.  You can send me this stuff via pm and I won't share your info on the board.  If I do share your info, I'll step down as mod right away.  I'll confer with HH6 via pm on your records without giving out your name or the portion you wish to protect.  At least pm me on this so we can try to work out a solution satifactory to all.  If you did serve, it's not cool for you to be taking a hit and mocked.  Let's settle this, PM me.

I'm good for my word, if I cross it, you can quote this to Ron as a promise that I'll step down as mod.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 10, 2009, 08:30:15 PM
He can easily be vetted at SOCNET, they have a whole section dedicated to Rangers.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 10, 2009, 09:21:59 PM
He can easily be vetted at SOCNET, they have a whole section dedicated to Rangers.
have no idea what socnet is?  explain?  That might be an easy answer here.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 10, 2009, 09:27:17 PM
have no idea what socnet is?  explain?  That might be an easy answer here.

SOCNET is a message board run by former and current spec ops members ( seals, rangers.......) they can and will vet anyone who claims military service who joins the board, a word of caution, they don't fuck around, if someone was to go over there with some BS they will go after them.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 10, 2009, 09:32:49 PM
SOCNET is a message board run by former and current spec ops members ( seals, rangers.......) they can and will vet anyone who claims military service who joins the board, a word of caution, they don't fuck around, if someone was to go over there with some BS they will go after them.
ok, sounds good but how will we know here?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 04:35:43 AM
ok, sounds good but how will we know here?

Hugo - I trust you to do the right thing if mons steps up and gives you the info.   
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 11, 2009, 04:47:32 AM
Hugo - I trust you to do the right thing if mons steps up and gives you the info.   
I will, I promise that to all.
Title: Re: 2,266 Veterans Died In 2008 Because They Were Uninsured.
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 07:34:53 AM

According to a study released by the Harvard Medical School, 2,266 veterans under the age of 65 died last year as a result of not having health insurance. Researchers emphasize that "that figure is more than 14 times the number of deaths (155) suffered by U.S. troops in Afghanistan in 2008, and more than twice as many as have died (911 as of Oct. 31) since the war began in 2001."

The 1.46 million working-age veterans that did not have health insurance last year all experienced reduced access to care as a consequence, leading to "six preventable deaths a day."

Like other uninsured Americans, most uninsured vets are working people -- too poor to afford private coverage but not poor enough to qualify for Medicaid or means-tested VA care," said Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, a professor at Harvard Medical School. [...]

Dr. David Himmelstein, the co-author of the report and associate professor of medicine at Harvard, commented, "On this Veterans Day we should not only honor the nearly 500 soldiers who have died this year in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also the more than 2,200 veterans who were killed by our broken health insurance system.  That's six preventable deaths a day."


The study's authors warn that the health care legislation "would do virtually nothing for the uninsured until 2013" and would "leave at least 17 million uninsured over the long run when reform kicks in," leaving many veterans still without care.

------------------------------


No wonder Republicans are voting AGAINST Healthcare reform.



WWJD?









EITHER GIVE YOUR RECORDS TO HUGO OR KILL YOURSELF.
Title: Re: 2,266 Veterans Died In 2008 Because They Were Uninsured.
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 07:43:27 AM
Seems as if Republicans enjoy DEATH.


WWJD?

HUGO - MONS IS CLEARLY SAYING SHE IS A VET AGAIN.   EITHER SHE GIVES YOU THE INFO OR SHE NEEDS TO GO.

BTW - Mons - you libs are amazing - you cry about religion yet bring up Jesus whenever you think it fits your personal agenda.   


GIVE YOUR RECORDS TO HUGO BITCH! 
Title: Re: 2,266 Veterans Died In 2008 Because They Were Uninsured.
Post by: BM OUT on November 11, 2009, 07:59:36 AM
Another lib lie.If they would go to a hospital they would get taken care of.This is like saying people starved to death in the United states when there are food banks and programs all over the place.

By the way,the democrats are the party of death.They love abortions and killing the elderly.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 11, 2009, 08:59:56 AM
Kazan...thats what I've warned him about. The guys I was going through were gonna send the stuff to those guys and they don't play. If he has ever used his "vet status" for monetary gain or worn a uniform with faudulent medals etc..they will persue felony charges. Mons thinks this is a joke..its not shitbag. That DD214 better be real.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 09:02:15 AM
Kazan...thats what I've warned him about. The guys I was going through were gonna send the stuff to those guys and they don't play. If he has ever used his "vet status" for monetary gain or worn a uniform with faudulent medals etc..they will persue felony charges. Mons thinks this is a joke..its not shitbag. That DD214 better be real.

He is still doing it today!
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 11, 2009, 09:34:10 AM
Kazan...thats what I've warned him about. The guys I was going through were gonna send the stuff to those guys and they don't play. If he has ever used his "vet status" for monetary gain or worn a uniform with faudulent medals etc..they will persue felony charges. Mons thinks this is a joke..its not shitbag. That DD214 better be real.


I go to SOCNET daily to see what's going on, good people, but they will unleash hell if you are a poser.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 11, 2009, 09:35:46 AM

I go to SOCNET daily to see what's going on, good people, but they will unleash hell if you are a poser.
do a lot of people really do that?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 11, 2009, 09:37:01 AM
do a lot of people really do that?

You would be surprised how many fake vets there are out there.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 09:38:19 AM
You would be surprised how many fake vets there are out there.

Notice how the mental patient has not responded on this thread?

 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 11, 2009, 09:44:54 AM
Notice how the mental patient has not responded on this thread?

