If Ronnie was transplanted from our era into the seventies (using just 70's deca, primo, and dianobol), I would say that Arnold would win the pose. Along with, at least, the side chest.
The better comparison is drop Ronnie down to a pound-for-pound weight and see how well he compares to Arnold , lets drop Ronnie down to about 225 pounds and see how impressive he is compared to Arnold
why don't we drop arnold's height down by 4 inches to equal Ronnie's while we are at it? ::)
thats a whole lot less mass relative to height.
Ronnie is on about ten times more drugs than Arnold in that pic. Give Arnold some Tren, Supension, GH, Insulin, and Clen, and you would be shocked at how much of a difference it would make.
Ronnie is on about ten times more drugs than Arnold in that pic. Give Arnold some Tren, Supension, GH, and Clen, and you would be shocked how much of a difference it would make.
Arnold 75 VS Ronnie 98 lol
don't even start your ironage crap here.
true.What makes you say that Arnold is more aesthetic... by those pictures Ronnie looks far more sensational... perhaps in that very shot right there is the greatest X frame we have ever seen in that shot Ronnie arms are so large that his waist appears tapered due to the appearance of clear obliques not seen in many Coleman shots... once again quad seperation is evident with the X frame highlighted by the intimidating size and definition of the hamstrings. Aesthetics is right there in ya face only thing that stops you guys from admitting his aesthetic presence is the huge amount of muscle but ill tell you that its all in the right places. Only flaw, is calves... and that it! Amazing shot Hulkster i'm so damn impressed by the clean lines I don't see how Arnold is more aesthetic but that is something that is subjective as by definition aesthetics is a reference to beauty.
Arnold was more aesthetic than Ronnie, but Ronnie's arms were a whole lot better..
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery6/mg126.jpg)
What makes you say that Arnold is more aesthetic... by those pictures Ronnie looks far more sensational... perhaps in that very shot right there is the greatest X frame we have ever seen in that shot Ronnie arms are so large that his waist appears tapered due to the appearance of clear obliques not seen in many Coleman shots... once again quad seperation is evident with the X frame highlighted by the intimidating size and definition of the hamstrings. Aesthetics is right there in ya face only thing that stops you guys from admitting his aesthetic presence is the huge amount of muscle but ill tell you that its all in the right places. Only flaw, is calves... and that it! Amazing shot Hulkster i'm so damn impressed by the clean lines I don't see how Arnold is more aesthetic but that is something that is subjective as by definition aesthetics is a reference to beauty.
LMFAO at Ronnie being aesthetic , hell Arnold wasn't even aesthetic but he certainly more so than RonnieHow is this not aesthetic?
How is this not aesthetic?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=121458.0;attach=136747;image)
How is this not aesthetic?
if Arnold posed how you're supposed to in the front double biceps (standing straight up, no twisting, facing the judges) then Ronnie destroys Arnold.You mean if Ronnie posed how you are supposed to in the front double bi Arnold would destroy him.... but then again i don't think ronnie is capable of twisting his fat waist.
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Ronnie%20Coleman/ArnoldvsRonnie1.jpg)
because he's a collection of parts that lack harmony and balance & proportions , calves , abdominals and delts are all aesthetic muscles Ronnie is lacking in two of areas couple that with the fore mentioned and its easy to see why thats NOT aesthetic , Flex Wheeler yes , Ronnie Coleman give me a breakI see your point - the lack of calves ruins all proportions along with the gyno but there are extreme aesthetic qualities but upon review the flow is not evident particulary due to a missing bodypart.
Arnold 75 VS Ronnie 98 lol
Yawn
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=121458.0;attach=136754;image)
little girl, get out of here with that photoshoped nonsense. Can't you tell Arnold has been shoped?
LMFAO I was waiting for the countdown to the excuses and thanks for meeting the deadline , Arnold is the King of Bodybuilding
NOT photoshopped
if Arnold posed how you're supposed to in the front double biceps (standing straight up, no twisting, facing the judges) then Ronnie destroys Arnold.
