his entire presidency so far.A living human being would rank somewhere between 0 to 100... You can't rank the Anti Christ on a level achievable by mere mortals.
0-100.
Oops, I can't say that!
Funny considering you're the guy who has to get pissy and bump his own posts to get a response :PCRICKETS
Funny considering you're the guy who has to get pissy and bump his own posts to get a response :P
It worked didn't it?
;D I guess you killed those crickets ;D
I think even a right wing zealot would admit that was pretty funny. ;D
On topic, I rate Bush at approximately a 105 . . .
;D I guess you killed those crickets ;D
Nice . . . we'll look forward to your next visit to our great nation, Ms. Thang.See, Only the Anti Christ would rate higher than human standards... As a deciever, Bush get's over 105... Or he could be God but no way God/Jesus sucks up white lines of coke.
On topic, I rate Bush at approximately a 105 . . .
See, Only the Anti Christ would rate higher than human standards... As a deciever, Bush get's over 105... Or he could be God but no way God/Jesus sucks up white lines of coke.
for all the shit I give you, at least you don't go whining to "Historian Yates" after talking a big game. can't say that about some others on here.expand
expand
nothing much to it really. the great Historian deigns to favor us w his presence once again, and my posts re: jag start disappearing w/o any explanation. The woman likes to start fires, but can't stand any heat . . .Not to start something again so soon because I've enjoyed the semi truce, but did you spam the thread with irrelevant material or stuff that could be taken as racist? Give an example of what got deleted?
Guess I hit too close to home.
his entire presidency so far.
0-100.
1. All the race-related material I've posted has been ironic (i.e., leni riefenstahl pics in your thread about Israel), and I think the regular mods get that, as they have never been deleted to my knowledge.One thing that used to be a frequent technique on getbig was to spam a thread with enough crazy bullshit that it gets deleted... It used to happen all the time and I have to say that is what I thought you were trying to do by not posting opinion and posting pics that would piss off mods. It turned into a flame war and poof.. The thread was deleted... Maybe that's not what you were doing but that's honestly what I thought you were doing so I melted. I don't think your posts should be deleted if you weren't being malicious in an attempt to corrupt Jags post. That is Bullshit if it is as you say. The mods don't necessarily "get it" and they will hit the poof button. Ok, back to the semi-truce ;D I don't want to incure your wrath again soon :P
2. Jag came on and made several posts in the bad hair day thread about how she still has her looks b/c she's never had a child, and having children is apparently what puts you in your grave. So I responded--to keep it brief--that everything has it's place. When you're a 20 y o female, your beauty is part of what you bring to the world . . . when you're 40, one expects a more mature viewpoint, and different kinds of contributions . . . and that if at 40 you think you've still got what a 20 y o has, and take pride in that, then you're delusional . . . which would explain why she missed the boat in terms of moving on w her life. Didn't even use a profanity in my post.
W/in a half hour of posting that, my post was deleted. No explanation, no nothing. I know Stella didn't do it, and BB lets me know when he modifies my posts.
also noted something else deleted today in the Las Vegas thread . . . but that was a little edgier
if you dont like bush thats fine. but give a reason. post some proof of our economy going down, or education, or employment. because you cant. just because your poor, you dont have an education,your cars a piece of shit, or you cant get a job. its nobodys fault but your own lazy ass. and if this isnt the case, what are you bitching about.
if you dont like bush thats fine. but give a reason. post some proof of our economy going down, or education, or employment. because you cant. just because your poor, you dont have an education,your cars a piece of shit, or you cant get a job. its nobodys fault but your own lazy ass. and if this isnt the case, what are you bitching about.This is bast000's thread and he didn't ask for a reason... Maybe he's just trying to get a feel for where people are scoring him and that's it.. People replied to the thread as is... If you don't like it, start your own thread and make demands there. ;D
60%He fired Powell.... fired him......
It would much higher if President Bush would have started his second term with some different players on his team (Powell as VP, and a more capable defense secretary)
Can we use negative numbers? The economy finally started to recover, so at least single digits.
http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
the war doesnt effect the economy
60%
It would much higher if President Bush would have started his second term with some different players on his team (Powell as VP, and a more capable defense secretary)
CRICKETS
I agree. He should have cleaned house a bit. Definitely should have gotten rid of Rumsfeld. Powell as VP would have been great.Do you think someone will be smart enough to choose Powell as a VP (I don't think he'd run for Pres himself, but who knows - that would be outstanding if he did though)?
powell won't run for veep . . . his wife won't let him, and she seems to need a lot of attention.I know. Wishful thinking on my part, right? Who do you like for '08 from the Republican party? Who's a viable candidate from the Democratic party?
I know. Wishful thinking on my part, right? Who do you like for '08 from the Republican party? Who's a viable candidate from the Democratic party?
I know. Wishful thinking on my part, right? Who do you like for '08 from the Republican party? Who's a viable candidate from the Democratic party?
hillary's got the money to be a serious threat.She has serious negatives amongst large portions of the electorate, thus they'll do whatever possible to find someone else.