 

Because he is full of shit, it is not that hard to find enough information on the internet to make it appear you were in the Military. The problem is when you get called on it and have to prove it. He tried the jump wing crap, when those and just about any other decoration can be purchased on line.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 09:49:58 AM
Because he is full of shit, it is not that hard to find enough information on the internet to make it appear you were in the Military. The problem is when you get called on it and have to prove it. He tried the jump wing crap, when those and just about any other decoration can be purchased on line.

The problem is that he boxed himself in with his lies.   He is truly a disgusting POFS.  There is no other poster on this entire site i feel that way about.  Even though I may trade insults with others, its all in good fun, even with straw, lurker or KC. 

However, I dont feel that way with this animal.   
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 11, 2009, 10:05:46 AM


WWJD?


Not a believer myself, but I think even he might just slap the shit outta you.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 11, 2009, 10:08:12 AM

Not a believer myself, but I think even he might just slap the shit outta you.

No kidding.  I dont remember Jesus advocating paying Ceasar for "health care" with the threat of jail if you didnt comply. 

Mons - CORNER OF NEREID AVE. & WEBSTER AVE., BRONX, N.Y. ANY TIME YOU LIKE!     
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 08:50:27 AM
WHERE ARE YOU MONS!
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 13, 2009, 08:54:43 AM
No answers from the supedouchbag...he knows he's been caught and he has nothing....Hugo don't let him post to he admits he's full of shit or produces something otherwise we should be free to flame him anywhere he posts here.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 09:02:16 AM
No answers from the supedouchbag...he knows he's been caught and he has nothing....Hugo don't let him post to he admits he's full of shit or produces something otherwise we should be free to flame him anywhere he posts here.

WHERE ARE YOU MONS?     
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Mons Venus on November 13, 2009, 11:15:06 AM
Part 2:
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Mons Venus on November 13, 2009, 11:16:34 AM
Part 3:
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Mons Venus on November 13, 2009, 11:18:12 AM
Part 4:
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Mons Venus on November 13, 2009, 11:21:07 AM
There are 9 sickening parts to this story.



Suuccmbags and liars !!!!
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 11:30:24 AM
Hey dipshit - why dont you respond to the thread that is stikied?  

Are you afraid of jail for posing as a fake soldier?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 11:42:50 AM
WHERE ARE YOU MONS?     

COME ON YOU TRAITOROUS BITCH! 

YOU HAVE TIME TO POST 9/11 CT'S BUT NOT RESPOND HERE? 
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: headhuntersix on November 13, 2009, 11:48:09 AM
Bush defended us....so come shoot me dead tough guy. I'll  nail ur bleeding ass to the door of the local VFW...with a sign detailing ur bullshit.
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 11:51:37 AM
Bush defended us....so come shoot me dead tough guy. I'll  nail ur bleeding ass to the door of the local VFW...with a sign detailing ur bullshit.

There still is ZERO evidence of credible 9/11 CT, yet these morons still post this trash. 

Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: 240 is Back on November 13, 2009, 11:54:13 AM
There still is ZERO evidence of credible 9/11 CT, yet these morons still post this trash. 

A lot of military, FDNY, and NYPD disagree with you.  Also a nice stack of mechanical engineers, physicists, etc.

I tend to think these people know more about the topic than you, or I. 
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 11:57:30 AM
A lot of military, FDNY, and NYPD disagree with you.  Also a nice stack of mechanical engineers, physicists, etc.

I tend to think these people know more about the topic than you, or I. 

240 - a CT requires participants, motive, opportunity, and most especially - EVIDENCE! 

Give me your best evidence of credible CT that not only makes sense, but does not fall all over itself with contradictions, half-truths, and other gross leaps of faith. 
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: 240 is Back on November 13, 2009, 11:58:43 AM
240 - a CT requires participants, motive, opportunity, and most especially - EVIDENCE! 

Give me your best evidence of credible CT that not only makes sense, but does not fall all over itself with contradictions, half-truths, and other gross leaps of faith. 

that anti-obama Alex Jones video you were loving on a few weeks back was PACKED with 911 truthers.


You're on the CT team with the rest of us.  You just subscribe to different ones :)

Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 12:15:05 PM
that anti-obama Alex Jones video you were loving on a few weeks back was PACKED with 911 truthers.


You're on the CT team with the rest of us.  You just subscribe to different ones :)



I have said many times, and you know this, I am not saying people would not want to do it, but you need credible evidence to prove your case. 

So far, all that has been presented are rambling theories with no basis in fact or logic. 
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: BodyProSite on November 13, 2009, 12:22:22 PM
maybe bush would have been able to do more if clinton hadnt spent 8 years downsizing the military and pulling funding from the military , oh and dont forget that there is factual evidence that the planning to perform that attack started 7 years prior , planning the funding , and what was gona take place and recruiting people to do it, so that means this all toook place for 6 years while bill clinton was pres. maybe he shouldnt have pulled so much away from national security .  but i guess people forget that , just like how liberals forget the contitution when they impose socialist bills on america
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Kazan on November 13, 2009, 12:24:07 PM
maybe bush would have been able to do more if clinton hadnt spent 8 years downsizing the military and pulling funding from the military , oh and dont forget that there is factual evidence that the planning to perform that attack started 7 years prior , planning the funding , and what was gona take place and recruiting people to do it, so that means this all toook place for 6 years while bill clinton was pres. maybe he shouldnt have pulled so much away from national security .  but i guess people forget that , just like how liberals forget the contitution when they impose socialist bills on america

Don't fall into the trap, ignore Mons Anus, and you will be much happier
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: BodyProSite on November 13, 2009, 12:26:22 PM
there are numerous cia intel reports stating that plans for this were taking place.... did clinton do anything for 6 years  hell no,  so maybe some of you need to put blame where its due, bush may not have announced we were being attacked fast enough but clinton had dozens of chances to stop the whole dam thing b4 it happened
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Mons Venus on November 13, 2009, 12:58:26 PM
Bush FAILED to protect our Country and the 911 families know it!  >:(
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: BodyProSite on November 13, 2009, 01:03:06 PM
clinton failed and there is mounds of paper work to prove it dumb ass what factual evidence do you have against bush , let me guess  he was also responsible for hurricane katrina forming  out in the atlantic too ????
Title: Re: Bush admits Iraq was 'a terrible mistake'
Post by: Mons Venus on November 13, 2009, 01:14:58 PM
So Bush admits Iraq was a terrible mistake.

