Stella is hot
I got this off the Natural board which was a sticky from "natural gallery"!(clearing throat) :-X
(clearing throat) :-X
Ahahahahahah!!! What's that supposed to mean? ;DIt means I Plea the 5th. ;)
It means I Plea the 5th. ;)
hotter than alexxxs sister. ;)
I need proof!
Soemwhere on here there is a website with allot of pics of her. And she is very hot and very nice.
Why is it a good thing she is a god fearing woman? ??? What is so special about having a particular belief system other than community support? STella seems ok but is next to impossible to "debate" with in that religious buffet thread.With all due respect to my guy, Matt C...I don't expect you to understand.
I agree.
I don't expect people who don't believe things without reasons (let's call them "sane people") to understand either.
I don't fall for labels. I know as much or as little about the topic as you - as everyone. Anyone claiming to know these great truths would be classed delusional by any other standard. It's just a double standard with religion because so many people are. Ultimately, no one knows any more or any less than I do. Label me as you will.Remember, kid...'the fool says there is no God'.
Agree with Matt, if you see that as a bonus, you're one delusional f**cker.This is the last time I respond to under 200lb OVER 15% bodyfat trash from Europe who 'sporadically' works-out so...
Unless of course he by that means, a woman should act and behave a certain way (which most of the time benefits the man)
Maybe that 'plains it. ::)
Here you go Kid,
(http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/0618680004.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V54473513_.jpg)
Written by this "fool":
Richard Dawkins, British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science writer who holds the Charles Simonyi Chair for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.
And when you're done reading that you can check out this one:
(http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/067003472X.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V1129949951_.jpg)
Written by this "fool":
Daniel Dennett, a prominent American philosopher. Dennett's research centers on philosophy of mind, philosophy of science and philosophy of biology, particularly as those fields relate to evolutionary biology and cognitive science. He is currently a professor at Tufts University.
::)
Did you start reading those books because of your proclivity for giving oral sex to men? You know Catholicism considers you a sinner and your desire to find reason for why you like it when a man pounds your balloon knot must have been strong considering you are an outcast in the Catholic Church.
Of course you would have fit right in with many Priests and Clergymen.
This is the last time I respond to under 200lb OVER 15% bodyfat trash from Europe who 'sporadically' works-out so...
Bluto, of COURSE you agree with Matt C. He countered one of MY statements. It isn't like you're going to take my side. Like you have any fkn clue. Now go get your fkn SHINE BOX, baby...my shoes are downstairs in the 'Y'. I like em' squeaky CLEAN!
With all due respect to my guy, Matt C...I don't expect you to understand.
Some will understand and see that as a major bonus...some will not.
Gee, I've never mentioned my weight or bodyfat on here, but thanks for your interest! As for Europe, that's correct. I'm from "Europe" (meaning I could be from Paris - or London, Prague - or Barcelona, Oslo - or Geneva) yeah these cities, and countries, has SO much in common ::)Scary!
As for training 'sporadically' I wouldn't call working out several times a week for 10+ years 'sporadically' but then english is not my first language ;)
I'll side with anyone who I agree with. I don't belong to a camp, I don't kiss upp to a group of people - unlike certain other people I know.
BTW, since you mentioned the Y board, how's your "vision" going? I saw you got a whopping 4 posts or so in total today, keep it going! Hard work pays off! ;D
Oh uh, you ended up coming back and posting when you said you wouldn't - boo-hoo!I coulnt resist!
;D
Ahahahahahah!!! What's that supposed to mean? ;D
Yeah! What's that supposed to mean?
That lady wasn't me but maybe the thread is gone because she was 1/2 nude. Or maybe whoever deleted it thought it was me.
also, where did arvilla's thread go? judging by the neck and hair in that picture, it was obviously her.
Yeah PowerRod, you nailed it - you mentioned qualities exlusive to christianity ::)
I'm curious about the "stand by your man" part though.
hey homo, i said it's not exclusive. read the last part then get back to your disco.
I know that's why I was being sarcastic. Since it's not exlusive, it's pretty worthless to mention.
But I hear you, you're the typical conservative christian, woman should know her place and all that bullshit.
hey homo, i said it's not exclusive. read the last part then get back to your disco.Ignore him, PowerRod. Women should know their place and role as should men.
What do you care? You're an admitted virgin who spends his weekends trolling Getbig.