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Ronnie%20Coleman/ArnoldvsRonnie1.jpg)
consider yourself owned. ;)
Jojo a little to late
ha ha ha ha, wtf does that have to do with the pic you posted? It's an entirely different shot. I put the pic you posted next to the original to compare. It's obvious Arnold's been photoshoped.
Ronnie's nipples are looking East to West but that good ole boy could sure suck dick. He was the Weider bag boy for 10 years and by god did Joe , Betty and Ben enjoy him. Unfortunately he became impotent last year hence his loss......
LMFAO I was waiting for the countdown to the excuses and thanks for meeting the deadline , Arnold is the King of Bodybuilding
It has nothing to do with it I never claimed it wasn't photoshopped , I recall someone made this comparison I did a quick Google search and posted it and to be honest with you I didn't even look at it and notice it was photoshopped , I could care less that it is , that other shot isn't
singing a different tune now are we after I caught you using a photoshoped pic of Arnold? ;)
It would be something if I photoshopped than pic and tried to pass it off as real but like many times before kid you haven't been able to catch me
I caught you passing off a photoshoped pic of Arnold as real, and now you're trying to weasel your way out of it. You went from "get out of here with your false accusations of photoshop" to "well, I honestly did not know it was photoshoped otherwise I wouldn't have posted it." ;)
How desperate are you? lol this is what you're working with? yawn Neo keep trying
yawn, I don't have to try. I already caught you. ;)
Yawn
ND is such an idiot
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery1/m47.jpg)(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/coleman/rc230.jpg)
WOW Ronnie has the same size calves as Arnold lol
considering that he was 4 inches shorter but still almost 20 pounds heavier at his 99 best, I would not be surprised.
think about it:
4 inches smaller in height but still more massive by almost 20 pounds.
thats an insane mass difference we are talking about here:
Thats Ronnie 2004 and try and convince yourself Ronnie's calves are the same size as Arnolds because you're not convincing me ;)
Thats Ronnie 2004 and try and convince yourself Ronnie's calves are the same size as Arnolds because you're not convincing me ;)
no one ever said you were smart.
you have demonstrated this time and time again...
by the way, hows the climb going?:
LOL
LMFAO I was waiting for the countdown to the excuses and thanks for meeting the deadline , Arnold is the King of Bodybuilding
NOT photoshopped ;)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery1/m47.jpg)(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/coleman/rc230.jpg)
Someone shop that pic of arnie and give us an idea of what he'd look like on todays shit, ship it.
Arnold didn't focus on quads. Nobody really did until Platz came around.
true.
Ronnie's quads destroy Arnolds in every way, shape and form.
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery2/xmg116.jpg)
No GH, No Slin.... Just superior Genetics and Work Ethic, making that overfed ape look inferior in every way.
Post a Ronnie side chest that can even come close to this.I want to know how arnold would have shrinked when he went down same level of bodyfat as ronnies bodyfat.
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery1/ga43.jpg)
think about it:
4 inches smaller in height but still more massive by almost 20 pounds.
thats an insane mass difference we are talking about here:
(http://ifbbtv.com/video3/ronnie_arnold.jpg)
ronnie's side chest was not too shabby,If you want bring the best Sidechest of ronnie,bring it from his first Russian GP.That shocked me a lot.
ND you really are a pathetic piece of shit
ND you really are a pathetic piece of shit
she was probably a well informed Ronnie fan who knew dorian could not even come close 8)
"Swallowing mass amounts of weider spunk goes a long way. Yeah, buddy!" - 8-time Mr. Olympia Ronnie Coleman
we all know dorian was a beaten man in 94 and 97.
swallowing mass amounts of weider spunk goes a long way :-X
yes, he was an 8 time Mr. Olympia. Thats way better than being a lowly 6 time Mr. Olympia 8)
lowly? typical Coleman fan equates quantity with quality , Ronnie beat guys that never stood a chance against Dorian and Dorian faced them when they were in their primes , 1998 an oil-filled Flex who was NO WHERE near his 1993 , almost beat Ronnie in one of the closest Mr Olympia ever by just 3 points , and since Yates retied the quality of field dropped off the face of the map lol two more Mr Olympia titles over who? Dexter & Cutler lol give me a break
but you overlook the fact that dorian should not have won in 94 and by your own admission 97.
so your entire argument is wrong.
exactly. If you personally felt dorian should have lost then you can't go on and on about how he dominated.
you can't have it both ways, genius.