Bush apparently agrees with ME!


So WTF did we accomplish besides THOUSANDS of DEAD soldiers?


Answer: Nothing
Title: Re: Bush admits Iraq was 'a terrible mistake'
Post by: chadstallion on November 13, 2009, 01:24:37 PM



BUSH IS A MURDERER!


Every dead soldiers blood is on his Satanic hands!
nothing like being 8 years late....
Title: Re: Bush admits that Iraq Had Nothing To Do With 9/11
Post by: Hedgehog on November 13, 2009, 02:09:05 PM
I saw a documentary on how young guys were recruited for service. Lots of guys who go because they're out of options in life.
It's basically the same thing that John Fogerty sang about 40 years ago in 'Fortunate Son'. Only that this time the unequalities are even bigger.

This time no senator's son will have to go - unless they want to.
A laid off 20 year old in rural Indiana don't have the same luxury of picking and choosing.
:/
Title: Re: Bush admits that Iraq Had Nothing To Do With 9/11
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 13, 2009, 02:11:37 PM
Bush said that years ago and also made an excuse for the others out trying to push the link, like Cheney.
Title: Re: The Failure of George W Bush to Defend U.S. Skies
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 13, 2009, 02:18:08 PM
Bush FAILED to protect our Country and the 911 families know it!  >:(

SEND HUGO YOUR RECORDS OR KILL YOURSELF YOU DOPED UP LEFT WING FREAK.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 13, 2009, 03:02:36 PM
WHY NO OUTRAGE?  >:(

Answer: You pathetic pukes don't give a flying fvvck about our Veterans.









There's tons of outrage about scum sucking, bottom dwelling, shit stains like you that wish our Vets dead and murdered.  All the while trying to pose as one themselves.  That's why this thread has been stickied retard.

I'm kinda thinking now that you belong to the fucktard Phelps clan.  Maybe you're his twink.  I think it's pretty well established you like it in the ass...
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 13, 2009, 04:44:02 PM
Hey Mons are u a registered member of any of the anti-war groups...I hope so..u'll make my job that much easier.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 14, 2009, 05:26:15 AM
                                                       Veterans Against Iraq War
  

                                                         Statement of Purpose  


Veterans Against Iraq War is a coalition of American veterans who support our troops but oppose war with Iraq  or any other nation that does not pose a clear and present danger to our people and nation.

Until and unless the current U.S. Administration provides evidence which clearly demonstrates that Iraq or any other nation poses a clear, direct and immediate danger to our country, we oppose all of this Administration's pre-emptive and unilateral military activities in Iraq. Furthermore, we cannot support any war that is initiated without a formal Declaration of War by Congress, as our Constitution requires.


Furthermore, we do not believe that the American military can or should be used as the police force of the world by any administration, Republican or Democrat. Consequently, we believe that the lives and well being of our nation's soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines should not be squandered or sacrificed for causes other than in the direct defense of our people and nation.
 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 14, 2009, 06:37:45 AM
How to Spot a Phony Military Veteran


Don't be fooled by a poser. These are phony military veterans, people who never served, or people claiming to participate in an operation they never conducted. Watching these guys get evasive and tap dance around probing questions is entertaining. Learn how to recognize one; they're leaching from real heroes for their own personal gain. Do our troops a favor by letting these posers know that the gig's up.

Ask to see their DD214.

Track your behavior as well as that of other veterans if you've served. Talk to friends or relatives if you've never served and get to know how military people think and do things. Project your observations to military and veteran personnel you've never met.

Keep your eyes and ears peeled for people that constantly brag about being SEALS, pilots or any specialty that requires danger and action. Pay attention to their rank and specialty claims. They're expecting you to tie them to the recent blockbuster military film you saw.

Be observant during military appreciation days. Seeing enough genuine veterans should give you an idea of what these guys look like. Stop someone that looks out of place, like someone that isn't wearing his uniform properly. Also, stop a person that looks like an overstuffed potato bag in uniform. Or a "vet" in uniform who doesn't look professional; military personnel and veterans look sharp partly because of the inspections they've experienced.

Talk to a "veteran" if you suspect him to be a phony. Listen to his stories. Then ask him basic questions about his jobs. Every service member knows their job specialty and number, or remembers it if they were veterans. If they can't figure that out, they're a phony. Ask a "SEAL" what his BUD'S class number is. They're a phony if they can't spit that information out.

Ask them what they did in between missions. They should relay a description that sounds like they did administrative duties. Use your own experience and knowledge if you're a veteran. Find out from a veteran if you're not one.

Inquire from them their name, rank, where they were stationed and what years they were stationed. Ask them where they went to basic and specialist training. Ask them detailed questions. A veteran will spit these out without effort. A phony will have a little difficulty answering you.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 14, 2009, 06:40:52 AM
"The name and regiment of the person with the action so certified are to be entered in the
'Book of Merit,' which will be kept at the orderly office. Should any who are not entitled
to these honors have the insolence to assume the badges of them, they shall be severely
punished."



