Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on February 07, 2007, 10:14:05 AM

Title: The Rush Formula
Post by: 240 is Back on February 07, 2007, 10:14:05 AM: February x, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Insert rant to divide listeners. Rant will contain issue which affects about .002% of population. Rant will point at dems' actions from '92-'00 for all US failures under Republican rule from '01-'06. Rant will carry water for White House and will blame Pelosi's local actions in San Fransciso for Bush's inability to manage Iraqi wars at least twice. When in doubt or confronted with evidence you do not like, refer to caller as a terrorist, mention a mushroom cloud, and hang up on caller.

END TRANSCRIPT
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: ribonucleic on February 07, 2007, 10:16:34 AM: Quote from: 240 is Back on February 07, 2007, 10:14:05 AM
will blame Pelosi's local actions in San Fransciso

"San Francisco" = code word for "fag"
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on February 07, 2007, 10:43:52 AM: Quote from: 240 is Back on February 07, 2007, 10:14:05 AM
February x, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Insert rant to divide listeners. Rant will contain issue which affects about .002% of population. Rant will point at dems' actions from '92-'00 for all US failures under Republican rule from '01-'06. Rant will carry water for White House and will blame Pelosi's local actions in San Fransciso for Bush's inability to manage Iraqi wars at least twice. When in doubt or confronted with evidence you do not like, refer to caller as a terrorist, mention a mushroom cloud, and hang up on caller.

END TRANSCRIPT

*CRICKETS*
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: OzmO on February 07, 2007, 10:51:54 AM: I personally thought the post was so Right on the MONEY it didn't need any response.
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 07, 2007, 11:31:31 AM: hahaha ;D
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: Deedee on February 07, 2007, 11:53:35 AM: ;D
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: Hugo Chavez on February 07, 2007, 12:24:30 PM: yup... ;D
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: Hugo Chavez on February 07, 2007, 12:25:47 PM: Quote from: Mr. Intenseone on February 07, 2007, 10:43:52 AM
*CRICKETS*
guy, you can't post a crickets for a post that's been up for half an hour in the middle of the morning ::)
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: OzmO on February 07, 2007, 12:28:20 PM: Quote from: Berserker on February 07, 2007, 12:25:47 PM
guy, you can't post a crickets for a post that's been up for half an hour in the middle of the morning ::)

He might be saying "no comment"
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: ieffinhatecardio on February 07, 2007, 12:48:25 PM: Quote from: 240 is Back on February 07, 2007, 10:14:05 AM
February x, 2007

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Insert rant to divide listeners. Rant will contain issue which affects about .002% of population. Rant will point at dems' actions from '92-'00 for all US failures under Republican rule from '01-'06. Rant will carry water for White House and will blame Pelosi's local actions in San Fransciso for Bush's inability to manage Iraqi wars at least twice. When in doubt or confronted with evidence you do not like, refer to caller as a terrorist, mention a mushroom cloud, and hang up on caller.

END TRANSCRIPT

That was actually pretty good. Of course Mr. I. probably didn't enjoy it very much, that's a good thing though. ;D
Title: Re: The Rush Formula
Post by: Hugo Chavez on February 07, 2007, 12:49:57 PM: Quote from: OzmO on February 07, 2007, 12:28:20 PM
He might be saying "no comment"
You mean he's confused again :D "Crickets" is definitely an attempt to say nobody gives a shit...