Straight firsts means he dominated genius ;)
but its obvious that he should not have. Even you can see this.
so you can't have it both ways.
either you agree with the judges 100% or you think that at least some of the time, their judging was flawed.
you fall into this second catagory.
I don't think Nasser beat Dorian
yes you do.
you have said it many times in the past.
you cant turn around and change your story just because you got caught in a fallacy. ::)
What are you high? I never said Nasser beat Yates ever , I've said Nasser could match or even beat Yates from the front but NOT from the back & sides , I dare you to find me where I ever said Nasser out right beat Dorian in a contest it can't be done ;)
you have many times referring to the 1997 Mr. O.
I will find them and quote you.
I caught you passing off a photoshoped pic of Arnold as real, and now you're trying to weasel your way out of it. Your attitude went from "get out of here with your false accusations of photoshop" to "well, I honestly did not know it was photoshoped otherwise I wouldn't have posted it." ;)
Like I caught you back-peddling at the truce thread, and then owned your ass brutally? You are truly a worthless little shit, Sperm.
yawn, all talk and no show. Where did I back-peddle? Show me where you owned me. All you do is post strawman after strawman, then attack them and say you owned me. I stopped responding to you after a while b/c your posts became so retarded that anyone could see you were talking out of your ass.
I stopped responding to you after a while b/c your posts became so retarded that anyone could see you were talking out of your ass.
Keep telling that to yourself. Even Pobrecito, who by the way doesen't like me very much, pointed out that I owned you when it comes to your moronic claims about the the difference in mass between Dorian and the 2001 ASC Ronnie. You stopped responding because you got owned and you know it. ;)
SUCKMYMUSCLE
Neo said Ronnie 2001 had the same size as 1999 and equal conditioning in 1998 lol 244 pounds now equals 257?
You back-peddled and I owned you when you said that you were talkig about the 2001 ASC Ronnie having muscles that looked bigger than Dorian's, when in reality you were talking about lean body mass. The evidence? Otherwise, you wouldn't have brought up how Dorian's supposedly larger gut and heaier bone structure added to his bodyweight. This is also true for the speculation about the 1999 Ronnie's vs Dorian's back mass ad width. Me owning you is so commonplace that I am appalled that you have the audacity to keep your high-horse attitude when you have been bitch-slapped by me en absurdum. And by the way, it's not a "strawman" just because I don't quote your exact words; that's your strawman! I don't need to quote the exact words because it doesen't chage the meaning regardless. Sperm, you are a moron.
Keep telling that to yourself. Even Pobrecito, who by the way doesen't like me very much, pointed out that I owned you when it comes to your moronic claims about the the difference in mass between Dorian and the 2001 ASC Ronnie. You stopped responding because you got owned and you know it.
I want to know how arnold would have shrinked when he went down same level of bodyfat as ronnies bodyfat.
You hold the unique distinction of being the only person in the truce thread to get owned by both sides of the debate. Several people have commented that your posts, although lengthy, are full of crap that is easily refuted upon second glance.
ha ha ha ha, I'm still waiting for you to post my quote where I said that. I don't remember exactly what I said. So it's impossible for me to comment on something you 'think' I said. For all I know, I could have said that 01 ASC Ronnie had nearly equal lean mass (I was comparing him to 93 Dorian). Ronnie weighed only 10-13 lbs less depending on which source you read. Considering that his thighs were noticeably smaller in 01, it's probable that most of the loss in lean mass came from his quads while the rest of him maintained the same size as 99. You have to remember this is 2 yrs AFTER the 99 Mr. Olympia. Ronnie has stated that he adds roughly 5 lbs of muscle every year. Are you honestly trying to tell me (and this is how I know you are talking out of your ass) that Ronnie didn't add a single lb of muscle in that time? Do you really believe that he actually shrunk from 99 to 01? ::)
"keep telling that to yourself?" Oh please, get out of here with that shit. You say that like I really have to convince myself that you spew misinformation from your mouth. You hold the unique distinction of being the only person in the truce thread to get owned by both sides of the debate. Several people have commented that your posts, although lengthy, are full of crap that is easily refuted upon second glance.