-General George Washington

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 14, 2009, 07:06:33 AM
How to Spot a Phony Military Veteran


Don't be fooled by a poser. These are phony military veterans, people who never served, or people claiming to participate in an operation they never conducted. Watching these guys get evasive and tap dance around probing questions is entertaining. Learn how to recognize one; they're leaching from real heroes for their own personal gain. Do our troops a favor by letting these posers know that the gig's up.

Ask to see their DD214.

Track your behavior as well as that of other veterans if you've served. Talk to friends or relatives if you've never served and get to know how military people think and do things. Project your observations to military and veteran personnel you've never met.

Keep your eyes and ears peeled for people that constantly brag about being SEALS, pilots or any specialty that requires danger and action. Pay attention to their rank and specialty claims. They're expecting you to tie them to the recent blockbuster military film you saw.

Be observant during military appreciation days. Seeing enough genuine veterans should give you an idea of what these guys look like. Stop someone that looks out of place, like someone that isn't wearing his uniform properly. Also, stop a person that looks like an overstuffed potato bag in uniform. Or a "vet" in uniform who doesn't look professional; military personnel and veterans look sharp partly because of the inspections they've experienced.

Talk to a "veteran" if you suspect him to be a phony. Listen to his stories. Then ask him basic questions about his jobs. Every service member knows their job specialty and number, or remembers it if they were veterans. If they can't figure that out, they're a phony. Ask a "SEAL" what his BUD'S class number is. They're a phony if they can't spit that information out.

Ask them what they did in between missions. They should relay a description that sounds like they did administrative duties. Use your own experience and knowledge if you're a veteran. Find out from a veteran if you're not one.

Inquire from them their name, rank, where they were stationed and what years they were stationed. Ask them where they went to basic and specialist training. Ask them detailed questions. A veteran will spit these out without effort. A phony will have a little difficulty answering you.


Come on Mons - put up or shut up you benedict arnold bitch. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 14, 2009, 09:03:36 AM
Skip has layed out all the basics Mons...thats the easy stuff and u can't even pass that, and ur on the net. U can't get it right and ur sitting in front of a computer. I bet if we all saw u we'd all burst out laughing. BUt I'm not letting it go shitbag..ur not a Vet, nor a Ranger, nor a Paratrooper...ur a fraud.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 15, 2009, 06:18:30 AM
Skip has layed out all the basics Mons...thats the easy stuff and u can't even pass that, and ur on the net. U can't get it right and ur sitting in front of a computer. I bet if we all saw u we'd all burst out laughing. BUt I'm not letting it go shitbag..ur not a Vet, nor a Ranger, nor a Paratrooper...ur a fraud.

COME ON BITCH - IF YOU WANT ME GONE FOR GOOD, GIVE HUGO YOUR INFORMATION. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 15, 2009, 02:58:34 PM
How to Spot a Phony Military Veteran


Don't be fooled by a poser. These are phony military veterans, people who never served, or people claiming to participate in an operation they never conducted. Watching these guys get evasive and tap dance around probing questions is entertaining. Learn how to recognize one; they're leaching from real heroes for their own personal gain. Do our troops a favor by letting these posers know that the gig's up.

Ask to see their DD214.

Track your behavior as well as that of other veterans if you've served. Talk to friends or relatives if you've never served and get to know how military people think and do things. Project your observations to military and veteran personnel you've never met.

Keep your eyes and ears peeled for people that constantly brag about being SEALS, pilots or any specialty that requires danger and action. Pay attention to their rank and specialty claims. They're expecting you to tie them to the recent blockbuster military film you saw.

Be observant during military appreciation days. Seeing enough genuine veterans should give you an idea of what these guys look like. Stop someone that looks out of place, like someone that isn't wearing his uniform properly. Also, stop a person that looks like an overstuffed potato bag in uniform. Or a "vet" in uniform who doesn't look professional; military personnel and veterans look sharp partly because of the inspections they've experienced.

Talk to a "veteran" if you suspect him to be a phony. Listen to his stories. Then ask him basic questions about his jobs. Every service member knows their job specialty and number, or remembers it if they were veterans. If they can't figure that out, they're a phony. Ask a "SEAL" what his BUD'S class number is. They're a phony if they can't spit that information out.

Ask them what they did in between missions. They should relay a description that sounds like they did administrative duties. Use your own experience and knowledge if you're a veteran. Find out from a veteran if you're not one.

Inquire from them their name, rank, where they were stationed and what years they were stationed. Ask them where they went to basic and specialist training. Ask them detailed questions. A veteran will spit these out without effort. A phony will have a little difficulty answering you.


Everything in this post regarding fake soldiers fits Mons PERFECTLY.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 15, 2009, 03:36:41 PM



Weapons of mass destruction        LIE!

Saddam linked with 9/11               LIE!  

“We don’t torture.”                      LIE!

 

"A cadet will not lie, cheat, or steal,

or tolerate those who do."

Cadet Honor Code  
  

"The Honor System as a feature of West Point seems to grow in importance with a graduate as the years secede until finally it becomes something which he is almost reluctant to talk about -- it occupies a position in his mind akin to the virtue of his mother or his sister." (1)

 

Dwight D. Eisenhower

United States Military Academy

Class of 1915

  

 

WHY DIE FOR A LIE?

WHY KILL FOR A LIE?

WHY TOLERATE LIARS?