It's cute with your typical talk for a teenager - it's all partying, calling people virgins etc. sounds like quotes from one of those old College movies.
When you become older you will look back and laugh at how immature you were :)
You're the biggest troll on this site. You were already removed from the Player board for knowing nothing about women or anything cool in life. On top of that you admitted to not working out and being a virgin.hahahahaha, "bluto" is quite the winner.
hahahahaha, "bluto" is quite the winner.
Ignore him, PowerRod. Women should know their place and role as should men.
You're gonna argue with a guy from Europe who doesnt have women, doesnt train nor anything outside of post on Getbig.com
This is his life. I only post while at work. It's RARE I post when I'm not.
You're the biggest troll on this site. You were already removed from the Player board for knowing nothing about women or anything cool in life. On top of that you admitted to not working out and being a virgin.
I dont think she likes Sicilian kids from Ohio, BASTucci.
Keep your money on BEAST.
EXCELLENT post, Power Rod! You nailed it.
haha is she gonna be working for that nonsense supplement company booth at the AC?
u gonna make a move?
if i go to the AC it won't be to get autographs from jay cutler. brother ahhah oh man
Ignore him, PowerRod. Women should know their place and role as should men.
You're gonna argue with a guy from Europe who doesnt have women, doesnt train nor anything outside of post on Getbig.com
This is his life. I only post while at work. It's RARE I post when I'm not.
thats the spirit.
nail the beast hard bro.
do you still read your wife's girly magazines in the toilet first thing in the mornings?
monster ruining it for me by getting her scared when she reads your post.
yes!!!!!
do you still your boyfriends playgirl? ::)
d to the p, you can do better than that..step your game up 'gansta'
I agree.
I don't expect people who don't believe things without reasons (let's call them "sane people") to understand either.
Here you go Kid,
(http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/0618680004.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V54473513_.jpg)
Written by this "fool":
Richard Dawkins, British ethologist, evolutionary biologist and popular science writer who holds the Charles Simonyi Chair for the Public Understanding of Science at Oxford University.
And when you're done reading that you can check out this one:
(http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/067003472X.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_V1129949951_.jpg)
Written by this "fool":
Daniel Dennett, a prominent American philosopher. Dennett's research centers on philosophy of mind, philosophy of science and philosophy of biology, particularly as those fields relate to evolutionary biology and cognitive science. He is currently a professor at Tufts University.
::)
there are reasons for her beleifs, what are the good reasons for your belief. i hate closed minded people, im open to all sorts of new views. again what are the good reasons for your belief? i dont expect a good answer so dont worry if your answer leaves alot to the imagination for secular humanists.
here is a short list of people who beleive in god, by yours truly, i think you might reconize some of the names
albert einstein
newton
planck
eddington
haisch
polkinghome
dyson
wilber
aquinas
hmm.. seems like a good list, but it doesnt prove shit either way, this is a dumb mans argument. i do enjoy matt c's atheist rants.
Atheism is as closed minded as any religion. By ruling out even the possibility of there being a God, gods, higher power, or whatever you've closed your mind off to soo much. I'm not going to say I back any religion in particular, but it seems to me to be so intent on believing there is nothing, it takes as much faith as those you accuse who believe in something. I could understand being an atheist and just living your life with an absence, but what is the point of going around preaching it like it's become a religion of its own. It seems like a waste too, being the ultimate lose-lose situation. If you're right, you won't conclusively find out until you're dead, in which case there's nothing and you've won no big prize for you belief, and if you're wrong you're going to hell. But, believe what you want, I'm not trying to push any particular religion, I'm just giving my opinion on it.
Whatabout Santa?Well, then you could go to the North Pole or wherever, notice the distinct lack of toys, workshops, and happy go lucky elves. But that's like saying 'I'm not going to accept the possibility that there could be a higher power because you can't prove it.' You also can't prove there isn't, so why not just leave all options open and at least be agnostic?