I know. Wishful thinking on my part, right? Who do you like for '08 from the Republican party? Who's a viable candidate from the Democratic party?
2. Jag came on and made several posts in the bad hair day thread about how she still has her looks b/c she's never had a child, and having children is apparently what puts you in your grave. So I responded--to keep it brief--that everything has it's place. When you're a 20 y o female, your beauty is part of what you bring to the world . . . when you're 40, one expects a more mature viewpoint, and different kinds of contributions . . . and that if at 40 you think you've still got what a 20 y o has, and take pride in that, then you're delusional . . . which would explain why she missed the boat in terms of moving on w her life. Didn't even use a profanity in my post.
W/in a half hour of posting that, my post was deleted. No explanation, no nothing. I know Stella didn't do it, and BB lets me know when he modifies my posts.
also noted something else deleted today in the Las Vegas thread . . . but that was a little edgier
Bottom line is this: You like to hide behind your cloak of anonymity threatening & harassing me despite your knowledge that such activity is illegal, and despite my having asked you to stop. You made numerous intentional & unwarranted personal attacks against another poster in this thread, and now you're crying because your comments were appropriately deleted.
Obama gives a good speech, but I don't know enough about him to say whether or not he'd be a good candidate.
i just found out that i'm going to get to hear and perhaps meet obama in the near future . . . looking forward to it.Let's hope he's less contrived in person. He sounds like an announcer in interviews.
Let's hope he's less contrived in person. He sounds like an announcer in interviews.
if you dont like bush thats fine. but give a reason. post some proof of our economy going down, or education, or employment. because you cant. just because your poor, you dont have an education,your cars a piece of shit, or you cant get a job. its nobodys fault but your own lazy ass. and if this isnt the case, what are you bitching about.great post. the thing that always kills me, is the big fuss being made over the national debt, i could rant for hours on how much of a non-issue it is. these clueless delusional liberals are truly moronic sheep, it disgusts me... shame that such idiots still exist these days.
economically - 92Delusional's a perfect name for you.
militarily - 71
immigration - 12
Delusional's a perfect name for you.how so? please enlighten me, sir.
Delusional's a perfect name for you.
We don't agree on much pump, but i'm with you here. 71-millitarily? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHi should have put 'national security'.
i should have put 'national security'.
economically - 92
national security - 71
immigration - 12
great post. the thing that always kills me, is the big fuss being made over the national debt, i could rant for hours on how much of a non-issue it is.
How do you respond to this?how do i respond: wow. absolutely not. wrong. 665 billion? no, that was in 2004 when the deficit was at its highest ever in history. it's 2006, did you know that?? now the economy is growing faster than the deficit which will be under 250 billion this year, with economic growth at over 400 billion. get with the times.
The United States is currently borrowing $665 billion annually from foreign lenders.
How do you respond to this?
The United States is currently borrowing $665 billion annually from foreign lenders.
I bet you don't know how they'll collect, do ya?
Its all about the Gross National Product which is Trillions...665 billion really doesn't mean a whole hell of alot...well, cant really sustain a deficit like that long term, not at current gross GDP and speed of economic growth, but the deficit now is almost 1 third of that now, with economic growth outpacing it.
militarily - 71
economically - 92
national security - 71Completely the opposite-still plenty of loopholes that should've been addressed long ago.
i should have put 'national security'.Wow, that's a lot of negatives for a delusional liberal ;D
economically - 92
national security - 71
immigration - 12
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/and our economy is growing faster than that debt, its only at 65% of gdp, and shrinking. i can name 10 countries at the top of my head that have higher debt ratio than usa. dont buy into the pessimistic hype.
GAO Chief Warns Economic Disaster Loomssame in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s...USA is doing great and will continue.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061028/D8L1OC5G0.html
Here is our nation's top accountant telling us that very bad times are coming.
maybe currently but because of his spending and putting us in a fuckload of debt no one will be getting social security in the future.again...debt is only at 65% of gdp and shrinking, like i said economy is growing faster than the deficit. italy over 100% germany over 70% japan 170%, saudi arabia over 100%, could go on.... after world war 2 germany was at something like 500% of gdp in debt, USA after world war 2 was at over 100% of GDP. dont buy into the liberal pessimistic hype, doomsdayers are always wrong, especially wrong in this case.
again...debt is only at 65% of gdp and shrinking, like i said economy is growing faster than the deficit. italy over 100% germany over 70% japan 170%, saudi arabia over 100%, could go on.... after world war 2 germany was at something like 500% of gdp in debt, USA after world war 2 was at over 100% of GDP. dont buy into the liberal pessimistic hype, doomsdayers are always wrong, especially wrong in this case.
again...debt is only at 65% of gdp and shrinking, like i said economy is growing faster than the deficit. italy over 100% germany over 70% japan 170%, saudi arabia over 100%, could go on.... after world war 2 germany was at something like 500% of gdp in debt, USA after world war 2 was at over 100% of GDP. dont buy into the liberal pessimistic hype, doomsdayers are always wrong, especially wrong in this case.