 

 
 "When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war." (2)

"I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its stupidity. War settles nothing." (3)

"Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion." (4)

"If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison. They’ll have enough to eat, a bed and a roof over their heads. But if an American wants to preserve his dignity and his equality as a human being, he must not bow his neck to any dictatorial government." (5)

 

Dwight D. Eisenhower

34th President of the United States

(1953-1961)
 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 15, 2009, 03:46:01 PM
And nowhere in that post has ur dd214...ur a fraud who is a massive pussy. This thread exists solely for u to back up ur bullshit..nothing else..nothing. Ur a fraud Mons and a pussy.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 15, 2009, 03:51:52 PM
And nowhere in that post has ur dd214...ur a fraud who is a massive pussy. This thread exists solely for u to back up ur bullshit..nothing else..nothing. Ur a fraud Mons and a pussy.

Your Posts are well documented and copied. I'd watch your ass... punk! ;)



UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
Congressional Code of Military Criminal Law applicable to all military members worldwide.

 
888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.  


 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 15, 2009, 04:09:07 PM
This guy has never failed at anything...we will see what the shitbag n chief does.  

^^^^^ Someone is watching. Be careful.  ;)


  UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE Congressional Code of Military Criminal Law applicable to all military members worldwide.
 
888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 15, 2009, 09:46:18 PM
Mons, why are you against sending me your 214?  A least give a reason so we can figure out a way to settle this once and for all.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 16, 2009, 04:43:48 AM
^^^^^^ Needs dentist and a new suit from daddy. ;D

Oxy10 would also help.  :-X

WHERE ARE YOUR RECORDS?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 16, 2009, 07:31:04 AM
Mons, why are you against sending me your 214?  A least give a reason so we can figure out a way to settle this once and for all.

Gee I wonder why? Maybe because he/she/it doesn't have one, notice how now the VAIW crap suddenly appears. Got news for you Anus, the VAIW, IVAW ...... has been shredded by real vets for all the fake, had a 2 hr stop over in Iraq/Afghanistan vets they parade out with their bullshit stories.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 16, 2009, 08:27:07 AM
Got this from Mons....he has no idea about the blog regs put in place by USAPA or that there are even blogregs. I assure u Mon, u worthless piece of shit..there is no Major Headhuntersix on my uniform..nor does he speak for official US Army policy..u however are in violation of Federal regs dealing with faking military service. If u post that 214 and its fake...ur done. I will FOIA ur information as anybody can do..and then become a prize pain in the ass of the Attorney General of ur state until they kick ur door down.


Watch out kid.....you're being watched. 

UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
Congressional Code of Military Criminal Law applicable to all military members worldwide.
 
888. ART. 88. CONTEMPT TOWARD OFFICIALS
Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 16, 2009, 09:25:39 AM
Hugo - if mons does not give you the info - what do you suggest we do? 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 16, 2009, 11:04:46 AM
I say he has to let us continue to frog stomp Mons on all his threads..I can't allow this guy to say the things he's said..and then claim to be a vet.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 16, 2009, 11:07:19 AM
I say he has to let us continue to frog stomp Mons on all his threads..I can't allow this guy to say the things he's said..and then claim to be a vet.

Me neither.  Hugo - i say you give mons a 30 day deadline to get you the info or he is free game everywhere all the time, regardless, anywhere, all the time.   
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 16, 2009, 02:15:07 PM
Me neither.  Hugo - i say you give mons a 30 day deadline to get you the info or he is free game everywhere all the time, regardless, anywhere, all the time.   
I think you need to shut your drama queen fucking mouth 3333.  No, you are not going to keep posting this all over the board.  I'm quite sick of it spaming the board daily.  This isn't the "get mons board"  There's a sticky on this because I would rather have it right here at the top of the forum than in every thread mons posts.  You should be thanking me moron.  Instead, as usual, you only see things your way with no consideration for anyone else.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 16, 2009, 02:30:01 PM
I think you need to shut your drama queen fucking mouth 3333.  No, you are not going to keep posting this all over the board.  I'm quite sick of it spaming the board daily.  This isn't the "get mons board"  There's a sticky on this because I would rather have it right here at the top of the forum than in every thread mons posts.  You should be thanking me moron.  Instead, as usual, you only see things your way with no consideration for anyone else.

Oh relax and have a drink.  How long are you going to have this stikied up here? 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 16, 2009, 02:38:19 PM
Oh relax and have a drink.  How long are you going to have this stikied up here? 
until this is over, like I said, I would rather have it sticked than have the forum be about mons, which it is not.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 16, 2009, 02:39:52 PM
until this is over, like I said, I would rather have it sticked than have the forum be about mons, which it is not.

I know, I do think he needs to man up one way or the other. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 17, 2009, 10:01:59 AM
I know, I do think he needs to man up one way or the other. 

Hugo - serious question - if it turns out that mons faked his record - is it appropriate for us to make a formal referral in light of his comments?   
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 18, 2009, 09:48:19 AM
Hugo - serious question - if it turns out that mons faked his record - is it appropriate for us to make a formal referral in light of his comments?   
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 18, 2009, 05:32:39 PM
It takes 10 sec's to post his 214....this is over. Sorry Hugo...but I will haunt his every post and thread.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 18, 2009, 06:37:01 PM
It takes 10 sec's to post his 214....this is over. Sorry Hugo...but I will haunt his every post and thread.

Hugo - can we delare HH6 and I the winner in this and determine the penalty for Mons? 
\

Only kidding.  I will leave it up you what to do. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 18, 2009, 07:18:06 PM
I don't freaking know...  what does everyone else on the board want?  I just know i don't want several threads a day diverted to talk about the mons issue.  I'd like to hear from other regulars here.  Should mons be banned for saying the things he's said?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 18, 2009, 07:54:01 PM
I don't freaking know...  what does everyone else on the board want?  I just know i don't want several threads a day diverted to talk about the mons issue.  I'd like to hear from other regulars here.  Should mons be banned for saying the things he's said?