Actually that's a pretty bad list. Howabout dropping some current names instead of Aquinas who lived 700 years ago ::)
Fact is, religion has taken a big beating in recent years and it's getting really hard to find people of intelligence that also are religious.
well i guess talking about hot woman isnt fun we need pics!!!
anyone got any pics of alexxs sister, heard she was hot.
ahha, this post shows your intelligence, about 80% of the population beleive in some form of divinity, you do the math on if that 80% contains intelligent people. 40% percent of scientists believe in god.
polkinghome is still alive so it, dyson, jastrow, hugh ross, gingereich, wilber, haisch.
the santa argument is not a good argument, for the simple reason belief in him requires that you beleive someone climbs down your chimmny at night and puts out gifts.
god on the other hand is valid, since there are moral arguments, consciousnous argument, what came before the big bang, uncaused cause, unmoved mover, anthropic arguments and more but i doubt you've read any of them and base your opinions on "i dont see god". im not talking about christianity, im talking about beleif in god, i dont buy chrisitanity, i possibly could but for now it doesnt seem logical to me.
im not trying to name drop, you provided dennett and dawkins who are involved with evolutionary matters which have no part in spiritual matters, more then mowing the lawn and skining.
if less intelligence equals belief in god(just belief in god, not a christian god) then why could i own you in a debate about the subject. i would extend that to any athiest on this board. i enjoy the debate, and dont mind arguing about it.
Jeez,where can you find great pic like this....I was about to die for excesive laugh.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=119712.0;attach=135547;image)
You are all arguing in different directions. I am not an atheist, I do believe absloute certain "faith" in something you can't prove is useful and comforting to many on a spiritual level however to use that same absolute certain "faith" with no evidentiary basis to create domestic and foreign policy and to use "faith" when going into a voting booth, is just absolutley dangerous and unethical and highly immmoral.Exactly, I don't remember who the quote was from but it was 'faith without doubt is dead faith'. There's not much we can conclusively prove as true and as soon as we eliminate options that you can't disprove, you slip out of having faith into just being ignorant.
You all have a responsiblity to the world and to its people in making sound judgements based on the best facts and knowledge of the day. Believing that another group of people are evil and not going to heaven because your good book tells you so is just plain immoral, dangerous and complelety lacking in ethics.
The extremist Muslims hate us because we are none believers and extremist Christians hate Muslims because they are non believers. If you take the literal word of both the Bible and Quran then all non-believers should be converted or killed for "God". Both are so certain their faith is the right faith.
And Zionists believe God will come when the Jews are back in the holy land, but the Jews think God will chose them and the Christians think Christ will choose them. Someones gotta be wrong. But people of "faith" cannot be reasoned with.
You see people its all unprovable and we are in the midst of a Holy war here and abroad because people have absolute certain "faith" that they are the right ones and God has chosen them. Meanwhile children are being killed and maimed because you are all so certain you are right. Could it be that you are all wrong?.
The answer is in "doubt", not "faith", "Doubt" is good, Doubt means we will keep striving for the truth and for what is best in the here and now using just our minds and our hearts. When people start having faith with no evidence, we are all in big trouble dudes.
It is only a matter of time before some person of absolute certain faith gets his hands on a nuclear bomb. God help us all.
can anyone name me a religion that doesnt have a concept of an afterlife or reincarnation?Then how do you explain suicide bombers? They gladly die to go see Allah, doesn't seem like a fear of dying to me. Not even accepting the possibility of there being a higher power is as childishly closed minded and faith based as any religion. Believe it or not, science has become a religion of it's own.
belief in god stems from a) the unknown b) fear of death
a) is shrinking exponentially with the advances of science, and b) may be obsolete one day as well..
people are gonan believe what they want, but the concept of a "god" is transparent and childish
lolWell, not to just kill themselves, but they obviously have no fear of dying. But at the same time it seems ridiculous there are many atheists because they simply don't want to believe there could be something else greater than them. Just because you do or don't want to believe in something won't make it anymore or any less true. For example, gravity. Every single one of you have felt the effects of gravity, but no one has ever seen, touched, tasted, heard, smelled, or seen, gravity. There's no denying it exists though. Just because something exists beyond our own senses, doesn't mean it can't exist. Either way, higher power or not, there will never come a day when someone can conclusively write on a piece of paper how there could or could not be a higher power which leaves us to have faith that whatever belief we have is correct and seek as much proof as we can to reaffirm that faith.
um they dont do it to kill themselves, they do it to get into heaven with 72 virgins
by fear of death i mean the fear of actual death (ie no heaven or hell when you die thats it)
lol ... you "feel" god ... how very scientific of you ;DSo by not being able to prove there is something, you can take that and conclusively believe there is nothing? All I'm trying to point out is that if you're going to say religion looks over certain possibilities, then you have to admit atheism does too. accepting every single possibility would be the only truly 'open-minded' choice, but at some point you have to pick one and close off to something. And like I pointed out, you can't prove gravity either, but what would you say if someone told you it couldn't exist because it can't be proven.