The fact that he added muscular bodyweight is improbable, since he was lighter at the 2001 ASC than at the 1999 Olympia. Unless he had tons of bodyfat at the 1999 Olympia, it is impossible for him to have gained muscular bodyweight from 1999 to 2001 and yet lost bodyweight. Where did the loss of bodyfat come from then, you Cuban son of a c.u.n.t.
We have been already over this. Just because a muscle looks bigger, it doesen't mean that it actually is. If you got the tape measurer and compared the 2001 ASC Ronnie's measurements to that of either the 1993 or 95 Dorian, you would see that Dorian's measurements were mostly bigger than Ronnie's. Coleman's muscles look bigger than they are because:
The only way I would take your argument seriously is if Dorian's midsection and skeletal frame truly weighted more than Dorian's. Unfortunately for you, even the 2001 ASC Ronnie had a gut distension that was, at the very least, as bad as that of the 1995 Dorian - but probably worse. As for the skeletal frame, there you go picking at straws to try to walk yourself out of your embarassing proposition. The difference is very small, and odds are that Ronnie's frame weights more anyways.
how pathetic!!! You know you've already won when your opponent resorts to personal attacks. ::)
all talk and no show. That seems to be the theme with your posts. I've asked the Dorian nuthuggers repeatedly where Dorian was bigger than Ronnie besides the calves and midsection. So far nobody has been able to answer me. I contend that 01 ASC Ronnie had bigger arms, delts, pecs, and glutes. Please note that I'm comparing him to 93 Dorian. Their backs and thighs were tied in size, and Ronnie's conditioning may even have exceeded Dorian's (I feel that 01 ASC matched Dorian's best ever conditioning in 95).
Both had distended stomachs. However, Dorian also had a wider waist that increased the total volume of his midsection. You must realize the abdomen is not some hollow cavity filled with gas. There are organs and muscles inside, which add weight. Dorian also carried more skeletal mass. He has a larger rib cage, wider hips and thicker joints. Now factor in Ronnie's downsized quads. It's easy to see where most of the 10-13 lbs difference came from.
Like you calling others "dipshit"? ;)
Now seriously, let me get this straight. You're saying that Ronnie gained 5 lbs of mass from 1999 on. So, he was carrying 10 lbs more of mass at the 2001 ASC, and yet his bodyweight was 13 lbs lower. This means that he lost 26 lbs of body mass other than muscle for your hypothesis to be true. Where did this come from? Ronnie was already very lean and depleted in 1999, so his incredible drop of body mass could not possibly be explained by a decrease in either fat or water - only a few pounds could be explained by that. Furthermore, since the weight of the internal organs and bones is stable, the decrease in bodyweight could not have come from anywhere else.
I have already explained where Dorian was bigger: in all the same bodyparts you've just mentioned, except glutes. One more time, just because it looks like Ronnie is bigger on those bodyparts, it doesen't mean he is. The tape measuere is the only arbitrer here. By the way, you were talking about lean body mass, not visual size. Muscle weights more than water, and Ronnie has more water both outside and inside his muscles. You're just dumb if you think that looking at a muscle is an accurate way to measure it's size, let alone the amount of lean body mass contained there. I cannot take seriously your hypothesis that Dorian had greater weight only on calves and midsection. This is especially true considering that Ronnie had the bigger midsection, and that calves represent only about 5% of the body's muscle mass. Skeletal frame is a stretch.