I don't know if I count as a regular, but I'd love to see his worthless, dumb, good-for-nothing, wishing our vets dead and maimed, poser ass banned.  For life if possible.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 19, 2009, 05:25:26 AM
I don't freaking know...  what does everyone else on the board want?  I just know i don't want several threads a day diverted to talk about the mons issue.  I'd like to hear from other regulars here.  Should mons be banned for saying the things he's said?

I don't know what my opinion counts for, but I think ANYONE wishing death on US troops, or finding joy in it, should be banned.  With some of the goofy stuff I have seen people TO'd for in the past, I can't believe he's even around.  There are certain things that should be out of bounds on this board, let him take it to the G&O.

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 19, 2009, 06:35:22 AM
Yes....and u all count. Talking dogshit counts more then mons.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 19, 2009, 10:21:39 AM
Mons Venus prepares to pull some amazing G's.  8)


My Military connection/s will always remain strong, for which I am proud. (Unlike Bush's Faux WMD/911 Iraq War)  


BTW, HH6 and 333's...... GO FUCCK YOURSELVES!  

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 19, 2009, 10:26:28 AM
Unreal - so now you are a fighter pilot?  I didnt realize we had fighter pilots in Panama bombing places. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 19, 2009, 10:27:50 AM
Unreal - so now you are a fighter pilot?  I didnt realize we had fighter pilots in Panama bombing places.  

Pilot? Hell no! Back seat driver rider.  8)
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 19, 2009, 10:29:01 AM
Pilot? Hell no! Back seat driver.  8)

Ok - you should have no problem then giving hugo your records. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 19, 2009, 10:38:41 AM
Ok - you should have no problem then giving hugo your records. 

 

Sorry kid, MY personal records are MINE and I will NEVER release them.

 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 19, 2009, 10:41:22 AM


Sorry kid, MY personal records are MINE and I will NEVER release them.

 

Well if you cant prove your military service in light of what you posted you are likely to be banned by vote of the posters.  So make your choice.

I offered you an opportunity to get rid of me forever on this board and you ducked the challenge. 

You are a psychotic lib who needs to put down the crack pipe.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 19, 2009, 11:01:13 AM
I would alos like to point out for the record we all became "kids" after mons realized he'd be in his 40's to be a Panama vet. Further..Mons alll u have to do is black out ur name and social on the dd214...pretty friggen easy.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 19, 2009, 11:33:49 AM
What a fucking asshole, what happened to being a ranger? Remember you were going to post your jump wings? And why black out all the markings on the jet? Affraid someone may be able to identify the squadron? Let me go get my hip boots on before the bullshit gets any deeper
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 19, 2009, 12:40:30 PM
What a fucking asshole, what happened to being a ranger? Remember you were going to post your jump wings? And why black out all the markings on the jet? Affraid someone may be able to identify the squadron? Let me go get my hip boots on before the bullshit gets any deeper

Does this latest mons post add to his violations HH6?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 19, 2009, 12:46:21 PM
The fact that he is wasting oxygen is a violation
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 19, 2009, 12:48:14 PM
The fact that he is wasting oxygen is a violation

I bet that photo is from top gun or some movie promo. 

Hugo - what say you? 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 19, 2009, 01:04:09 PM
I bet that photo is from top gun or some movie promo.  

Hugo - what say you?  

That appears to be an F-16, and it would have to be the D variant in order for it to be a 2 seater.

The point is this dumbass can't even get his story strait.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Mons Venus on November 19, 2009, 01:18:13 PM
I bet that photo is from top gun or some movie promo. 

Hugo - what say you? 

Incorrect. It's a picture of me whether you like it or not. BTW, this will be my LAST post regarding this subject matter.

Goodbye.

 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 19, 2009, 01:22:34 PM
Yeah sure it is  ::)
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 19, 2009, 01:55:35 PM
Yeah...um...u said u were stationed at Benning and in the Army..not an AF EWO flying in an aircraft that came out after ur supposed tour of  duty. This will not end until ur banned. Oh yeah didn't u say u got out on the GI bill and went to school. If thats the case I missed when u became an Air Force pilot. Mons I've taxied in an F-16 when I was 10..my dad was an actual AF pilot. Anybody here can cut and paste and shop a photo..this proves nothing. Thats why i asked for ur DD214. Pics don't prove shit.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 19, 2009, 02:00:31 PM
That took about 30 seconds
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 19, 2009, 04:04:41 PM
if you guys are wanting a permanent ban of mons, I can't really do that.  Ron is the only one for that.  I can do temp bans for like 30 days at a time and if they do it again, ban them again.  first step should be warning a person for where they crossed the line and that was done as soon as what happened was brought to my attention.  And this is for what he said a couple years ago.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 19, 2009, 07:45:37 PM
HA HA, that fucking tool.  Looks like he mixed up his Georgia lies - Moody vs Benning.

And no Air Force vet makes comments like this:

911 proved our military is inept. Especially the Air Force.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 20, 2009, 06:28:46 AM
HA HA, that fucking tool.  Looks like he mixed up his Georgia lies - Moody vs Benning.