nobody could ever write on a piece of paper that the universe wasnt created by a giant bleeding tampon either ... nobody can prove there is no santa or no easter bunny
you dig?
those terrorists dont fear death because they have heaven waiting for them ... you inadvertantly just proved the point i was making
i wouldn't argue with sandy canada this guys dumber then a sack of cock rings. seriously he cant even comprehend that it is a fact that all that is, HAS to be eternal and infinite. what created the universe sandy, or better yet why did the big bang change, or explode?. you see you have two options since you dont know much about cosmology ill lay them out. the big bang was a point of infinite density for eternity or you can keep going back till theres nothing, that is before the planck epoch. they are the only really acceptable answers in science. multiverse just pushes the question back(matter is not eternal). say you choose option two(since ive already schooled you on the nothing to something argument) then the big bang has been a infinitly dense spot for eternity with all the conditions present for expansion for eternity. why did it all of a sudden change if the conditions were always present? we cant measure the time back to the planck epoch. change with when the conditions are present is a willful act something purposeful ie god.Again, brilliant. At some point in time, everything must have been created somehow. God doesn't have to be the answer to why, maybe just the answer to how, to keep the possibilities religion neutral. Obviously everything couldn't have come from nothing. Would you say the LAWS of thermodynamics are wrong then?
why is the universe just right? the antropic argument, dont say its just right because we are here to talk about it, that is not acceptable by science and is a cop out. they can test the universe using computer models for other parameters, this paremeter which is impossible by chance according to statistics is the only possible outcome for life to exist.
belief in god is not childish being ignorant and clinging to your beliefs with no arguments for them other then blind faith is childish. provide some arguments. you can make the assumption that we all fear death and beleive in god but i was probably dead for a few million years and it didnt seem to bother me.
New views? There's nothing new with being a conservative christian! As for Blockhead, he likes for women to have their place, because he, as a man would benefit from it.
Again, brilliant. At some point in time, everything must have been created somehow. God doesn't have to be the answer to why, maybe just the answer to how, to keep the possibilities religion neutral. Obviously everything couldn't have come from nothing. Would you say the LAWS of thermodynamics are wrong then?
Of course. Maybe in Bulgaria or wherever you're from people get married to harm themselves, not benefit from it. You are not "teh smart".
I want to benefit from my wife, and I want her to benefit from me. If you think an "obedient" woman (one who'll adhere to my strict demands, such as not blowing my neighbor when i'm at work) is in shackles by being in that state...well, more power to you.
Oh, and a tip to you Bluto, since apparently, you're a virgin: women don't want someone who thinks like you, believe it or not. "women are great, ha ha, don't go against them, you're such a meanie male". I'd put you together with the likes of Chadwick Mower, and see how far that got him?
lol ... you "feel" god ... how very scientific of you ;D
one thing that is not a joke is alexxs sisters ass. you see that thing?
im not asking you to prove god does not exist, im asking for logical arguments against the exsistence of god. there are some, like the problem of evil, why suffering, why no miracles etc.The problem of evil? ie, if God is so good why did He create evil? Well think about it. What is dark? Darkness is the absence of light, you don't 'turn on the dark' you 'turn off the light'. So, evil is merely the absence of good.Why no miracles? Well, what has anyone done that could put God in their debt? What have you done that makes God owe you one. No miracles...it all depends on where you look.
The problem of evil? ie, if God is so good why did He create evil? Well think about it. What is dark? Darkness is the absence of light, you don't 'turn on the dark' you 'turn off the light'. So, evil is merely the absence of good.Why no miracles? Well, what has anyone done that could put God in their debt? What have you done that makes God owe you one. No miracles...it all depends on where you look.
i hear you, i have answers to these arguments, im just playing devils advocate. i dont think god created evil. god gave us free will and choice. from that choice we can do whatever we want, thus bad things will and can happen because of the seperation with god. if god controlled us, then love etc could not truly occur. therefore the only way for exsistence to matter is for seperation to occur and for us to make decisions. funny that we label things good and bad, for some reason we morality, and materialism cant explain it.Ah, gotcha, well, you've definately made some statements I respect.