But Ronnie's stomach was far more distended. Which means that his iternal organs were bigger. And Dorian's frame might be bigger, but his bones are likely lighter, so that's picking at straws. Black Men have an average of 50% more Calcium density than White Men, so I bet Ronnie's frame added more weight to the scales than Dorian's. This means more of Dorian's lean bodyweight was muscle tissue.
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Ronnie%20Coleman/ArnoldvsRonnie1.jpg)arnold had both eye-popping size and amazing shape.it would be awesome to have a body like arnies.his body was more than perfect
If you take away the conditioning, cos Ronnie's used a lot more chemicals to get it, this is what I see:-
Pecs - Arnold - Thicker
Bi's - Arnold - More mass, just (Tough one, Ronnie's got separation but maybe Arnold would have with the better conditioning)
Tri's - Ronnie - Easy, far more mass
Lat's - Draw - Ronnie's got the size, but Arnold's have a nicer shape and sweep to them.
Abs - Arnold - No distension
Quads - Ronnie - Far more mass and good separation
Calves - Arnold - Better shape and size
Arnold wins 4:2 ;D
At the end of the day though, it all depends who's looking. I like a more classical shape, whereas others just want eye-popping size. Each to their own. ;)
arnold had both eye-popping size and amazing shape.it would be awesome to have a body like arnies.his body was more than perfect
Ronnie is on about ten times more drugs than Arnold in that pic. Give Arnold some Tren, Supension, GH, Insulin, and Clen, and you would be shocked at how much of a difference it would make.
spare me your winks, you fagg*t. There's a big difference between calling someone a "dipshit" and a "Cuban son of a c.u.n.t." Apparently, you are too stupid to realize this.
I never claimed that Ronnie gained 10 lbs of lean mass from 99 to 01. I was merely pointing out that it's very unlikely that he carried less muscle than in 99. I already explained to you where the difference in weight probably came from.
Do you honestly believe that 93 Dorian had bigger arms and legs than 01 ASC Ronnie,
or that his delts and pecs were larger? ???
In fact, this question is so uninteresting that I feel the need to immediately reframe it...damn you went there!!!!!
Who scored the hotter chick?
(http://www.superiorpics.com/pictures3/Shriver_sd543837.jpg)
(http://www.bodybuilders.com/gates6.jpg)
I'll call you whatever I want to, and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. This is evident by the fact that you reported one of my posts to the mods some time ago, trying to get me banned or in time out, and it didn't work. I called you that because all Cuban Women are whores. When I went to Havana three years ago, there was a statistic that something like 70% of them sell themselves to gringos. I certainly screwed many of them. So it is reasonable to assume that your mother is a prostitute, or has worked in prostitution at some given time - statistically likely.
Bullshit. You did, in fact, say that Ronnie put on 5 lbs of muscle mass per year. Then logically, he would have carried 10 lbs of muscle more in 2001 than 1999. Since he was actually 13 lbs lighter in 2001, it means that he must have lost 23 lbs elsewhere - for your idiotic theory to be correct. Since Ronnie was already at 3% bodyfat in 1999, and since the weight of bones and organs is stable, where were these 23 lbs lost from? He was dryer in 2001, grated, but no oe carries 23 lbs of subcutaneous water. Your argument is just retarded and I exposed you for the intellectual train wreck that you truly are.
I think he did. But I could be wrong. Regardless, this has nothing to do with the issue at hand. Posting pics is irrelevant since you claimed that Ronnie carried more lean mass, and not that his muscles looked bigger. The fact that Ronnie's bodyparts look bigger to you has no relevance i establishing measurements, let alone amout of muscle mass contaied i such bodyparts. If Ronnie's arms were 22" in 1999 and he was 13 lbs lighter in 2001, it is reasonable to expect that Ronnie's arms were around 21" in 2001. The same as Dorian. And even if Dorian's arms were smaller in measurement, it still doese't tell aythig about who carries the most lean muscle tissue. I would have no problem with your argument if you had just said that Ronnie's muscles looked bigger to you; the problem is that you tried to establish causality between this visual assesment and actual amount of muscle tissue. Correlation does not equate causality. There are many confounding variable here, but logic tells me that Dorian carried the most muscle mass.