And no Air Force vet makes comments like this:


i seriously wish mons would make a trip to NYC. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: headhuntersix on November 20, 2009, 10:02:39 AM
Are we done yet..great research Skip.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 21, 2009, 04:31:59 AM
Is this all we have wanting him banned? a few people? You guys gotta give me more than this.  and I'm not siding with mons by saying that.  I was pretty pissed at what he said too when 3333 brought it to me and if he's claiming to be a vet and is not I consider that extremely fucked up.  So far his story seems bogus.  He even claims his 214 is private and only for him which made me wonder wtf?  Vets know how much they end up showing their 214 for this or that.  But this isn't enough to ban this guy. I warned him that wishing troops dead was crossing the line, even if it is not in the rules and I don't think he's done it again.  Guys, make a serious case why I should ban him and get the support for the ban.  I always side with vets but I'm in a spot on this one because this isn't just about me.  I have to consider the forum and all the people who post here.

Also, what rules would you guys like to see added to the forum to make sure a person on this forum doesn't get away with what you are accusing mons of?  Please think about that for a minute and give a constructive answer.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 21, 2009, 07:58:46 AM
Im not the moderator, but I say the next time Mons pulls anything remotely closs to what he did he gets banned. 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Kazan on November 21, 2009, 09:14:56 AM
He's a drive by Youtube poster, generally never contributes anything to the discussions, and most of the stuff he posts is just to piss people off. He's a troll of the highest order. Seems to me he is just wasting bandwith and oxygen.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 21, 2009, 02:42:48 PM
He's a drive by Youtube poster, generally never contributes anything to the discussions, and most of the stuff he posts is just to piss people off. He's a troll of the highest order. Seems to me he is just wasting bandwith and oxygen.
are you talking about BF or Mons?
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 21, 2009, 02:43:56 PM
Im not the moderator, but I say the next time Mons pulls anything remotely closs to what he did he gets banned. 
that already stated.  If he wishes troops dead again, he's gone
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 21, 2009, 02:44:51 PM
are you talking about BF or Mons?

BF might attack people too much personally, but Mons sometimes just seems like he is on a cocaine binge.  
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 21, 2009, 04:28:41 PM
BF might attack people too much personally, but Mons sometimes just seems like he is on a cocaine binge.  
Islam is the only serious topic for bf here, everything else posted for him is a trolling mission.  he gets deleted more than everyone else here combined.  How many times do people like you, hh, tony say things I disagree with and you never get deleted.  that's because you all are not trolling.  bf gets deleted because he's the biggest troll here and would love to see this board fall to shit with nothing but owning and stoning.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hedgehog on November 21, 2009, 04:41:34 PM
that already stated.  If he wishes troops dead again, he's gone
Are you gone if you wish the death of certain civilians as well?

Just kinda interested in what type of censorship you were gonna introduce.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 21, 2009, 04:54:55 PM
Are you gone if you wish the death of certain civilians as well?

Just kinda interested in what type of censorship you were gonna introduce.
you wish our troops dead, you're gone.  That crosses the line for a lot of people here hedge.  Did you hear me mention anything else but that?  No I didn't so don't try and change the subject to something that was never in question.  If someone wants to wish troops dead, this is the wrong forum for them.  As far as censorship goes, this forum is actually pretty darn free.  People are even allowed to flood the board with dozens of threads.  We have a thousand times more freedom in what gets posted here than we did in general.  It was pretty routine to see our threads entirely deleted and or merged into one big mess.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Mons Venus on November 23, 2009, 01:42:49 PM

I have brought a tremendous amount of substance, highly relevent articles, and tpoics to this board that otherwise would not be brought up.       
 

You also brought up 2+ year old posts that were taken completely OUT OF CONTEXT which tried to make me appear in favor of killing our soliders. Can you possibly believe that Hugo, Bum, Oz or HH6 would let those comments slide if they thought I was serious? Of course not. Who would? errrr YOU. (2+ years late)

You made something out of NOTHING. Feel better now?



  
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 23, 2009, 02:58:55 PM
Mons- do you want me to post your posts that are the subject of the thread at the top of the page?

BTW - what i posted pales in comparison to what i see from almost everyone else.   
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 23, 2009, 03:01:32 PM
Mons- do you want me to post your posts that are the subject of the thread at the top of the page?

BTW - what i posted pales in comparison to what i see from almost everyone else.   
hahaha, panic...  change subject quickly... panic panic...  3333, you are at least admitting that sometimes your rants are racially motivated right?  That's what it looks like you're saying.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Fury on November 23, 2009, 03:30:21 PM
Because your RANTS are racially motivated. That is abundantly clear.


Racist POS.



You really shouldn't be posting considering that you've been outed as a fake soldier and are on the record saying that you wish 50,000 more American soldiers would die by IED. You're a liar and a shill.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Skip8282 on November 23, 2009, 03:41:38 PM
You also brought up 2+ year old posts that were taken completely OUT OF CONTEXT which tried to make me appear in favor of killing our soliders. Can you possibly believe that Hugo, Bum, Oz or HH6 would let those comments slide if they thought I was serious? Of course not. Who would? errrr YOU. (2+ years late)

You made something out of NOTHING. Feel better now?


Nobody took shit out of context with your nonsense asswipe.  You were caught in multiple lies and you made the comments freely.  Only now that you've been exposed as a POS are you starting to backtrack.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Fury on November 23, 2009, 03:53:05 PM
Seeing as it was deleted, I'll post it again. Mons, you're in no position to attack anyone for their viewpoints. What's worse? Someone making a comment that can be construed as racist or someone saying that they hope 50,000 more American soldiers die by IED attack? That along with the fact that you flat out lied about being a soldier destroys any sort of "credibility" that you had on here.

Why did my post about this get deleted? It's ok for Mons to attack everything about 333 but it's wrong for someone to attack this fake vet?
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Fury on November 23, 2009, 03:54:26 PM
Seeing as it was deleted, I'll post it again. Mons, you're in no position to attack anyone for their viewpoints. What's worse? Someone making a comment that can be construed as racist or someone saying that they hope 50,000 more American soldiers die by IED attack? That along with the fact that you flat out lied about being a soldier destroys any sort of "credibility" that you had on here.

Why are you deleting this, Hugo?
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Fury on November 23, 2009, 03:55:35 PM
Seeing as it was deleted, I'll post it again. Mons, you're in no position to attack anyone for their viewpoints. What's worse? Someone making a comment that can be construed as racist or someone saying that they hope 50,000 more American soldiers die by IED attack? That along with the fact that you flat out lied about being a soldier destroys any sort of "credibility" that you had on here.

Again, why are you deleting this? It's relevant to the thread.

Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 23, 2009, 03:57:45 PM
keep reposting the same post I moved BF and I promise you a ban this time.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 23, 2009, 04:00:19 PM
keep reposting the same post I moved BF and I promise you a ban this time.

Haha, you're pathetic. How is it not relevant to the thread? This fake soldier is attacking 333 about a post that may or may not have been racist. As far as I'm concerned, he's fair game. It's funny how you couldn't care less about the fact that this guy is on the record wishing for 50,000 Americans to die by IED attack but you're up in arms and logging a dozen posts about 333 making an off the cuff comment. Your double standard is pathetic. Why are you a moderator again? This board has gone to shit in the last year.

Mons, what's it like being so stupid that you yourself gave out the information that proved that you were full of shit about being a vet? An F-22 pilot while fighting on the ground in Panama. Amusing.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 23, 2009, 04:02:27 PM
Haha, you're pathetic. How is it not relevant to the thread? This fake soldier is attacking 333 about a post that may or may not have been racist. As far as I'm concerned, he's fair game. It's funny how you couldn't care less about the fact that this guy is on the record wishing for 50,000 Americans to die by IED attack but you're up in arms and logging a dozen posts about 333 making an off the cuff comment. Your double standard is pathetic. Why are you a moderator again? This board has gone to shit in the last year.

Mons, what's it like being so stupid that you yourself gave out the information that proved that you were full of shit about being a vet? An F-22 pilot while fighting on the ground in Panama. Amusing.
fine, ignore me and post it again outside this thread.  You were warned so don't blame me when you get banned for it.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Fury on November 23, 2009, 04:03:02 PM
fine, ignore me and post it again outside this thread.  You were warned so don't blame me when you get banned for it.

This is Ron's board, not yours.  ;)
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 23, 2009, 04:03:54 PM
This is Ron's board, not yours.  ;)
no shit ::)
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 23, 2009, 06:04:54 PM
no shit ::)

Bro, if the best that the haters can do is post one bad one out of 15,000, its ridiculous to label me a racist.

Anout 9 of every 10 posts of mons are idiotic drivel.

Additionally, I will share my thoughts with you a later date on the race issue, I am not in ther mood right now. 

Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Kazan on November 24, 2009, 08:31:40 AM
Bush murdered all those poor soliders w/ his made up 9/11 WMD iraq BS.


Talk to him.

No you see we are talking to you. You may take this shit lightly, but I for one don't. You have posts all over claiming all kinds of shit. Ranger, parent of a soldier, child of a disabled vet, then the latest an AF RIO on what appers to be an F-16. All I have to say is you better not slip up, because if I find so much as your fucking IP address, I will find out who you are.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: chadstallion on November 25, 2009, 11:54:03 AM
what i posted pales in comparison to what i see from almost everyone else.   

not in quantity....
or quality, come to think of it....;)
butt you cut/paste well.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 25, 2009, 11:56:23 AM
not in quantity....
or quality, come to think of it....;)
butt you cut/paste well.

Unreal.  You dont know me that well do you? 
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 25, 2009, 04:56:39 PM
WTF?  How many times has Mons whacked off to posted BF's picture?  Why would you have another mans pic stored on your hard drive?


Well, I guess from you that's something we could expect...
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 26, 2009, 04:46:36 AM

Skip - BF said that is not even him!
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 26, 2009, 06:32:21 AM
Skip - BF said that is not even him!
it's not him.
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: chadstallion on November 26, 2009, 04:27:13 PM
Unreal.  You dont know me that well do you? 
unfortunately i'm learning more and more as i suffer through your posts... ;D
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 27, 2009, 05:54:56 AM
unfortunately i'm learning more and more as i suffer through your posts... ;D

The feeling is mutual. 
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: chadstallion on November 27, 2009, 06:26:03 AM
The feeling is mutual. 

ok, then, our first thing in common!!! ;D
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: Skip8282 on November 27, 2009, 06:58:52 AM
Skip - BF said that is not even him!


it's not him.



Mons found to be lying AGAIN!  Oh the shock, I can't believe it.  Dishonesty from a fake poser?  Who would've gue....Oh wait.

Ever get tired of the lies Mons?  Or is it pathological?
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: Soul Crusher on November 27, 2009, 07:02:44 AM
ok, then, our first thing in common!!! ;D

And that is where any similarity between us ends. 
Title: Re: daily post limit on the politics board
Post by: chadstallion on November 27, 2009, 07:11:12 AM
And that is where any similarity between us ends. 

not so fast, brolly...
we both like our penii pleased.
Title: Re: 333, HH6 VS. Mons
Post by: boonasty on November 27, 2009, 09:35:25 AM
it's not him.

http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/movie-uk-3d61b3d4f4f1fa3c02c447f41457e9c4.html