Ronnie's conditioning at the 01 ASC tied Dorian's best ever conditioning.
ha ha ha ha, you'll call me whatever you want to? Go ahead if you want to sound like a fool. I'm not stopping you. Furthermore, my mom is not Cuban. My dad is. So there goes the rest of your comment.
bullshit what? I said that Ronnie stated he adds roughly 5 lbs of muscle every year. Nowhere did I say that he did in fact gain that much muscle from 99 to 01. Again, your post contains nothing but lies and misinformation. Why am I not surprised? ::)
Ronnie's conditioning at the 01 ASC tied Dorian's best ever conditioning. This means he carried just as much, if not less, fat and water than 93 Dorian.
Ronnie's quads were also downsized from previous years. His chest may have been slightly less full too. Less fat and less water plus smaller quads = most of the 10-13 lbs difference from 99.
The rest of him was visibly the same size as before. His muscles may have been smaller due to less intracellular water, but the difference is so minuscule that you cannot tell.
pfftttt hahahaha....put the pipe down kid
Then why did you bring this up, retard? You were obviously trying to imply that Ronnie gained that amount of muscle, to susbstantiate your claims that Ronnie had bigger delts, chest, etc. Boring.
This is impossible. Both were around 3% bodyfat, and while Ronnie might have been as dry as Dorian in terms of extracellular water - I'm being very generous-, he certainly had more of it insdide his muscles because they were always fuller. Regardless, I think Dorian was drier. But let's pretend they were equal in this regard. First, it is not relevant where the lean body mass is located, since we're evaluating total lean body mass. If Ronnie had bigger delts and chest and yet smaller quads, this does nothing to explain the 13 lbs difference: again, the fact remains that Dorian weights 13 lbs more with similar fat and water levels. 13 lbs of bones is impossible, and Ronnie's frame is very likely heavier. The gut distension is worse on Ronnie, so that can't be it. Now, let's pretend that Dorian did carry 13 more of gut and bones than Ronnie - not true, but let's assume. This still does nothing to prove that Ronnie had more lean mass, as they would be equal.
I already told you why, dipshit. Pay attention instead of flapping your gums. Maybe next time I won't have to repeat myself. I was merely pointing out that it's very unlikely 01 ASC Ronnie carried less muscle than in 99, like you suggest. I never claimed that he did in fact gain 10 lbs of lean mass. For all I know, he might have only put on 1-2 lbs. I highly doubt that he actually shrunk.
If I did indeed say that 01 ASC Ronnie had more lean mass than 93 Dorian (according to you), then I gracefully take back what I said. Allow me to explain. Upon closer scrutiny, I realized that Dorian may have had equal or even slightly more muscle than Ronnie. I personally feel that Ronnie had better conditioning than 93 Dorian. Even if it means he was carrying only 3-4 lbs less fat and water combined, it adds up. His waist was significantly smaller. I would guess Dorian's midsection weighed 4-6 lbs more. Ronnie also has a smaller bone structure. Dorian has a larger rib cage, wider hips, and thicker joints. However, the difference here wouldn't be much due to racial bone densities. Let's just say that Dorian's entire skeletal mass weighed only 1 lb more. If we assume the lowest values for each part (I'm being generous here) and add them up, then we've already accounted for 8 lbs. At the most, they would add up to 11 lbs. The difference in muscularity between Ronnie and Dorian wouldn't have been that great. In fact, you probably wouldn't even be able to tell any difference at all.
The better comparison is drop Ronnie down to a pound-for-pound weight and see how well he compares to Arnold , lets drop Ronnie down to about 225 pounds and see how impressive he is compared to Arnold
Once again an arbitrary departure from reality from this clown. They do *not* have to be the same weight to be compared, this is very much arbitrary reasoning & part of the dimentia. Endless "what ifs" that are beside the point. Following this bizarre logic, guys could only compete against one another in today's shows if they were the same weight. ::) ::) ::) ::) Next he'll be speculating on what Padilla would've done if he'd been 6'1". ::) The best comparison is simply both of them in good shape.
In that pose Arnold looks a lot better-one of his best poses and not not one of Ron's strongest IMO. Biggest advantages are aesthetics & small pre-GH waist. Coleman wins in terms of pure muscularity, obviously.
Now if you want to see real ownage, compare Schwarzenegger's double-bi to Yates'. haahahahahahahahahahah
Yawn tried old rant from pumpster the master moron , wow you posted a pic of Yates 1994 with a torn bicep and claim how much better Arnold looks ::) you need a better pic of Yates , thats right you're scared to post a proper Yates pic for a reason ;)
Who would want to look like ronnie?Who would want to look like arnold? ARNOLD FOR SURE!!!if i have to choose it from these two,2003 version of ronnie.
YawnMonster photoshop on arnold
don't even start your ironage crap here.
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/comp986.jpg)
(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery1/m70.jpg)
you sound like such a retard. Do you blindly follow everything you hear? I didn't realize just how conditioned Ronnie was at the 01 ASC until I saw the pics. This easily matches Dorian's best ever.
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Ronnie%20Coleman/2001ASC-RonnieColeman33.jpg)
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Ronnie%20Coleman/2001ASC-RonnieColeman38.jpg)
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Ronnie%20Coleman/2001ASC-RonnieColeman41.jpg)
Here is a better shot.
I dont think we have ever seen a better shoing that 98/99 Coleman, but I would much rather look like Arnold.
consider yourself owned. ;)
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Bodybuilders/ArnoldPhotoshop2.jpg)
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Bodybuilders/ArnoldPhotoshop2edited.jpg)
If you want bring the best Sidechest of ronnie,bring it from his first Russian GP.That shocked me a lot.
Here is a side Chest of Ronnie from the 2004 Russian Grand Prix:
but you overlook the fact that dorian should not have won in 94 and by your own admission 97.
so your entire argument is wrong.
Oh shut up kid , you weren't there and neither was I and I understand why the judges picked him over Nasser , Nasser could match or beat Yates from the front but couldn't from the sides and back thats why Yates won , and spare me the look at your own eyes nonsense pictures don't tell the whole story , the judges were live and in person and they picked Yates , I don't think Nasser beat Dorian I just think personally Yates should have won this one . but I'm objective enough to know I may be wrong , something you can't admit.
ND the idiot says that in his opinion yates should of lost the 97 Olympia but then brags that yates got straight firsts scores? lol, what a moron. Make up your mind.
Garbage , water-logged and bloated not to mention unbalanced
You can say the same for yates weak side chest. Getting owned bad by Naseer.
LOL
this side chest blows aways dorian's
LOL
this side chest blows aways dorian's
Yates trumps Schwawzenegger on abs, no doubt about it.
Yawn never seen that pic before , you're as tired as doing 410poundpower-rod benchs on the Bow-Flex ;)
What's with this dweeb's obsession with Bowflex? I thought he asked his parents for one for xmas. ???
hahahaha Dumpster has lost all credibility. I mean, how can you take a bowfelx user seriously?
You're the loser who is using it , giving advice on bodybuilding lmfao talk about irony , how does one build a body with a Bow Flex? care to answer that? its about as effective in size-building as isometrics is , You got owned so badly on the truce thread you ran away with your tail between your legs , remember boy wipe your feet before you step into my house ;)
lol Bow Flex
How embarassing for Yates. :D
hahaha brutal low rent apartment.lol
hahahahahahah pumpster owned yet again hahahahahahaPumpster = faggola hahahahaha
Recent pic of ND's apartment. ROFLMAO
(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/rc80.jpg)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=121458.0;attach=137965;image)
ronnie's arms are so much better it looks like dorian doesn't even train!
You are the master of over exaggeration in a vain attempt to make a point.
I couldn't find a pic of Coleman curling less weight. Oh well, this has to do.